Utica shale and fracking news
Utica and Marcellus shale web sitesOhio Department of Natural Resources' Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management State agency Web site.
ODNR Division of Oil and Gas Resources Management. State drilling permits. List is updated weekly.
ODNR Division of Geological Survey.
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency.
Ohio State University Extension.
Ohio Farm Bureau.
Ohio Oil and Gas Association, a Granville-based group that represents 1,500 Ohio energy-related companies.
Ohio Oil & Gas Energy Education Program.
Energy In Depth, a trade group.
Marcellus and Utica Shale Resource Center by Ohio law firm Bricker & Eckler.
Utica Shale, a compilation of Utica shale activities.
Landman Report Card, a site that looks at companies involved in gas and oil leases.FracFocus, a compilation of chemicals used in fracking individual wells as reported voluntarily by some drillers.
Chesapeake Energy Corp,the Oklahoma-based firm is the No. 1 driller in Ohio.
Rig Count Interactive Map by Baker Hughes, an energy services company.
Shale Sheet Fracking, a Youngstown Vindicator blog.
The Ohio Environmental Council, a statewide eco-group based in Columbus.
Earthjustice, a national eco-group.
People's Oil and Gas Collaborative-Ohio, a grass-roots group in Northeast Ohio.
Concerned Citizens of Medina County, a grass-roots group.
No Frack Ohio, a Columbus-based grass-roots group.
Fracking: Gas Drilling's Environmental Threat by ProPublica, an online journalism site.
Pipeline, blog from Pittsburgh Post-Gazette on Marcellus shale drilling.
Allegheny Front, environmental public radio for Western Pennsylvania.
From the Houston Chronicle:
Most recent earthquakes in North Texas happened close to injection wells used to dispose of wastewater from oil and gas drilling in the region, according to new research.
A two-year study by the University of Texas at Austin also found that the relatively minor temblors happened more often than indicated in previous investigations.
The UT study, published this week in “Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,” is the latest to suggest a link between drilling and seismic activity.
“You can’t prove that any one earthquake was caused by an injection well,” said Cliff Frohlich, the University of Texas researcher who conducted the study. “But it’s obvious that wells are enhancing the probability that earthquakes will occur.”
A U.S. Geological Survey report released earlier this year found that an increase in small temblors throughout the Midwest coincides with the injection of drilling wastewater in deep disposal wells. An Ohio state agency concluded in March that a wastewater injection well was responsible for a dozen earthquakes in Youngstown last year.
In June, the National Reserach Council released a report concluding that while there is a low risk of earthquakes directly tied to oil and gas drilling techniques, underground wastewater injections pose a higher risk of triggering seismic activity.
Drilling companies have said they do not believe earthquakes are linked to injection wells.
The wells store wastewater from hydraulic fracturing, a drilling and well stimulation technique that involves pumping mixtures of water, sand and chemicals underground to release natural gas and oil trapped in dense rock formations.
About a third of the water that is pumped underground emerges as “flowback” water before a well starts producing. Later, the well discharges a briny, metal-laden “produced” water that comes from the formation itself.
Frohlich’s research focused on seismic data from the Barnett Shale region of Texas spanning nearly two years, from November 2009 to September 2011. He concluded that the most reliably pinpointed earthquakes occurring during that time were in eight groups, all located within two miles of one or more injection wells.
That’s a change from earlier studies that associated two earthquake groups in the area with specific injection wells. Frohlich’s new data suggests it is more common for injection wells to trigger earthquakes.
But his data also show disparities. In some cases where drillers rapidly disposed of wastewater underground there were temblors nearby. But in other cases with similar circumstances, there were no resulting quakes. Some areas of the Barnett Shale with many injection wells also had relatively few quakes.
Frohlich speculated the difference may be that wastewater injected in some wells reaches existing faults.
Some of the earthquakes were so small they could not be felt on the surface; others, as high as 2.5 in magnitude, were still so light they didn’t pose real danger, the University of Texas said.