Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
It Takes All Kinds

The Heldenfiles:
Tuesday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
An interesting thought from a reader

Akron Zips:
Akron vs. Mount Union — Liveblog

Tribe Matters:
Indians announce spring dates

Cleveland Browns:
Mangini doesn't name a quarterback

Kent State Sports:
Flashes interested in another Cincinnati player

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Shaq: It’s All About Winning Championships

Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes Roll 100-60 / Season Outlook

Varsity Letters:
Report: Walsh baseball player commits

All Da King's Men:
More On The Fort Hood Jihadist

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Simply Incapable of Telling The Truth

Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (63) Commonwealth Fund Report on Primary Care

See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler

Car Chase:
Clock Tender- Extending the Life of Collector Car Clocks

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Rumors: Akron Starbucks Closing

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.

Sound Check:
Aeromsith looking for new singer as Steven Tyler contemplates solo career

HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio

Akron Gamer:
Video: 'Modern Warfare 2' hits the streets

Fannie, Freddie Mac face federal takeover

Intervention to be costly for taxpayers, probably won't solve all problems

By Gretchen Morgenson
and Charles Duhigg
New York Times

A federal government takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, expected to be announced today, probably will be among the most expensive rescues ever financed by taxpayers.

While it is not yet possible to calculate the cost of the government's intervention, it could rise into tens of billions of dollars.

Already, the housing crisis has cost investors and consumers hundreds of billions of dollars.

The big question is whether the government's move to take over Fannie and Freddie will restore investor confidence in the nation's credit markets, help stabilize the stock market and keep loans flowing to creditworthy borrowers.

The plan to take over Fannie and Freddie came together hurriedly after advisers poring over the companies' books for the Treasury Department concluded that Freddie's accounting methods had overstated its capital cushion, according to regulatory officials briefed on the mat
ter.

The proposal to place both companies, which own or back $5.3 trillion in mortgages, into a government-run conservatorship also grew out of deep concern among foreign investors that the companies' debt might not be repaid. Falling home prices, which are expected to lead to more defaults among the mortgages held or guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie, contributed to the urgency, regulators said.

The details of the deal have not fully emerged, but it appears that investors who own the companies' common stock will be virtually wiped out; preferred shareholders, who have priority over other shareholders, may also end up with little.

Holders of debt, including many foreign central banks, are expected to receive government backing. Top executives of both companies will be pushed out, according to those briefed on the plan.

The takeover comes on the heels of a rescue of the investment bank Bear Stearns, which was sold to JPMorgan Chase in a deal backed by taxpayer dollars.

Candidates' support

Both presidential nominees expressed support for the takeover. Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., said as he campaigned in Indiana that not acting could place the housing market in further distress.

''These entities are so big and they are so tied into the housing market that it is probably true that we have to take steps to make sure they don't just collapse,'' Obama told an audience in Terre Haute on Saturday. But he added that the government needed to take steps to guard against Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac ultimately profiting from the government assistance.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., has long been critical of the mortgage finance giants.

His running mate, Gov. Sarah Palin, spoke out from a rally in Colorado Springs.

''Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, they've gotten too big and too expensive to the taxpayers,'' Palin said. ''The McCain-Palin administration will make them smaller and smarter and more effective for homeowners who need help.''

Good news, bad news

Fannie and Freddie, by buying mortgages, provide banks and other financial institutions with fresh money to make new loans, a vital lubricant for the housing and credit markets.

As a result of the government's intervention, the cost of borrowing for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac should decline, because the government will be insuring their debts. Equally important, because the government is backing the companies, they will continue to buy and sell home loans.

But the plan will probably do little to stop home prices from falling. And foreclosures are almost certain to rise.

Just a week ago, Treasury officials were still considering a wide variety of options for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, ranging from doing nothing to taking over the companies completely, according to people with knowledge of the discussions.

Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson, who won authority from Congress last month to use tax money to bolster the companies, said he hoped never to use that power.

Last week, advisers from Morgan Stanley hired by the Treasury Department concluded Freddie Mac's capital position was worse than initially imagined, according to people briefed on the findings. The company had made decisions that, while not necessarily in violation of accounting rules, had the effect of overstating the company's capital resources and financial stability.

On Friday, executives from Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac were ordered to appear in the offices of their regulator, James Lockhart, in separate meetings, and were told that regulators were exercising their authority to place the companies in conservatorship.

Details of those plans continued to be worked out Saturday.

A federal government takeover of mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, expected to be announced today, probably will be among the most expensive rescues ever financed by taxpayers.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


Dennis

Posted 10:16 AM, 09/07/2008

executives robbed the companies over the last five years....while bush slept!


lowrider54
barberton, oh

Posted 10:43 AM, 09/07/2008

What's going to happen to us shareholders of Fannie May if this deal goes through ? R we holding worthless paper and or shares ? The Fed. certainly aren't looking at the best interest of it's shareholders, that's a given !!


May Fong
akron, oh

Posted 11:13 AM, 09/07/2008

I wouldnt want to be a shareholder.... Unless your going to buy in when it bottoms out from the federal takeover. Hoping it will go back up to a decent level.


dmanworking

Posted 02:36 PM, 09/07/2008

Your shares are already worthless! What are they, under $5.00? If you own them, you should have sold them months and months ago!


dmanworking

Posted 02:38 PM, 09/07/2008

so dennis, is bush the all seeing eye now? I never knew as President, his job was to audit companies....thanks for your great insight


May Fong
akron, oh

Posted 07:02 PM, 09/07/2008

Didnt W have a few companies that went belly up?


DavidT
m, m

Posted 08:36 PM, 09/07/2008

and the CEO still enjoys his $38 million pay, while we pay to bail out for his poor judgement. Maybe some of his paycheck could help cover cost of the bailout ??
















Most Commented Stories