Events Calendar
In This Section
After 30 years at the helm of Akron Children's, Considine still looks to future
New version of Mozilla Thunderbird landing soon
SCORE offers wide variety of workshops
About Matsos Greek Dressing & Marinade
All-in-one units jolt desktop computer sales
Does it work? Test team returns to try out new products advertised on television
Most Read Stories
Police accuse bank robbery suspect of gobbling up note (with dashcam video)
Victim of beating in Kent last week is declared dead at Akron hospital
Can DNA tests free ex-Akron captain?
Dad accused of forcing son into field, killing him
Does it work? Test team returns to try out new products advertised on television
Man found dead in North Akron home is identified
Blogs:
Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens
The Heldenfiles:
Sunday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Browns sick after sick loss in Detroit
Akron Zips:
Zips advance to Sweet Sixteen
Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster
Cleveland Browns:
Post-game defensive quotes
Kent State Sports:
Kent State defeats Rochester College, 63-44
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad
Varsity Letters:
Four area football teams play tonight
All Da King's Men:
The Sunday Sanity Challenge
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Will Health Care Reform Pass?
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (69) The Brookings Institute Study on "Bending the Curve" – Four General Strategies
See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic
Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Silverdome Potentially SOLD!
Ohio Travels with Betty:
George is looking for a Thanksgiving buffet in Akron.
Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall
HRLite House:
A Random Rant on Testing
Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go
Contractors ask federal judges to consider them as full-time employees for '02 tax filing purposes
By Laurence Viele Davidson
Bloomberg News
Published on Friday, Jan 04, 2008
FedEx Corp. contract drivers suing the company for pay and benefits asked federal judges to consider an Internal Revenue Service preliminary decision that they may be regarded as full-time employees for 2002 tax purposes.
FedEx, the second-largest U.S. package delivery service, said in a regulatory filing last month it might have to pay $319 million in taxes and penalties plus interest for 2002 for misclassifying the contractors.
The IRS is reviewing calendar years 2004 through 2006 for similar issues, FedEx said.
The drivers want to use the IRS decision as leverage in dozens of lawsuits seeking hundreds of millions of dollars, claiming the company exerts control over them as if they were full-time workers without paying full-time benefits.
The cases are consolidated in federal court in South Bend, Ind.
''The IRS determination demonstrates that on the merits, plaintiffs can offer and prove by common evidence that the drivers are legally employees, not independent contractors,'' the plaintiffs said in a request for ''judicial notice,'' filed Wednesday to U.S. District Judge Robert Miller.
FedEx said there were ''mischaracterizations'' in the plaintiffs' filing.
One case is certified as a nationwide class action and dozens of others are before Miller for similar consideration.
Memphis, Tenn.-based FedEx is appealing the certification of one case to the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which also has the plaintiff's request to note the IRS finding.
FedEx told the appeals court in a letter the IRS finding is preliminary, not binding, and reverses a 1994 decision validating its contractor policy.
FedEx said in a statement Thursday that the company has ''strong defenses to the IRS's tentative assessment and will vigorously defend our position, as we continue to believe that FedEx Ground's owner-operators are independent contractors and that no loss is probable.''
FedEx had legal setbacks related to its ground-delivery contractor policy in 2007.
In December, Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley fined FedEx $190,000 for what she called intentionally misclassifying 13 drivers as contractors.
The California Supreme Court in November upheld a trial court decision that single-route contractors in that state were full-time workers.
FedEx defends its contractor system as an opportunity for drivers to be entrepreneurs. Multi-route contractors can hire their own workers.
The company discontinued single-route contract drivers in California after the courts sided with the drivers.
FedEx Corp. contract drivers suing the company for pay and benefits asked federal judges to consider an Internal Revenue Service preliminary decision that they may be regarded as full-time employees for 2002 tax purposes.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
