Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Officials: NYer Had 20 Dead Dogs Buried in Yard

The Heldenfiles:
Tuesday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
First and 10: Some ideas for a better second half

Akron Zips:
MAC Roundtable

Tribe Matters:
Indians announce spring dates

Cleveland Browns:
Mangini doesn't name a quarterback

Kent State Sports:
Bye week coming at good time for Flashes

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Shaq: It’s All About Winning Championships

Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes Roll 100-60 / Season Outlook

Varsity Letters:
Report: Walsh baseball player commits

All Da King's Men:
More On The Fort Hood Jihadist

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Dems Message To Women: Don't Enjoy The Sex

Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (63) Commonwealth Fund Report on Primary Care

See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler

Car Chase:
Clock Tender- Extending the Life of Collector Car Clocks

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Rumors: Akron Starbucks Closing

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.

Sound Check:
Aeromsith looking for new singer as Steven Tyler contemplates solo career

HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio

Akron Gamer:
Video: 'Modern Warfare 2' hits the streets

Employers need to be consistent on layoff criteria

Companies should use honest, clear message when cutting labor force

By Marcia Heroux Pounds
South Florida Sun-Sentinel

Published on Sunday, Jul 06, 2008

FORT LAUDERDALE, FLA.: A couple of summers ago, RadioShack got the wrong kind of publicity when it used e-mail to notify more than 400 employees in Fort Worth, Texas, they had lost their jobs. The company defended the method at the time, saying employees were directed by e-mail to talk with human resources for further information.

Still, the misstep was ridiculed as heartless in the media and on late-night TV.

''We've come a long way in terms of sensitivity,'' said Thomas Shea, chief executive of Right Management's Florida/Caribbean region, which offers career-transition services. ''Companies have learned the consequences of not handling it well.''

In these tough economic times, when some companies are forced to scale back their labor force, how can they handle it in a way that saves face for their workers and doesn't demoralize the remaining staff?

''There's no good way to lay somebody off,'' said John Challenger, chief executive of Challenger, Gray & Christmas, a Chicago placement firm. ''Employers can try to minimize the feelings of anger and betrayal. It's not only the right thing to do, but it sends a message to the organization: 'We had to make these layoffs but we tried to do them in a way that respects people.' ''

In a planned layoff, the worker's direct manager or supervisor should thank the employee for his or her time of service and explain the layoff decision is economic rather than personal.

''What you're looking for is consistency in message, brief and to the point. Don't drag out the notification meeting,'' Shea said. ''When an employee is in a state of shock or disbelief, he is not absorbing.''

The manager needs to say the layoff is a business decision and to avoid getting into a debate or argument. The employee then should be directed to human resources or the outplacement service to talk about severance, benefits and career transition.

''The problems occur when a manager mixes up a performance review with a termination,'' he said. It's not a time, for example, for a supervisor to talk with the worker about what he or she could have done better over the years.

Employers can best prepare their workers for a layoff by being honest and consistent in their message.

''It's the unknowns that kill you, not the facts,'' Shea said.

Anyway, trying to keep a planned layoff secret is nearly impossible with the Internet, he said. ''What gets employees upset is when they feel they're not being given all the information they could.''

Unclear criteria used to choose who is laid off also can cause bitter feelings among employees.

Last month's Supreme Court ruling on a case involving age discrimination in the work force is likely to have an effect on how employers choose workers to lay off.

''It was a shifting of the burden,'' said Sheila Cesarano, a labor lawyer with Shutts & Bowen in Miami. ''It's a big change in how employers have to approach layoffs.

''Now they're going to have to be the ones coming forward with reasonable explanations with the selection process,'' she said.

Cesarano recommends employers have objective criteria before selecting employees for a layoff. For example, she said, ''employers may have five factors equally weighted or one 50 percent weighted.''

Mark Zelek, a labor lawyer with Morgan, Lewis & Bockius in Miami, said seniority, education and critical skills could be criteria used to retain employees for mid- to higher-level jobs. Be careful with performance reviews, however. If employers go back more than a few years, they're on ''less firm ground,'' he said.

In either circumstance, though, employers need to take a snapshot of their work force before and after the layoff, and make sure the ''after'' doesn't look too different, the lawyers say. Employers want to avoid targeting any single demographic group in the work force.

FORT LAUDERDALE, FLA.: A couple of summers ago, RadioShack got the wrong kind of publicity when it used e-mail to notify more than 400 employees in Fort Worth, Texas, they had lost their jobs. The company defended the method at the time, saying employees were directed by e-mail to talk with human resources for further information.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button















Most Commented Stories