☰ Menu
Ohio Utica Shale

Business Roundtable releases national energy plan

By Bob Downing Published: February 25, 2013

From the Business Roundtable:

CEOs from Every Economic Sector Release Comprehensive U.S. Energy Plan

Say ‘Self-Sufficiency Is Within Reach’ If Action Taken to Leverage U.S. Advantages


Washington Business Roundtable(BRT), an association of chief executive officers of leading U.S. companies, today released Taking Action on Energy: A CEO Vision for America’s Energy Future, a detailed, comprehensive national energy strategy to capitalize on U.S. strengths and accelerate economic growth and job creation.


“America’s energy economy is firing on all cylinders – efficiency, renewable power, oil and gas production, and advanced coal and nuclear power technology,” said David M. Cote, Chairman and CEO of Honeywell International, Inc., and Chair of BRT’s Energy and Environment Committee. “North American energy self-sufficiency is within reach, but the missing piece is an effective strategy to capitalize on U.S. advantages. Taking Action on Energy is that strategy.”


In Taking Action on Energy, CEOs, who lead major U.S. companies that operate in every sector of the economy – and represent energy producers, consumers and technology suppliers – offer a vision for America’s energy future that is more affordable, more secure and more sustainable.


“Driven by private sector innovation and investment, the United States is poised to regain its status as an energy superpower,” said John S. Watson, Chairman and CEO of Chevron Corporation. “The dramatic rise in U.S. oil and natural gas production is creating jobs and economic growth across America, but our ability to take full advantage of the historic opportunity in front of us depends upon the right policy framework.”


“Reliable, affordable energy makes the United States the location of choice for manufacturing,” said Andrew N. Liveris, Chairman and CEO of The Dow Chemical Company. “We have outlined a strategy to ensure America stays on top.”


“America’s electric power infrastructure has long delivered value to consumers and enhanced industrial competitiveness,” said Nicholas K. Akins, President and CEO of American Electric Power. “To preserve that value, sound energy strategy must maintain fuel diversity for power generation, support investment in our nation’s transmission system, provide a long-term solution for storing spent nuclear fuel and consider the economic consequences of energy and environmental regulation.”


In Taking Action on Energy, BRT CEOs call on Congress and the Administration to adopt policies that will enhance U.S. self-sufficiency, boost economic growth and promote environmental stewardship. The plan includes detailed and specific recommendations in each of four areas – energy efficiency; traditional energy production; renewable energy production; and electric power generation, transmission and distribution – including measures to:


  • Foster innovationby sustaining public investments in a diverse portfolio of pre-commercial research and development (R&D) activities, including:
  • R&D on cost-effective technologies that have the potential to improve energy efficiency while diversifying energy sources;
  • Projects to demonstrate the commercial viability of carbon capture, utilization and storage, provided that such funding is offered for a finite timeframe and limited in scope; and
  • R&D and demonstration projects for pre-commercial renewable electricity generation and transportation fuels, with an emphasis on performance, emissions reductions and technology neutrality.


  • Drive increased energy efficiency by:
  • Ensuring that state legislatures and public utility commissions consider policies that promote investment in cost-effective energy efficiency measures, and ensure that such investments are as profitable for utilities as generation and distribution assets;
  • Expanding the use of Energy Savings Performance Contracts (ESPCs) and Utility Energy Services Contracts (UESCs) in the federal government, as well as training and education for federal energy managers, policymakers and procurement/legal staff regarding the use and benefits of these contracts; and
  • Encouraging energy efficiency measures at the state level based on effective federal policy guidelines that can be cost-effectively implemented; and giving states the flexibility to account for local differences in regulatory approaches.


  • Improve access to promising energy resourcesby:
  • Increasing access to onshore and offshore federal lands to ensure reliable supplies of coal, oil and natural gas;
  • Streamlining the permitting and approval processes to expedite critical infrastructure projects;
  • Respecting the role that states have traditionally played in regulating oil and natural gas activity on non-federal lands, and ensuring that new regulations for federal lands are developed in consultation with states and are consistent with state regulations; and
  • Ensuring that EPA regulations are based on sound science, undergo thorough net cost-benefit analysis, and take into consideration the net cumulative impact these regulations have on energy costs, economic growth and job creation, while being protective of human health and the environment.


