Events Calendar
In This Section
Reports on consumer confidence, GDP tug at stocks
Facebook creates dual-class stock structure
Consumer group warns about toy hazards
Americans gloomy on economy heading into holidays
Banks earn $2.8 billion in third quarter; insurance fund in the red
Akron, Summit County jobless rates increase
Home prices rise for fourth month in a row
Most Read Stories
2 men shot during party in Fairlawn
Cancellation of Christmas not an option
Akron man killed in crash on his street
Several people hurt in Akron crash
Victim of beating in Kent last week is declared dead at Akron hospital
Akron Children's Hospital CEO, wife announce $1 million gift to support research
Police: Pennsylvania man killed misbehaving puppy before Steelers game
Akron Circle K store robbed for second time this month
KSU suspends basketball player
Police accuse bank robbery suspect of gobbling up note (with dashcam video)
Blogs:
Pets:
A Dog Named Christmas – Pet for the Holidays
The Heldenfiles:
Viewing Notes
Patrick McManamon:
Of pass interference and alleged "fake" injuries
Akron Zips:
No. 1 Akron to play Stanford next
Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster
Cleveland Browns:
Audio: Mangini disputes Poteat call, accuses Lions of faking injuries
Kent State Sports:
Flashes travel to Florida Atlantic
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeye Football – Present and Future
Varsity Letters:
Gulley to visit Central Michigan in December
All Da King's Men:
The Onion, By Any Other Name…
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Glaring Contradictions
Akron Law Café:
Don't Try to Have Fun if you are Depressed
See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic
Car Chase:
What Automotive Thing Are You Thankful For?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Faye Dunaway to be Evicted?
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Monique asks how to get tickets for the Polar Express.
Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why I am Glad I live in NEO
Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go
For those worried about losing thousands in life savings to long-term care facility, policy's expense is worth it
By Dave Carpenter
Associated Press
POSTED: 06:46 a.m. EDT, Sep 22, 2008
CHICAGO: Joyce Smith visited friends recently at a modern nursing home that made her thankful she has long-term care insurance. With relatively plush conditions, including large private rooms and lots of space and privacy, this was the type of safety net she could live with someday.
Turning to her husband, she said: ''You keep paying that long-term care, Harry!''
While the Green Valley, Ariz., couple are healthy and hope they are years away from filing a claim, they figure they'll end up in much better hands thanks to the long-term care policy they secured six years ago when Harry was 54 and Joyce was 60. They acted after watching Joyce's mother, Gladys, fall ill and go into a nursing home without such protection, draining her life savings of $200,000 in 21/2 years.
''If you're able to, you should have it,'' Joyce says of the coverage. She takes comfort in knowing that she and her husband will be able to provide for any daily assistance they might need in later years.
The Smiths are among 8 million Americans with long-term care insurance — an area where insurers expect big growth as baby boomers zero in on their senior years.
The projections are high because the reality is that about 70 percent of people over 65 will require some type of long-term care services during their lifetime, according to the National Clearinghouse for Long-Term Care Information. It might come at any age, actually; 40 percent of people currently receiving long-term care are 64 or younger.
But adding a significant extra cost can be daunting, especially at a time when many are focused on saving for retirement.
So can figuring out what level of benefits you want and how long a period to pay for. Most people get three, four or five years of coverage, because only 20 percent of today's 65-year-olds will need care for more than five years. The more you sign up for, the higher the cost.
The price varies widely based on age, policy type, benefit level and number of years purchased, among other things, and can range from hundreds to thousands of dollars a year. Someone seeking protection equal to today's average annual cost of care, about $55,000, would pay $1,064 a year for a standard policy purchased at age 55 or $2,013 for a similar policy at age 65, according to the American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance, an industry group.
As a benchmark, Consumer Reports Money Adviser recently noted that, in general, coverage may be largely unaffordable for people with a net worth below $200,000 to $300,000, not including their home. If you're in that category, you will likely have to rely on government programs for any long-term care, which can cost you your choice of care facilities and, like Gladys, all your savings.
Other drawbacks also exist, including the limits and conditions of many policies.
But foregoing it is risky. Retiree health costs can be enormous without even factoring in the savings needed to cover long-term care expenses.
A man retiring at 65 in 2008 will need anywhere from $64,000 to $159,000 in savings to cover health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses in retirement just for a 50 percent chance of having enough money, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, and $196,000 to $331,000 for a 90 percent chance.
A woman the same age would need $86,000 to $184,000 for a 50-50 chance and $223,000 to $390,000 to have a 90 percent chance.
