Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Icy roads cause driving headaches throughout area
Akron man is stripped at gunpoint, robbed
2 students found shot to death in Boardman cemetery
Rookie Robiskie shows fans he can catch passes
Fire destroys Perry Township restaurant
Police: 2 moms, kids found dead might be linked
Officer responding to Pennsylvania home disturbance killed
Blogs:
Pets:
Riding an elephant
The Heldenfiles:
Another Road Trip
Patrick McManamon:
Like we needed guys from Detroit to come up with this idea
Akron Zips:
Akron to play North Carolina in national semifinal
Tribe Matters:
Indians quiet thus far at the winter meetings
Cleveland Browns:
Audio: Mangini encouraged by young Browns' play
Kent State Sports:
Kent State RB Flowers to transfer
Cleveland Cavaliers:
The Traveling Music Post: Yes, It’s the Glamorous Life
Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeye Football – Present and Future
Varsity Letters:
Report: Hoobler commits to Indiana
All Da King's Men:
GOP Woes And Public Polls
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Now It's "Gulags"
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (83) Medicare for All and Ben Nelson's Abortion Amendment
See Jane Style:
Do IT this week: Layering
Car Chase:
What Automotive Thing Are You Thankful For?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Loan Modification – You Qualify!
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Carol asks what is the Shawshank Trail?
Sound Check:
On the Town: Top entertainment tips
HRLite House:
Genetic Discrimination
Akron Gamer:
How do I know you have too much time on your hands?
Ruling may bar certain software inventions from patents, could invalidate existing ones
Published on Sunday, Nov 08, 2009
Associated Press
WASHINGTON: The Supreme Court on Monday will explore what types of inventions should be eligible for a patent in a pivotal case that could undermine such legal protections for software.
A ruling that sides with the Patent Office could bar patents on processes and methods of doing business, such as online shopping techniques, medical diagnostic tests and procedures for executing trades on Wall Street. And it might even undercut patents on software.
In a worst-case scenario for the high-tech industry, the ruling could invalidate many software patents or at least make them more difficult to defend in lawsuits. And it could make such patents harder to obtain in the future because software is generally patented as a process for doing something rather than as a physical invention.
''Technology companies care about this case, because it will define what you can and cannot get a patent on,'' said Emery Simon, counselor to the Business Software Alliance, which represents large technology companies including Microsoft Corp. and Intel Corp.
It's impossible to know what products might never have come to market without patent protection for software. But tech companies say these patents have played a critical role in keeping the United States on the cutting edge by giving people control over their inventions for nearly 20 years.
''The software industry would lose an important incentive to innovate if the government ceased issuing software patents,'' warned patent attorney James Carmichael, a former judge on the Patent Office board of appeals.
The roots of the dispute go back to 1997, when inventors Bernard Bilski and Rand Warsaw tried to patent a method of hedging weather-related risk in energy prices.
Some of the best-known business-method patents in technology come out of electronic commerce, including Amazon.com Inc.'s ''1-Click'' tool for completing online purchases and Priceline.com Inc.'s ''Name Your Own Price'' model.
Associated Press
WASHINGTON: The Supreme Court on Monday will explore what types of inventions should be eligible for a patent in a pivotal case that could undermine such legal protections for software.
A ruling that sides with the Patent Office could bar patents on processes and methods of doing business, such as online shopping techniques, medical diagnostic tests and procedures for executing trades on Wall Street. And it might even undercut patents on software.
In a worst-case scenario for the high-tech industry, the ruling could invalidate many software patents or at least make them more difficult to defend in lawsuits. And it could make such patents harder to obtain in the future because software is generally patented as a process for doing something rather than as a physical invention.
''Technology companies care about this case, because it will define what you can and cannot get a patent on,'' said Emery Simon, counselor to the Business Software Alliance, which represents large technology companies including Microsoft Corp. and Intel Corp.
It's impossible to know what products might never have come to market without patent protection for software. But tech companies say these patents have played a critical role in keeping the United States on the cutting edge by giving people control over their inventions for nearly 20 years.
''The software industry would lose an important incentive to innovate if the government ceased issuing software patents,'' warned patent attorney James Carmichael, a former judge on the Patent Office board of appeals.
The roots of the dispute go back to 1997, when inventors Bernard Bilski and Rand Warsaw tried to patent a method of hedging weather-related risk in energy prices.
Some of the best-known business-method patents in technology come out of electronic commerce, including Amazon.com Inc.'s ''1-Click'' tool for completing online purchases and Priceline.com Inc.'s ''Name Your Own Price'' model.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
