Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Akron Law Café:
Exxon Saved From the Rocks: The Supreme Court Limits Punitive Damages

The Heldenfiles:
Happy Day

Balanced Ledger:
Olympics, interested?

Patrick McManamon:
Yellowstone, C.C. Sabathia, Brian Windhorst and … yes … Yellowstone

Browns Bulletin:
ESPN's Browns love-in chugs along

Cleveland Browns:
Bentley leaves minicamp

Cleveland Indians:
Spanked on Independence Day

Akron Aeros:
All Stars, Roster Moves and More!

Akron Zips:
Contemplating fall camp

Varsity Letters:
CVCA junior soccer stars Speas & Mason to play at UA

Kent State Sports:
Jarvis on Maxwell watch list

Ohio Politics:
2008 = 1972? 1976? 1992? 2000? 2004?

All Da King's Men:
Words For Independence Day

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Dependence Day

Akrocentric:
Charles Taormina discusses "Acceptance of Individual Authors," self-publishing resources

Akron Gamer:
Harmonix keeps on Rock'n

BokBluster:
Patriot Games

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Is there an American Girl store in Ohio?

Olympic Dreams - Running:
Back to Phase One

Sound Check:
Tim McGraw wows and woos Blossom

Tia's Trends:
Saks Saleswoman Accused of Stealing $1 Million

FedEx drivers use IRS review as leverage

Contractors ask federal judges to consider them as full-time employees for '02 tax filing purposes

By Laurence Viele Davidson
Bloomberg News

FedEx Corp. contract drivers suing the company for pay and benefits asked federal judges to consider an Internal Revenue Service preliminary decision that they may be regarded as full-time employees for 2002 tax purposes.

FedEx, the second-largest U.S. package delivery service, said in a regulatory filing last month it might have to pay $319 million in taxes and penalties plus interest for 2002 for misclassifying the contractors.

The IRS is reviewing calendar years 2004 through 2006 for similar issues, FedEx said.

The drivers want to use the IRS decision as leverage in dozens of lawsuits seeking hundreds of millions of dollars, claiming the company exerts control over them as if they were full-time workers without paying full-time benefits.

The cases are consolidated in federal court in South Bend, Ind.

''The IRS determination demonstrates that on the merits, plaintiffs can offer and prove by common evidence that the drivers are legally employees, not independent contractors,'' the plaintiffs said in a request for ''judicial notice,'' filed Wednesday to U.S. District Judge Robert Miller.

FedEx said there were ''mischaracterizations'' in the plaintiffs' filing.

One case is certified as a nationwide class action and dozens of others are before Miller for similar consideration.

Memphis, Tenn.-based FedEx is appealing the certification of one case to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which also has the plaintiff's request to note the IRS finding.

FedEx told the appeals court in a letter the IRS finding is preliminary, not binding, and reverses a 1994 decision validating its contractor policy.

FedEx said in a statement Thursday that the company has ''strong defenses to the IRS's tentative assessment and will vigorously defend our position, as we continue to believe that FedEx Ground's owner-operators are independent contractors and that no loss is probable.''

FedEx had legal setbacks related to its ground-delivery contractor policy in 2007.

In December, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley fined FedEx $190,000 for what she called intentionally misclassifying 13 drivers as contractors.

The California Supreme Court in November upheld a trial court decision that single-route contractors in that state were full-time workers.

FedEx defends its contractor system as an opportunity for drivers to be entrepreneurs. Multi-route contractors can hire their own workers.

The company discontinued single-route contract drivers in California after the courts sided with the drivers.

FedEx Corp. contract drivers suing the company for pay and benefits asked federal judges to consider an Internal Revenue Service preliminary decision that they may be regarded as full-time employees for 2002 tax purposes.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button