Events Calendar
In This Section
Hospital connects to patients online
AutoZone to replace Blockbuster in West Akron
Gains in financials, material stocks lift market
Jobless claims indicate economy remains weak
Citigroup shuffles executives, former CFO leaving
GM, Chrysler fight reopening of closed dealerships
YRC, Teamsters reach tentative deal on concessions
Most Read Stories
Akron police investigate teen mob attack on family
Woman, 75, charged with beating fawn to death
Akron woman found dead at Brimfield Township store
Man shot in back near Akron park
Man shot outside his Akron home during robbery attempt
Man admits repeatedly biting 2-year-old
Tragic day puts man on path to be Pinnacle owner
Blogs:
Pets:
Dogs' Bark: Not fair! Study shows pups get jealous
The Heldenfiles:
Who Will Get the Michael Media Treatment Next?
Patrick McManamon:
More on Varejao
Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Kent State
Browns Bulletin:
Quick thought on Browns rookies
Tribe Matters:
Wedge challenges relievers
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana
Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Andy’s Signed According to ESPN
All Da King's Men:
Does Medicare Have Lower Administrative Costs ?
Blog of Mass Destruction:
CIA Did Mislead Congress
Akron Law Café:
Breaking Story: CIA Lied to Congress about Secret Program
Varsity Letters:
East basketball update
See Jane Style:
Oh Baby!
Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Closings….Not the Good Kind!
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Margy inquires-when is a Taste of Hudson?
Sound Check:
LeVert II live performance Saturday night — "Dedication" album due July 13,
HRLite House:
DDI One of Best Places to Work
Akron Gamer:
First 24 'Guitar Hero 5' songs announced
It's not possible for one product or strategy to do it all, plus needs different depending on person
Published on Sunday, Nov 04, 2007
I have confused you.
Whenever I discuss a way to manage money in retirement, many of you see it as a recommendation. How can I be in favor of something one week and something else the next, you ask.
One thing I clearly don't advocate is trying to live simply off the interest from your savings, without touching principal. Unless you are super rich, live a Spartan life or plan to die soon, I don't see how this strategy can generate an adequate income that keeps up with inflation during a retirement that could last 30 years or more. Maybe you can do it with stock dividends that rise regularly, but the risks and uncertainties are too high.
But how about these strategies?
Repeatedly creating ''income ladders'' with part of your savings while investing the rest for growth. By receiving income and liquidating principal from fixed-income investments, you might be able to cover your expenses for, say, the next 10 years. By then, your other investments might have grown enough to set up a new income ladder. This strategy requires a fair amount of money to implement and does not eliminate risk of loss.
Putting all your money in a diversified portfolio of stocks, bonds and other asset classes and making ''systematic withdrawals'' for living expenses. Aside from the risk of loss, if you withdraw too much too soon, you might run out of money. If you are too cautious and withdraw too little, you'll miss out on things you could afford.
Using new types of mutual funds that manage the withdrawals for you. Last week, I wrote about low-cost, widely diversified funds from Fidelity and Vanguard designed to pay out fairly predictable monthly income with the potential to keep up with inflation. Projected payouts are based on reasonable expectations, but there are no guarantees and you could lose money.
Buying an immediate annuity from a financially strong insurance company that, in return from your lump-sum premium, guarantees you (or you and your spouse) a monthly income for life, either fixed or rising each year to counteract inflation. You won't outlive your money but will forever give up access to your principal or at least seriously limit such access.
Investing in a deferred variable annuity that, for a fee, guarantees that you (or you and your spouse) can withdraw at least a minimum amount each year for life, no matter how your investments perform. (Immediate income annuities that pay a set income for life and deferred variable annuities with mutual-fund-like investment ''sub-accounts'' are different products. More than 100 reader e-mails suggest many of you incorrectly think the two are the same.)
My recommendation? Discarding the impractical don't-touch-the-principal strategy, it would be ''any, some, all or perhaps none of the above,'' depending on each person's circumstances. This might seem like a copout, but no one product or strategy can do it all, and needs are different for different people, emphasize Boyce Greer and Jon Skillman, two Fidelity Investments executives.
Their comments are appropriate, because Fidelity is the only financial services firm I know that offers brokerage services and low-cost, direct-marketed funds and immediate and variable annuities that can be used for all the strategies I mentioned.
Fidelity's new ''Growth and Guaranteed Income'' deferred variable annuity guarantees minimum lifetime withdrawals at substantially lower fees than other annuities offering similar guarantees. If you go online to http://www.fidelity.com and type income products in the search box, you will find admittedly promotional, but nevertheless highly educational materials and useful tools to compare the pros and cons of different products and strategies.
Send questions or comments to Humberto Cruz at AskHumberto@aol.com or by mail to Tribune Media Services, 2225 Kenmore Ave., Buffalo, N.Y. 14207. Personal replies are not possible.
I have confused you.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