  • Reform incentives for renewable power technology deploymentby:
  • Providing wind-powered electricity generation with a smooth transition to an era of unsubsidized competitiveness by extending the wind production tax credit so that the benefit is gradually reduced and ultimately eliminated;
  • Ensuring that decisions regarding tax incentives for renewable resources are designed to address well-documented market inefficiencies, applied only to those fuels and technologies with a credible path to unsubsidized competitiveness and finite in duration and eventually phased out in a predictable fashion;
  • Accounting for regional variations in renewable energy resource availability when developing legislation and regulation; and
  • With respect to the renewable fuel standard, policymakers should consider the limitations of the current vehicle fleet, fuel distribution infrastructure and actual production capacity, and adopt targeted modifications as needed.


  • Encourage accelerated modernization of the electric power sectorby:
  • Carefully evaluating the timing and cumulative impact of EPA regulations on the electric utility industry and, as appropriate, modifying these regulations to ensure continued reliability, avoid unreasonable rate impacts, and maintain a diverse, market-driven portfolio of baseload electricity generation fuel options;
  • Devising a long-term solution to remove and manage nuclear spent fuel;
  • Providing transparent rate incentives for cost-effective upgrades to the nation’s transmission infrastructure in order to facilitate grid modernization and support competitive wholesale electricity markets;
  • Improving coordination among federal agencies, such as the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission and U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), state commissions and other stakeholders, to address the complexity, unpredictability and inefficiency of transmission planning, siting and cost allocation decisions for interstate projects;
  • Supporting DOE and National Institute of Standards and Technology efforts to accelerate and coordinate the development of “smart grid” standards; and
  • Requiring actionable and timely cybersecurity threat intelligence sharing from government to critical infrastructure owners and operators.


“America’s energy future is bright, but it is not certain,” concluded Cote. “A diverse portfolio of energy efficiency and supply options is the best way to preserve and extend America’s significant energy advantages.”


Click here to view the full report.


Click here to view a one-page overview of the full report.


Click here to view a one-page overview of the CEO recommendations on energy efficiency.


Click here to view a one-page overview of the CEO recommendations on traditional energy production.


Click here to view a one-page overview of the CEO recommendations on renewable energy production.


Click here to view a one-page overview of the CEO recommendations on electric power generation, transmission and distribution



See the most recent drilling report and an injection wells map From
Prev Next

Utica and Marcellus shale web sites

Ohio Department of Natural Resources' Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management State agency Web site.

ODNR Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management. State drilling permits. List is updated weekly.

ODNR Division of Geological Survey.

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.

Ohio State University Extension.

Ohio Farm Bureau.

Ohio Oil and Gas Association, a Granville-based group that represents 1,500 Ohio energy-related companies.

Ohio Oil & Gas Energy Education Program.

Energy In Depth, a trade group.

Marcellus and Utica Shale Resource Center by Ohio law firm Bricker & Eckler.

Utica Shale, a compilation of Utica shale activities.

Landman Report Card, a site that looks at companies involved in gas and oil leases.FracFocus, a compilation of chemicals used in fracking individual wells as reported voluntarily by some drillers.

Chesapeake Energy Corp,the Oklahoma-based firm is the No. 1 driller in Ohio.

Rig Count Interactive Map by Baker Hughes, an energy services company.

Shale Sheet Fracking, a Youngstown Vindicator blog.

National Geographic's The Great Shale Rush.

The Ohio Environmental Council, a statewide eco-group based in Columbus.

Buckeye Forest Council.

Earthjustice, a national eco-group.

Stop Fracking Ohio.

People's Oil and Gas Collaborative-Ohio, a grass-roots group in Northeast Ohio.

Concerned Citizens of Medina County, a grass-roots group.

No Frack Ohio, a Columbus-based grass-roots group.

Fracking: Gas Drilling's Environmental Threat by ProPublica, an online journalism site.

Penn State Marcellus Center.

Pipeline, blog from Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Marcellus shale drilling.

Allegheny Front, environmental public radio for Western Pennsylvania.