The Smiths, who are retired, pay $4,995 a year for a joint policy with MassMutual that will provide extensive long-term care benefits for an unlimited time — now rare — when they become eligible by virtue of needing help with daily living activities. They consider themselves fortunate they locked in for that amount, having been told by their agent recently that it might cost triple the amount today.
''It's one of those insurance products that's kind of difficult to understand,'' says Harry, a retired firefighter. ''I studied it for nearly a year. . . . But it gives you peace of mind to have it.''
Having the insurance also protects children from a potentially heavy burden.
''We've had friends tell us, 'We're not getting long-term care, let the kids take care of us,' '' says Joyce, who with her husband has two daughters and a son. ''Well, that's not being very nice to the children. We don't want our kids to have to take care of us.''
On the Internet: National Clearinghouse for Long-Term Care Information: http://www.longtermcare.gov; American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance: http://www.aaltci.org.
CHICAGO: Joyce Smith visited friends recently at a modern nursing home that made her thankful she has long-term care insurance. With relatively plush conditions, including large private rooms and lots of space and privacy, this was the type of safety net she could live with someday.
Turning to her husband, she said: ''You keep paying that long-term care, Harry!''
While the Green Valley, Ariz., couple are healthy and hope they are years away from filing a claim, they figure they'll end up in much better hands thanks to the long-term care policy they secured six years ago when Harry was 54 and Joyce was 60. They acted after watching Joyce's mother, Gladys, fall ill and go into a nursing home without such protection, draining her life savings of $200,000 in 21/2 years.
''If you're able to, you should have it,'' Joyce says of the coverage. She takes comfort in knowing that she and her husband will be able to provide for any daily assistance they might need in later years.
The Smiths are among 8 million Americans with long-term care insurance — an area where insurers expect big growth as baby boomers zero in on their senior years.
The projections are high because the reality is that about 70 percent of people over 65 will require some type of long-term care services during their lifetime, according to the National Clearinghouse for Long-Term Care Information. It might come at any age, actually; 40 percent of people currently receiving long-term care are 64 or younger.
But adding a significant extra cost can be daunting, especially at a time when many are focused on saving for retirement.
So can figuring out what level of benefits you want and how long a period to pay for. Most people get three, four or five years of coverage, because only 20 percent of today's 65-year-olds will need care for more than five years. The more you sign up for, the higher the cost.
The price varies widely based on age, policy type, benefit level and number of years purchased, among other things, and can range from hundreds to thousands of dollars a year. Someone seeking protection equal to today's average annual cost of care, about $55,000, would pay $1,064 a year for a standard policy purchased at age 55 or $2,013 for a similar policy at age 65, according to the American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance, an industry group.
As a benchmark, Consumer Reports Money Adviser recently noted that, in general, coverage may be largely unaffordable for people with a net worth below $200,000 to $300,000, not including their home. If you're in that category, you will likely have to rely on government programs for any long-term care, which can cost you your choice of care facilities and, like Gladys, all your savings.
Other drawbacks also exist, including the limits and conditions of many policies.
But foregoing it is risky. Retiree health costs can be enormous without even factoring in the savings needed to cover long-term care expenses.
A man retiring at 65 in 2008 will need anywhere from $64,000 to $159,000 in savings to cover health insurance premiums and out-of-pocket expenses in retirement just for a 50 percent chance of having enough money, according to the Employee Benefit Research Institute, and $196,000 to $331,000 for a 90 percent chance.
A woman the same age would need $86,000 to $184,000 for a 50-50 chance and $223,000 to $390,000 to have a 90 percent chance.
The Smiths, who are retired, pay $4,995 a year for a joint policy with MassMutual that will provide extensive long-term care benefits for an unlimited time — now rare — when they become eligible by virtue of needing help with daily living activities. They consider themselves fortunate they locked in for that amount, having been told by their agent recently that it might cost triple the amount today.
''It's one of those insurance products that's kind of difficult to understand,'' says Harry, a retired firefighter. ''I studied it for nearly a year. . . . But it gives you peace of mind to have it.''
Having the insurance also protects children from a potentially heavy burden.
''We've had friends tell us, 'We're not getting long-term care, let the kids take care of us,' '' says Joyce, who with her husband has two daughters and a son. ''Well, that's not being very nice to the children. We don't want our kids to have to take care of us.''
On the Internet: National Clearinghouse for Long-Term Care Information: http://www.longtermcare.gov; American Association for Long-Term Care Insurance: http://www.aaltci.org.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
