☰ Menu
Ohio Utica Shale

Ohio frack waste facilities proliferate with little oversight

By Bob Downing Published: March 29, 2016

From two environmental groups last week:


Frack Waste Facilities Proliferate in Ohio Despite Lack of Regulations


As the horizontal hydrofracking industry continues to operate without adequate regulation, the waste produced is a big problem for the industry for which Ohio has provided a cheap solution. Ohio not only allows waste from in-state fracking operations to be disposed of without traceability, monitoring and adequate regulation, it also is accepting waste from other states. Recently, plans were approved to allow the barge shipment of frack waste on the Ohio River, meaning frack waste could potentially come to Ohio from Texas and other states who find it easier and cheaper to send it to Ohio than dispose of it themselves.


The lack of regulation means Ohio will be the fracking waste destination of choice ahead of all other states. Although frack waste is toxic and radioactive, it is still falsely but legally classified as “non-hazardous,” which allows it to be cheaply disposed of in Class II injection wells. In addition to the injection wells, there are many other frack waste handling facilities in operation. Without regulations in place, these facilities are given “Chief’s Orders” to operate which means that the companies handling the waste, many of them limited liability corporations, can do business without the necessary regulations for public protections. Despite the fact that Food & Water Watch and FreshWater Accountability Project  (FWAP) initiated a lawsuit to compel the overseeing agency, the Ohio Department of Natural Resources (ODNR), to implement necessary rules to govern these facilities, that lawsuit is languishing in the court system. In fact, of the 20 rules that Ohio stated needed to be implemented to govern the fracking industry and its waste to protect the environment and public health, only one has been implemented, which has to do with the construction of well pads. Despite the fact that several laws have been enacted to write these rules and provide better tracking and reporting, the industry still operates without the necessary regulations.


For the public to know what frack waste handling facilities are operating without the necessary regulations in their communities, citizens must do public records requests and wait for the information to piece together what companies are doing with the frack waste, where they are located, and how they operate. Because they are private companies, the most important information communities need to know to protect themselves, such how much waste is being handled, what are the test results for toxicity and radioactivity (if tested), and where the frack material comes from and ends up are not available. Without the necessary regulations to do the reporting, it is possible that at this time, inadequate monitoring means radioactive frack waste is being transported, processed and disposed of in ways that could bio-accumulate and leach into the soil, water and be released into the air without the knowledge of the local communities that will be affected. This means there is no way to hold the frack waste processors or the overseeing agency, the ODNR, accountable for public health effects or future remediation.


Through a public records request, FWAP was able to obtain information on an additional 16 facilities given ODNR Chief’s Orders and have posted the information to share with the public at: .  Local communities are urged to investigate for themselves what the potential impacts could be from these unregulated facilities, and get involved to protect themselves, their environment, and their quality of life. FWAP will continue to make public records requests about these facilities and post the information. Having limited information about these facilities is better than nothing, but the ODNR should be more transparent so communities know there are toxic waste handling facilities in their midst in order to protect themselves, especially without the adequate regulations in place that are necessary to do so.


Other states are sending frack waste to Ohio because of lax regulations. Per a New York Times expose of confidential documents obtained from the USEPA: "The disposal of wastewater is called a "bottleneck" here because the type of natural gas production used in Pennsylvania requires massive amounts of water, which is mixed with chemicals. Much of this water, which can be made toxic by the chemicals as well as harmful substances deep in the earth, flows back out of the gas well. The document is raising concerns that Pennsylvania does not have enough capacity to process this drilling wastewater."

In Pennsylvania, where unconventional shale gas drillling waste is regulated by USEPA Region 3, their oversight means that the state cannot so readily process or dispose of frack waste. Their solution? Send it to Ohio for cheap disposal. The increasing number of LLC’s that are being licensed to operate through ODNR “Chief’s Orders” to process frack waste are potential public health and waste remediation liabilities for the future. Local communities are urged to look into these facilities and find ways to protect their environment and public health by closely monitoring air and water quality near these facilities.





See the most recent drilling report and an injection wells map From
Prev Next

Utica and Marcellus shale web sites

Ohio Department of Natural Resources' Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management State agency Web site.

ODNR Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management. State drilling permits. List is updated weekly.

ODNR Division of Geological Survey.

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.

Ohio State University Extension.

Ohio Farm Bureau.

Ohio Oil and Gas Association, a Granville-based group that represents 1,500 Ohio energy-related companies.

Ohio Oil & Gas Energy Education Program.

Energy In Depth, a trade group.

Marcellus and Utica Shale Resource Center by Ohio law firm Bricker & Eckler.

Utica Shale, a compilation of Utica shale activities.

Landman Report Card, a site that looks at companies involved in gas and oil leases.FracFocus, a compilation of chemicals used in fracking individual wells as reported voluntarily by some drillers.

Chesapeake Energy Corp,the Oklahoma-based firm is the No. 1 driller in Ohio.

Rig Count Interactive Map by Baker Hughes, an energy services company.

Shale Sheet Fracking, a Youngstown Vindicator blog.

National Geographic's The Great Shale Rush.

The Ohio Environmental Council, a statewide eco-group based in Columbus.

Buckeye Forest Council.

Earthjustice, a national eco-group.

Stop Fracking Ohio.

People's Oil and Gas Collaborative-Ohio, a grass-roots group in Northeast Ohio.

Concerned Citizens of Medina County, a grass-roots group.

No Frack Ohio, a Columbus-based grass-roots group.

Fracking: Gas Drilling's Environmental Threat by ProPublica, an online journalism site.

Penn State Marcellus Center.

Pipeline, blog from Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Marcellus shale drilling.

Allegheny Front, environmental public radio for Western Pennsylvania.