Events Calendar
In This Section
Stocks zigzag after rally as the dollar rises
Job openings remain close to record-lows
Fed officials warn weak recovery won't spur jobs
Work force evolves, falters since 1982
Web sites offer help in finding scholarships
Refinance before low rates rise again
Microsoft to upgrade portal to boost Bing
Most Read Stories
Suitcase causes bomb scare at Akron bus terminal
Akron City Council OKs higher speed on I-77
Chapel Hill isn't rolling right along
Motorcyclist killed, wife injured in Stark County crash
New eateries expand menu of options
Man says he was punched, robbed by 3 people in parking lot
Patrick McManamon: Here's what the Browns should try the rest of the season
Louisville athlete commits to play for Boston College
Family found dead in Ohio home
Blogs:
Pets:
It Takes All Kinds
The Heldenfiles:
Tuesday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
An interesting thought from a reader
Akron Zips:
Akron vs. Mount Union — Liveblog
Tribe Matters:
Indians announce spring dates
Cleveland Browns:
Mangini doesn't name a quarterback
Kent State Sports:
Flashes interested in another Cincinnati player
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Shaq: It’s All About Winning Championships
Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes Roll 100-60 / Season Outlook
Varsity Letters:
Report: Walsh baseball player commits
All Da King's Men:
More On The Fort Hood Jihadist
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Simply Incapable of Telling The Truth
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (63) Commonwealth Fund Report on Primary Care
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Clock Tender- Extending the Life of Collector Car Clocks
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Rumors: Akron Starbucks Closing
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
Aeromsith looking for new singer as Steven Tyler contemplates solo career
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
Video: 'Modern Warfare 2' hits the streets
Fees, high tax rates keep sub-accounts lagging. Low-cost, tax-efficient index funds better choice
Published on Monday, Aug 25, 2008
In spite of these disadvantages, a hardworking sales force trudges on and racks up big-time sales — $41.6 billion in the first quarter of this year. The sales for the quarter brought the total assets in variable annuities to nearly $1.4 trillion.
That's a lot of retirement savings.
And there's the rub.
Variable annuities transfer enormous amounts of spendable investment returns from investors to the insurance industry and its sales force. Using the alternative that I have suggested for years — low-cost and tax-efficient index funds — would save the investing public billions of dollars. With an average cost difference of about 1.8 percent a year, a cool $25.2 billion a year is fattening the insurance industry rather than investors.
Promises of tax deferral and expert management notwithstanding, variable annuity sub-accounts (the individual funds that investors choose inside the insurance contract) continue to trail a simple index. They did this in the worst period for index investing that I can remember. Over the last three- and five-year periods, respectively, the Vanguard 500 Index fund has beaten only 52 percent and 53 percent of its actively managed mutual-fund peers. It typically beats about 70 percent of its actively managed peers.
So here is the investment score.
Over the 10 years ending June 30, the Vanguard 500 index fund (ticker symbol: VFINX) returned 2.81 percent annually, while the average domestic, large-blend variable annuity sub-account returned 2.02 percent. Vanguard's Total International equity fund
(ticker: VGTSX) returned 6.94 percent, compared with 6.31 percent for the average international equity sub-account. And Vanguard's Total Bond fund (ticker: VBMFX) returned 5.42 percent, compared with 4.06 percent for the average managed sub-account that invested in bonds.
The odds of having an adviser who could pick a winning fund improved over previous years. But they are still seriously against you. With only 1,318 of 5,488 large-blend sub-accounts beating the Vanguard 500 Index fund, you had only a 24 percent chance of doing better than the index. In international sub-accounts, only 2,796 of 7,555 beat the Vanguard Total International fund, so you had only a 37 percent chance of doing better. And in fixed-income, only 129 of 2,329 sub-accounts beat the Vanguard Total Bond fund, so you had only a 5 percent chance of doing better. Basically, the deck is loaded against the investor.
Ironically, the accompanying chart's figures make the performance of variable annuity investments look better than they really are.
Why? They don't consider taxes.
When you invest in equities directly, dividends and capital gains are taxed at a maximum of 15 percent. Put the same investment inside a variable annuity contract, and the accumulated dividends and capital gains will be taxed as ordinary income upon withdrawal. Calculate what you'd have after paying taxes, as I did using Morningstar Principia, and only 12.4 percent of all variable annuity, large-blend sub-accounts did better than the Vanguard 500 Index fund over the last 10 years.
It would be different for bond funds, right?
Yes, but no.
Had you invested $10,000 in Vanguard Total Bond fund 10 years ago, you would have earned 5.42 percent annually — before taxes. Paying taxes each year at a 25 percent rate would have taken your return down to 4.05 percent, free and clear. Your account would be worth $14,871.
The average variable annuity bond sub-account earned 4.06 percent, before taxes. So the same investment would be worth $14,888 before taxes — and $13,666 after taxes. That's $1,205 less than the investment that had no tax deferral.
How can this be? Simple: High fees and tax disadvantages.
Questions about personal finance and investments may be sent by e-mail to scott@scottburns.com or by fax to 505-424-0938. The Web site is http://www.scottburns.com. Questions of general interest will be answered in future columns and on the Web site.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
