☰ Menu
Ohio Utica Shale

Exxon Mobil begins well in Russian Arctic Ocean

By Bob Downing Published: August 11, 2014

From Bloomberg News on Friday:

Sanctions, what sanctions?

 Exxon Mobile Corp. will start drilling a $700 million well in the Arctic Ocean tomorrow, Russia’s government said, showing that for all the talk of action against Vladimir Putin’s oil industry, the largest U.S. energy company is undeterred.

As Russia’s relations with Europe and the U.S. deteriorated to the lowest point since the Cold war over the conflict in Ukraine, the European Union imposed a third round of sanctions last week, restricting the export of equipment used for offshore oil production. That doesn’t affect Exxon’s plans because the contract to hire the rig was signed before the measures were announced.

Developing the Arctic is vital for Russia, where energy provides half the state’s revenue, to maintain oil production near a post-Soviet high of more than 10 million barrels a day. For Exxon, where output fell to a five-year low in the second quarter, a discovery would offer a vital new source of crude.

“The well is very important, it’s probably one of the most interesting wells in the global oil industry for many years,” James Henderson, a senior research fellow at the Oxford Institute for Energy Studies, said in a phone interview.

After more than two years’ planning Exxon and its partner OAO Rosneft, Russia’s state oil producer, will start drilling the Universitetskaya prospect tomorrow, the Kremlin said in a statement today. Putin will give the signal to start Russia’s northernmost well accompanied by Rosneft Chief Executive Igor Sechin, who’s subject to U.S. sanctions himself, and Exxon Mobil Russia head Glenn Waller.


Neither Exxon nor Rosneft press service immediately responded to requests for confirmation.

Universitetskaya is the first of as many as 40 offshore wells Rosneft plans by 2018 to test the potential of the unexplored the Arctic Ocean. The geological structure targeted by the drilling is roughly the size of the city of Moscow and may contain as many as 9 billion barrels of oil, according to a presentation on Rosneft’s website.

“It is an anomaly in the current situation and just how long major western companies, such as Exxon, can carry on doing this, is anybody’s guess,” said John Lough, a London-based associate fellow at Chatham House, a London-based foreign policy research group. “They are light sanctions at the moment in terms of the energy industry.”

Exxon isn’t the only western oil company involved. BP Plc, the U.K.’s second-largest oil company by value, has an interest through it’s 20 percent stake in Rosneft.

The West Alpha rig, leased by Exxon from Bermuda-based Seadrill Ltd., is currently in Kara Sea about 72 miles off the coast of Novaya Zemlya, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.


Drilling will take about 70 days, a period that should be sufficient to assess the reserves of any discovery, Rosneft’s head of offshore, Zeljko Runje, said on a call with analysts last week. The area is relatively free of icebergs, meaning work is ready to start, he said.

Longer-term, the sanctions announced last week may start to slow the development of the Arctic shelf, said Edward Chow, a senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and International Studies.

“Sanctions were not designed to stop this, but overall the project is bound to slow down as would all long-term, high-risk projects of this sort until how sanctions are enforced and their duration are clear,” he said.


Russia has responded by banning food from the EU and U.S. yesterday and threatened to limit overflights from Europe to Asia. That means that in the future, Exxon-led crews on drilling rigs may not even be able to eat food from America. Air travel will be no problem as the only way to reach the remote deposit is a four-day sail from Murmansk, the Arctic’s largest city.

In addition to the political background, drilling in the Arctic Ocean is controversial because campaigners say it threatens a unique ecosystem.

“The West Alpha platform is fast becoming the most controversial oil rig in the world,” Gustavo Ampugnani, an Arctic campaigner at Greenpeace, said in an e-mailed statement. The companies’ plan “to drill in the ecologically sensitive Arctic is nothing less than absurd.”

Tensions with Russia will make companies pay more attention to risk, said Richard Mallinson, an analyst at Energy Aspects Ltd. in London.


“A company could put a lot of money into a country and sanctions could reach point where you couldn’t carry on, like in Iran,” he said in a telephone interview. “I’m not saying we’re on that path yet with Russia. But from the company’s point of view they have to have an eye on what level of risk there is and whether its acceptable.”

The Exxon-Rosneft cooperation also includes a $300 million investment in Russian shale pilot projects, which now risk being suspended, Rosneft Chairman Alexander Nekipelov said on July 29. Exxon has come under pressure and showed surprising perseverance, Nekipelov said at the time.

Exxon and Rosneft have also invested in a new platform this year to expand oil production at the Sakhalin-1 project in Russia’s Far East.

David S. Cohen, U.S. Treasury Undersecretary for Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, declined to comment on Exxon’s work in Russia on a call with reporters this week.

“We are in close contact with U.S. businesses with respect to all of these sanctions” programs, Cohen said, while declining to discuss the details of those conversations with specific companies.

Exxon’s decision to press ahead with exploration means it maintains plans for development, according to Mallinson. At the same time reciprocal sanctions and Russian troops massed near the Ukraine border have companies legitimately concerned about risk, he said.

“That has big implications for Russia’s future production prospects, if the sanctions do remain in place and companies do scale back plans,” Energy Aspect’s Mallinson said.



See the most recent drilling report and an injection wells map From
Prev Next

Utica and Marcellus shale web sites

Ohio Department of Natural Resources' Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management State agency Web site.

ODNR Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management. State drilling permits. List is updated weekly.

ODNR Division of Geological Survey.

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.

Ohio State University Extension.

Ohio Farm Bureau.

Ohio Oil and Gas Association, a Granville-based group that represents 1,500 Ohio energy-related companies.

Ohio Oil & Gas Energy Education Program.

Energy In Depth, a trade group.

Marcellus and Utica Shale Resource Center by Ohio law firm Bricker & Eckler.

Utica Shale, a compilation of Utica shale activities.

Landman Report Card, a site that looks at companies involved in gas and oil leases.FracFocus, a compilation of chemicals used in fracking individual wells as reported voluntarily by some drillers.

Chesapeake Energy Corp,the Oklahoma-based firm is the No. 1 driller in Ohio.

Rig Count Interactive Map by Baker Hughes, an energy services company.

Shale Sheet Fracking, a Youngstown Vindicator blog.

National Geographic's The Great Shale Rush.

The Ohio Environmental Council, a statewide eco-group based in Columbus.

Buckeye Forest Council.

Earthjustice, a national eco-group.

Stop Fracking Ohio.

People's Oil and Gas Collaborative-Ohio, a grass-roots group in Northeast Ohio.

Concerned Citizens of Medina County, a grass-roots group.

No Frack Ohio, a Columbus-based grass-roots group.

Fracking: Gas Drilling's Environmental Threat by ProPublica, an online journalism site.

Penn State Marcellus Center.

Pipeline, blog from Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Marcellus shale drilling.

Allegheny Front, environmental public radio for Western Pennsylvania.