Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Akron judge Linda Kersker dies
DiLullo's closes doors after 63 years
Portage man beaten at home, robbed of coins
Akron police arrest murder suspect within an hour
Call center to cut 250 jobs in Akron
Rib, White and Blue is festival of tastes
Man fit for trial in rape of girl, 2
Powerful sedative found in Michael Jackson's home
Blogs:
Pets:
Summit teams up with Rescue Waggin' to save dogs
The Heldenfiles:
I Hate "More To Love"
Patrick McManamon:
Ron Artest goes to the Lakers
Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Northern Illinois
Browns Bulletin:
Single-game ticket sales begin July 11
Tribe Matters:
Tribe needs to slow down opponents
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana
Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Updated: Free Agency: Another Gone - Apparently
All Da King's Men:
IPCC Already Wrong About Global Warming
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Wow….Sarah Palin Resigns Governorship
Akron Law Café:
Abraham Lincoln and the Fourth of July
Varsity Letters:
Highland senior receives honor
See Jane Style:
Picnic Wear
Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Hate Crime in Fort Worth Texas: "That F***t had it Coming"
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Linda asks-where is the Ohio Chautauqua?
Sound Check:
Rundgren fans rejoice!: Second night of AWATS at The Civic added
HRLite House:
Sport Psychology and Performance Consulting
Akron Gamer:
Hot link: Best of Nintendo at E3
Fees, high tax rates keep sub-accounts lagging. Low-cost, tax-efficient index funds better choice
Published on Monday, Aug 25, 2008
In spite of these disadvantages, a hardworking sales force trudges on and racks up big-time sales — $41.6 billion in the first quarter of this year. The sales for the quarter brought the total assets in variable annuities to nearly $1.4 trillion.
That's a lot of retirement savings.
And there's the rub.
Variable annuities transfer enormous amounts of spendable investment returns from investors to the insurance industry and its sales force. Using the alternative that I have suggested for years — low-cost and tax-efficient index funds — would save the investing public billions of dollars. With an average cost difference of about 1.8 percent a year, a cool $25.2 billion a year is fattening the insurance industry rather than investors.
Promises of tax deferral and expert management notwithstanding, variable annuity sub-accounts (the individual funds that investors choose inside the insurance contract) continue to trail a simple index. They did this in the worst period for index investing that I can remember. Over the last three- and five-year periods, respectively, the Vanguard 500 Index fund has beaten only 52 percent and 53 percent of its actively managed mutual-fund peers. It typically beats about 70 percent of its actively managed peers.
So here is the investment score.
Over the 10 years ending June 30, the Vanguard 500 index fund (ticker symbol: VFINX) returned 2.81 percent annually, while the average domestic, large-blend variable annuity sub-account returned 2.02 percent. Vanguard's Total International equity fund
(ticker: VGTSX) returned 6.94 percent, compared with 6.31 percent for the average international equity sub-account. And Vanguard's Total Bond fund (ticker: VBMFX) returned 5.42 percent, compared with 4.06 percent for the average managed sub-account that invested in bonds.
The odds of having an adviser who could pick a winning fund improved over previous years. But they are still seriously against you. With only 1,318 of 5,488 large-blend sub-accounts beating the Vanguard 500 Index fund, you had only a 24 percent chance of doing better than the index. In international sub-accounts, only 2,796 of 7,555 beat the Vanguard Total International fund, so you had only a 37 percent chance of doing better. And in fixed-income, only 129 of 2,329 sub-accounts beat the Vanguard Total Bond fund, so you had only a 5 percent chance of doing better. Basically, the deck is loaded against the investor.
Ironically, the accompanying chart's figures make the performance of variable annuity investments look better than they really are.
Why? They don't consider taxes.
When you invest in equities directly, dividends and capital gains are taxed at a maximum of 15 percent. Put the same investment inside a variable annuity contract, and the accumulated dividends and capital gains will be taxed as ordinary income upon withdrawal. Calculate what you'd have after paying taxes, as I did using Morningstar Principia, and only 12.4 percent of all variable annuity, large-blend sub-accounts did better than the Vanguard 500 Index fund over the last 10 years.
It would be different for bond funds, right?
Yes, but no.
Had you invested $10,000 in Vanguard Total Bond fund 10 years ago, you would have earned 5.42 percent annually — before taxes. Paying taxes each year at a 25 percent rate would have taken your return down to 4.05 percent, free and clear. Your account would be worth $14,871.
The average variable annuity bond sub-account earned 4.06 percent, before taxes. So the same investment would be worth $14,888 before taxes — and $13,666 after taxes. That's $1,205 less than the investment that had no tax deferral.
How can this be? Simple: High fees and tax disadvantages.
Questions about personal finance and investments may be sent by e-mail to scott@scottburns.com or by fax to 505-424-0938. The Web site is http://www.scottburns.com. Questions of general interest will be answered in future columns and on the Web site.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
