Events Calendar
In This Section
Stocks zigzag after rally as the dollar rises
Job openings remain close to record-lows
Fed officials warn weak recovery won't spur jobs
Work force evolves, falters since 1982
Web sites offer help in finding scholarships
Refinance before low rates rise again
Microsoft to upgrade portal to boost Bing
Most Read Stories
Suitcase causes bomb scare at Akron bus terminal
Akron City Council OKs higher speed on I-77
Chapel Hill isn't rolling right along
Motorcyclist killed, wife injured in Stark County crash
New eateries expand menu of options
Man says he was punched, robbed by 3 people in parking lot
Patrick McManamon: Here's what the Browns should try the rest of the season
Louisville athlete commits to play for Boston College
Family found dead in Ohio home
Blogs:
Pets:
It Takes All Kinds
The Heldenfiles:
Tuesday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
An interesting thought from a reader
Akron Zips:
Akron vs. Mount Union — Liveblog
Tribe Matters:
Indians announce spring dates
Cleveland Browns:
Mangini doesn't name a quarterback
Kent State Sports:
Flashes interested in another Cincinnati player
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Shaq: It’s All About Winning Championships
Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes Roll 100-60 / Season Outlook
Varsity Letters:
Report: Walsh baseball player commits
All Da King's Men:
More On The Fort Hood Jihadist
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Simply Incapable of Telling The Truth
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (63) Commonwealth Fund Report on Primary Care
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Clock Tender- Extending the Life of Collector Car Clocks
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Rumors: Akron Starbucks Closing
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
Aeromsith looking for new singer as Steven Tyler contemplates solo career
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
Video: 'Modern Warfare 2' hits the streets
Silence only feeds rumors about Steve Jobs' health
By Mike Cassidy
San Jose Mercury News
Published on Tuesday, Dec 30, 2008
Steve Jobs needs to take a page from Fidel Castro's book and give a speech.
A big long one. At the Macworld conference next week.
When Fidel was running Cuba and rumors put him at death's door, he'd give a two-hour talk to reassure his subjects. Fidel had the May Day parade. Jobs has Macworld.
But Jobs' people say there will be no Jobs at Macworld 2009. And the last thing the public relations folks at Apple want you to think is that the move has anything to do with Jobs' health. Which is why they won't say a thing about his condition. The longstanding company line? ''Steve's health is a private matter.''
Actually, it isn't.
My health is a private matter. Your health is a private matter. Steve Jobs' health is not a private matter. Steve Jobs' health is Apple's health. When Jobs, a pancreatic cancer survivor, shows up gaunt in public or acknowledges that he is not going to show up in public at all, the company's stock dives.
Jobs has shareholders, employees and, yes, Mac fanatics depending on his continued prosperity and health. Is it odd? Yes, it's very odd. There arguably is not another chief executive in the world who is so closely identified with the company he or she runs.
But it's what Jobs signed up for, along with the jet and company stock. He created the image of Jobs as Apple, and now it's time he live up to it by coming clean about his health.
When Jobs is sick or acting like he might be sick, people care. The blogosphere and news columns begin to fill with buzz and rumors and questions and predictions bordering on obsession.
It's a problem. And it's a problem that Apple has largely brought upon itself.
The company is often politely described as ''controlling'' or ''tight-lipped.''
Actually, the CIA is tight-lipped. Apple is pathologically secretive. Apple is Cuba.
This is a company that will not talk about its co-founder and chief executive's health. This is a company that will not talk about who will step in should Jobs' health fail. Even Fidel had Raul.
It's not that Apple has said nothing about Jobs taking Macworld off. Once word leaked that he would not be attending, the company's publicists explained that Apple was pulling out of the big show after this year's edition, so why bother to send the big guy?
Why? Maybe because it is Apple's last show. Maybe because Jobs is Apple and Apple is Macworld. Maybe because it's what Jobs does — takes to the stage and steals the show, unveiling the iPhone, the thinner MacBook and his thinner self. Maybe because it would be a chance for Jobs to
take a victory lap, to honor the past and to explain in crystal clear terms the future of Apple.
And yes, because it would be a chance to tell us that he is OK or that he is not OK.
Apple's public relations team has said that the company doesn't need Macworld to communicate with its customers anymore. Between Apple Stores and its Web site, they say, the company can reach 100 million consumers.
You might cut other companies in similar situations some slack. But Apple's record of being less than forthcoming has left us to wonder: Is Jobs too sick to attend the January show? Are Apple strategists concerned that he could become too sick by then, or even look too sick by then? Would they rather not deal with the questions and speculation should he show up healthy, but with the sniffles or looking thin or tired?
All fair worries. But we shouldn't really have to be guessing at Apple's motives.
Steve Jobs could clear it all up with a speech. A long one. At Macworld.
