☰ Menu
Ohio Utica Shale

Pipeline development will help shape Canada's energy future

By Bob Downing Published: December 2, 2013

From Bloomberg News today:

By Jeremy van Loon & Rebecca Penty


Canada’s bid to become what Prime Minister Stephen Harper calls an energy “superpower” is at risk as approval delays for new pipelines threaten an industry already hurt by high costs and rival production.

The world’s sixth-largest crude producer can’t get its surging crude supplies to markets in Asia where prices are higher than in North America. Decisions in the next year or so on proposed pipelines designed to connect oil-sands production to supertankers on the Atlantic and Pacific coasts may set the tone for the future of the nation’s energy industry.



“There’s no doubt that over the next 12 to 24 months, there will be some significant decisions made on pipelines infrastructure in Canada,” Ian Anderson, president of the Canadian division of Kinder Morgan (KMP) Energy Partners LP, said in a Nov. 29 interview in Lake Louise, Alberta. “What’s important about the time frame is, there’s a window of opportunity here to build this infrastructure.”

Prime Minister Harper is counting on Asian markets to reduce the $30 a barrel discount between Canadian heavy crude and the U.S. benchmark as well as to provide job and economic growth and boost tax revenue. Harper has referred to Canada as an emerging energy superpower because it has the world’s third-largest oil reserves, and as output from the oil sands is projected to double over the next decade.

Further delays on pipeline projects may set back Canada’s ability to capture rising demand for fossil fuel and condemn its producers to lower prices, said Judith Dwarkin, director of energy research at ITG Investment Research Inc. in Calgary.

“The reality is it’s by no means certain which of them will be approved and built,” she said. “In the meantime, Alberta’s bitumen producers can’t stop or won’t stop the production train.”

Proposed pipelines currently being reviewed by regulators who will probably make decisions on approval or rejection in 2014 and 2015 include Enbridge Inc. (ENB)’s C$6 billion ($5.7 billion) Northern Gateway and its Line 9B reversal; TransCanada Corp. (TRP)’s C$5.4 billion Keystone XL and C$12 billion Energy East projects, as well as Kinder Morgan’s Trans Mountain expansion.

Some of these projects are already delayed. TransCanada was originally planning to have Keystone XL on line in 2012 while Enbridge had forecast a decision on Northern Gateway by the end of 2012 and to get it up and running by 2017.

Enbridge has faced opposition from aboriginal groups, including the Yinka Dene Alliance as well as the Haisla and Haida First Nations. In addition, the pipeline is opposed by the New Democratic Party, Canada's official opposition party. Keystone, which must be approved by the U.S., because it crosses the U.S.-Canada border, has been challenged by U.S. environmental groups.

There’s an excess of export pipeline capacity proposed to North American coasts that should start coming online in 2016 --more than 3 million barrels of crude a day -- to account for future oil-sands production increases, Dwarkin said. With ITG forecasting bitumen output will rise by just over 200,000 barrels a day annually from 2014 to 2020, there are another three years of “discounted prices” for Canadian heavy crude, she said.

Spot prices for Western Canadian Select, the benchmark for heavy crude, dipped to its lowest point this year at $51.37 a barrel on Nov. 5 and traded at $63.22 on Nov. 29. That compares with $92.72 for West Texas Intermediate futures and $109.69 for Brent.

Production of bitumen, which is refined into fuels such as gasoline and diesel, is poised to double from last year to 3.8 million barrels a day by 2022, according to the Alberta Energy Regulator.

Pipelines in Canada already carry 15 percent of the nation’s exports in the form of crude, mostly to U.S. markets. Canada’s oil trade rose 7 percent to about C$73 billion last year, according to Statistics Canada, and is set to grow faster than the total economy.

Rising costs because of labor shortages and operating in the remote region of northern Alberta mean Canada’s energy industry is already at a cost disadvantage to competitors, said Murray Edwards, chairman of Canadian Natural Resources Ltd., the country’s largest heavy oil producer.

“We’re already a high-cost industry and a lot of projects are economically challenged,” Edwards said in an interview in Lake Louise. The prospects of Iranian oil exports and rising interest rates put the industry further at risk, he added.

In addition, the industry faces public scrutiny over the environmental impact of its operations. Eco-groups including Greenpeace have called for a half to oil-sands development, citing damage to local ecosystems, rising emissions of carbon dioxide and the risk of leaks from pipelines.

Meanwhile, investors are boosting the value of Canadian energy stocks. The Standard & Poors/TSX Energy Index has risen 6.9 percent this year, compared with a 7.7 percent gain in Canada’s benchmark gauge. Enbridge has gained 1.6 percent, while Canadian Natural has surged 21 percent. TransCanada is little changed.

“Next year could certainly be an inflection point,” said Jamie Bonham, who’s in charge of extractives research at NEI Investments, which oversees C$5.5 billion in assets. “There are several decisions coming, especially Northern Gateway and possibly Keystone, that may set the tone for how and how much Canadian oil is exported and could lead to some soul searching for both industry and government. The outcome of one of these projects being approved may have an impact on the others.”

“Today our nation is at a crossroads,” New Brunswick Premier David Alward said in Lake Louise. “The fundamental issue we face is whether we move forward. We don’t have the luxury of delaying these projects and delaying growth.”



See the most recent drilling report and an injection wells map From
  • Main Blog Promo
  • Cavs Blog Promo
  • Browns Blog Promo
  • Indians Blog Promo
  • Beer Blog Promo
  • Fracking Blog Promo
  • High School Blog Promo
  • Zips Blog Promo
  • Akron Dish Food Blog
Prev Next

Utica and Marcellus shale web sites

Ohio Department of Natural Resources' Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management State agency Web site.

ODNR Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management. State drilling permits. List is updated weekly.

ODNR Division of Geological Survey.

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.

Ohio State University Extension.

Ohio Farm Bureau.

Ohio Oil and Gas Association, a Granville-based group that represents 1,500 Ohio energy-related companies.

Ohio Oil & Gas Energy Education Program.

Energy In Depth, a trade group.

Marcellus and Utica Shale Resource Center by Ohio law firm Bricker & Eckler.

Utica Shale, a compilation of Utica shale activities.

Landman Report Card, a site that looks at companies involved in gas and oil leases.FracFocus, a compilation of chemicals used in fracking individual wells as reported voluntarily by some drillers.

Chesapeake Energy Corp,the Oklahoma-based firm is the No. 1 driller in Ohio.

Rig Count Interactive Map by Baker Hughes, an energy services company.

Shale Sheet Fracking, a Youngstown Vindicator blog.

National Geographic's The Great Shale Rush.

The Ohio Environmental Council, a statewide eco-group based in Columbus.

Buckeye Forest Council.

Earthjustice, a national eco-group.

Stop Fracking Ohio.

People's Oil and Gas Collaborative-Ohio, a grass-roots group in Northeast Ohio.

Concerned Citizens of Medina County, a grass-roots group.

No Frack Ohio, a Columbus-based grass-roots group.

Fracking: Gas Drilling's Environmental Threat by ProPublica, an online journalism site.

Penn State Marcellus Center.

Pipeline, blog from Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Marcellus shale drilling.

Allegheny Front, environmental public radio for Western Pennsylvania.