Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Summit teams up with Rescue Waggin' to save dogs

The Heldenfiles:
I Hate "More To Love"

Patrick McManamon:
Anyone notice this?

Akron Zips:
Basketball schedule nearing completion

Browns Bulletin:
Single-game ticket sales begin July 11

Tribe Matters:
Tribe adds fourth new reliever

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana

Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Free Agency: Another Gone - Apparently

All Da King's Men:
IPCC Already Wrong About Global Warming

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Anti-Sex

Akron Law Café:
Star Powered Director Primacy

Varsity Letters:
Highland senior receives honor

See Jane Style:
Picnic Wear

Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Hate Crime in Fort Worth Texas: "That F***t had it Coming"

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Michael asks where is the new Safari Adventure in Sandusky?

Sound Check:
Rundgren fans rejoice!: Second night of AWATS at The Civic added

HRLite House:
Sport Psychology and Performance Consulting

Akron Gamer:
Hot link: Best of Nintendo at E3

Downside for retirees with living benefits

Alternative products will offer better return

Published on Monday, Nov 03, 2008

Retiring is easy. The hard part is having a steady income from your investments. Many who retired in 1999, for instance, regretted it as the stock market fell in the next three years. Today, after a year of spectacular declines for stocks around the world, millions of soon-to-retire boomers are wondering what to do.

Enter the allure of living benefits.

These were rare as recently as 2000, and now the National Association for Variable Annuities says that at least 85 percent of all VA contracts now have some form of living benefit option.

Until this innovation, a variable annuity had just two benefits: tax-deferral of all gains and a death benefit. The contract guaranteed that your heirs would receive at least as much as your original investment — but you had to die first.

Living benefits are a whole new deal. They contractually guarantee that you can receive an income for life, regardless of the value of your underlying account. The contracts call this provision a ''guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit'' (GMWB). They can be further sweetened by another benefit, the ''guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit'' (GMAB). This guarantees that no matter what the markets have done, your account will grow at a certain percentage rate (usually 5 to 7 percent) for a period of time. Better still, your guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit can be based on that guarantee.

Sounds like a great deal, right? A guaranteed minimum return and a guaranteed payout, plus lots of upside potential if the markets happen to soar. What's not to like?

Plenty.

Here's an example. You're 65, just retired, and you like the idea of a guaranteed 5 percent for life. You invest $100,000 in a typical contract. You start drawing $5,000 a year. You'll have that income for life regardless of what the markets do.

In fact, you can buy the same promise — $5,000 a year for life — for only $61,778.

How? Just purchase another insurance product, an immediate life annuity. By choosing the living benefits option, you have effectively given the insurance company 38 percent of your money. To put the loss in some perspective, it's like volunteering for a loss that is about the same size as the decline in the S&P 500 over the last year.

But what about all that upside potential?

Well, it's just that: potential. The 38 percent of your money that you lost is here, now and real. With typical
contract costs of about 3 percent a year, you will enjoy account growth only when your gross return exceeds 8 percent a year. In other words, contract fees and your withdrawals are likely to devour most of the upside potential.

Now let's see if living benefits are a better deal if they are combined with a guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit. Suppose you are 55 years old. You intend to retire at 65. You will leave your investment untouched for 10 years. If you invest $100,000 today and get a guaranteed minimum accumulation benefit (GMAB) as well as a guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefit for life (GMWB), what happens?

With a guaranteed return of 5 percent, compounded, your $100,000 investment will grow to an account value of $162,889 in 10 years. That value cannot be withdrawn in a lump sum. It is only the basis for calculating the annual income you can withdraw for life. At 5 percent, that's $8,144 a year, or $679 a month.

So, how much would it cost to have the same lifetime income guarantee in an immediate life annuity? Answer: About $100,593.

Fortunately, you don't have to have that amount today. You just need it 10 years from now. If you invest only $61,755 today in a CD-like fixed-income annuity with a yield of 5 percent, you'll have the $100,593 when you need it. Recently, I found 17 contracts with yields over 5 percent on http://www.annuityadvantage.com.

Again, if you choose living benefits rather than alternative insurance products, you have effectively gifted the insurance company 38 percent of your money. The enthusiastic, high-commission salesperson who likes living benefits so much has turned your cash into his gold.

Why does it turn out so badly?

Simple. The guaranteed withdrawal rates are much lower than the percentage payouts on life annuities. While a 65-year-old man can withdraw at only 5 percent in a typical living benefits contract, a life annuity would pay at 8.1 percent a year.

Big difference.

Questions about personal finance and investments may be sent by e-mail to scott scott@burns.com or by fax to 505-424-0938. Please visit my Web site at www.scottburns.com to comment on any of my articles, find referenced Web links or to discuss personal finance topics on my forums. Questions of general interest will be answered in future columns and on my Web site.

Retiring is easy. The hard part is having a steady income from your investments. Many who retired in 1999, for instance, regretted it as the stock market fell in the next three years. Today, after a year of spectacular declines for stocks around the world, millions of soon-to-retire boomers are wondering what to do.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button















Most Commented Stories