Steve Jobs needs to take a page from Fidel Castro's book and give a speech.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
Make the world a better place... punch a Steeler fan in the face, .
Posted 09:32 AM, 12/30/2008
I love how this is a constant source of speculation and rumors, one way or the other, can move the stock 5% in one day. Jobs is definitely a visionary leader, but do people really think Apple doesn't have the organizational capability to function without him?
The Great City in, OH
Posted 11:01 AM, 12/30/2008
Apparently that is what they think! However, one monkey don't stop no show!
Apple is a strong company and if the economy survive then so will Apple!
visbe, Go
Posted 11:04 AM, 12/30/2008
So you don't want Apple to be Apple but more like Fidel Castro except it's Cuba anyway???
Mike, you are one seriously confused chip-on-the-shoulder journo with an axe to grind and no morals to boot. You will do well... in Ohio.
Otherwise, your self-righteous morbid insensitivity is nauseating.
Now that's out of the way, you really should do some more research. Apple is Apple and not anything else. They do things their way not yours and if you had paused a few moments and thought about your post, you might have realised that it just adds more to the Apple Myth book by providing them with more publicity. And it is true - any and all publicity is good publicity... even whining posts like yours.
Hoxsie, RI
Posted 01:38 PM, 12/30/2008
I am a long term stockholder of Apple, Inc. and I like Apple's situation just the way it is without any dividends or foolish stock buy backs that some misguided investors are promoting. Still, I must say I was taken aback by the recent announcement sans Jobs that Jobs would not keynote MacWorld this year. Why didn't Jobs present the info himself. He could have simply told a handful of reporters with their cameras recording that look, I have better things to do for Apple than waste time at MacWorld, so this is going to be the last year there, for a while at least. We just have more meaningful venues elsewhere. That would have served the same end, and shareholders would have been more content with that.
Hoxsie, RI
Posted 01:45 PM, 12/30/2008
OOPS. There is more: If Jobs or any other top honcho is taken ill, I think they owe it to their shareholders to appear with the management team they have in place and tell us that "Look, I am under some treatment, and in my absence Tim and Peter here are going to be administering things and consulting with me just as we have done as a team for several years. I am still at the top of the hill, but its time we give these guys the day to day responsibilities while I spend a little time in the mountains contemplating my navel."
I think people would accept that, understand and appreciate that.
The Great City in, OH
Posted 04:06 PM, 12/30/2008
To notacowboy:
Are you really posting from Sweden or is that just where you are from?
Posted 03:30 PM, 12/31/2008
Here's all anyone needs to know about Steve's health: He could die at any time. Just like any one of us. Eventually, he will die.
By death, illness, age, boardroom coup, or just because he wants to go, Steve can leave the company at any time! Eventually he will leave Apple.
The real question is, what preparations are in place for when that happens. How will Apple maintain continuity of management is the real question. In fact, it's the BETTER question to ask for the long haul, given Jobs' lack of immortality.
Steve likes his privacy. He could go public and explain his health. But to do so now, would be to invite the question to return time and again until he leaves Apple.
I suspect Steve would rather show us that he's put in place a team that will continue to innovate in the same manner for years after he leaves.
It's a relevant conversation to the business, preserves his privacy, and long term trust in Apple.
That may be part in parcel why we're seeing more of other Apple execs in recent Apple announcements, and why Phil is giving this Keynote.
Was the iPhone a success only because of Steve? Would it still have sold the way it has if Phil Schiller was the one who announced it two years ago at
Macworld Expo? I'd like to think the answer is "yes".
Steve did not do this single handedly, and Apple needs to show that by peeling back the curtain on its management, not on Steve's personal health.
Rockland, ME
Posted 03:31 PM, 12/31/2008
Here's all anyone needs to know about Steve's health: He could die at any time. Just like any one of us. Eventually, he will die.
By death, illness, age, boardroom coup, or just because he wants to go, Steve can leave the company at any time! Eventually he will leave Apple.
The real question is, what preparations are in place for when that happens. How will Apple maintain continuity of management is the real question. In fact, it's the BETTER question to ask for the long haul, given Jobs' lack of immortality.
Steve likes his privacy. He could go public and explain his health. But to do so now, would be to invite the question to return time and again until he leaves Apple.
I suspect Steve would rather show us that he's put in place a team that will continue to innovate in the same manner for years after he leaves.
It's a relevant conversation to the business, preserves his privacy, and long term trust in Apple.
That may be part in parcel why we're seeing more of other Apple execs in recent Apple announcements, and why Phil is giving this Keynote.
Was the iPhone a success only because of Steve? Would it still have sold the way it has if Phil Schiller was the one who announced it two years ago at Macworld Expo? I'd like to think the answer is "yes".
Steve did not do this single handedly, and Apple needs to show that by peeling back the curtain on its management, not on Steve's personal health.
