Utica shale and fracking news
Utica and Marcellus shale web sitesOhio Department of Natural Resources' Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management State agency Web site.
ODNR Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management. State drilling permits. List is updated weekly.
ODNR Division of Geological Survey.
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
Ohio State University Extension.
Ohio Farm Bureau.
Ohio Oil and Gas Association, a Granville-based group that represents 1,500 Ohio energy-related companies.
Ohio Oil & Gas Energy Education Program.
Energy In Depth, a trade group.
Marcellus and Utica Shale Resource Center by Ohio law firm Bricker & Eckler.
Utica Shale, a compilation of Utica shale activities.
Landman Report Card, a site that looks at companies involved in gas and oil leases.FracFocus, a compilation of chemicals used in fracking individual wells as reported voluntarily by some drillers.
Chesapeake Energy Corp,the Oklahoma-based firm is the No. 1 driller in Ohio.
Rig Count Interactive Map by Baker Hughes, an energy services company.
Shale Sheet Fracking, a Youngstown Vindicator blog.
The Ohio Environmental Council, a statewide eco-group based in Columbus.
Earthjustice, a national eco-group.
People's Oil and Gas Collaborative-Ohio, a grass-roots group in Northeast Ohio.
Concerned Citizens of Medina County, a grass-roots group.
No Frack Ohio, a Columbus-based grass-roots group.
Fracking: Gas Drilling's Environmental Threat by ProPublica, an online journalism site.
Pipeline, blog from Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Marcellus shale drilling.
Allegheny Front, environmental public radio for Western Pennsylvania.
From the Youngstown Vindicator:
By Marc Kovac
An update on lawmaker action and other activities at the Ohio Statehouse related to horizontal hydraulic fracturing:
Economic Impact: On Oct. 23, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Institute for 21st Century Energy touted what it called a first-of-its-kind study of the economic impact of shale energy development, with big benefits estimated from fracking-related activities.
The study projected that 1.75 million jobs already have been created in the industry, with millions more projected over the next two decades.
Additionally, “In 2012, shale energy is responsible for $62 billion in tax revenue,” according to the study.
Between now and 2035, shale energy development is expected to contribute more than $2.5 trillion in total tax revenue — more than half of which will go to states and localities.
Overall, between now and 2035, the energy industry will invest more than $5.1 trillion in energy development.”
The study is available online at www.energyxxi.org/americas-energy-future.
Still Pushing: Gov. John Kasich continues to push for an increase in taxes from oil and gas production from horizontal hydraulic fracturing, voicing optimism Oct. 24 that lawmakers would consider his severance-tax proposal during the lame-duck session.
Petitions: The national Environmental Integrity Project announced Oct. 24 that it was joining more than a dozen like-minded groups to petition the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to require more disclosure of chemicals used in horizontal hydraulic fracturing. They want oil and gas producers to report to the Toxics Release Inventory, providing greater public access to the information.
“The EPA estimates the oil and gas industry releases 127,000 tons of hazardous air pollutants every year, second only to power plants and more than any of the other industries already reporting to TRI,” Eric Schaeffer, director of the Environmental Integrity Project, said in a released statement. “Why shouldn’t oil and gas companies be required to report these toxic releases under our right-to-know laws, like so many other industries already do?”
Next Year? Republican Senate President Tom Niehaus told Statehouse reporters Oct. 30 that legislative action on the governor’s frack-tax proposal likely would not happen until the new session.
“We’re just going to start the process of having some conversations to see what, if anything, can be enacted in lame duck, or whether it’s something that we would carry over into next year,” he said.
“There is some talk of a more comprehensive tax-reform package for next year. ... There’s no immediate revenue issue that would dictate that we enact that tax today versus, say, three months from now, so it’s not a pressing timeliness issue from that standpoint.”