Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Blogs:
Akrocentric:
Raw Umber event; Charles Taormina discusses our culture's fledgling publishing renaissance
Akron Aeros:
More rest than needed
Akron Zips:
Taylor advances on ‘Dancing with the Stars’
All Da King's Men:
Irrational On Oil
Balanced Ledger:
Spring football
Blog of Mass Destruction:
"Solidarity"
BokBluster:
Dann Down
Browns Bulletin:
Wright out, Perry in
Cleveland Browns:
Wright faces second marijuana charge
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Reality starting to bite
Kent State Sports:
Third scholarship still looking for a taker
Ohio Politics:
Edwards Endorses
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Is the Lincoln Highway the same as the National Road?
Olympic Dreams - Running:
Oregon Twilight
Patrick McManamon:
Game 5 goes to Boston, and the cheerleaders check in …
Sound Check:
American Idol Vodcast
Tia's Trends:
ICSC Convention - Adventures in Retail!!!
The Heldenfiles:
Lovin' the Feel of the Wheel
The Sports Blitz:
Cleveland Browns - They Love Them! They Really, Really Love Them!
Varsity Letters:
North, Firestone win Auten track and field titles
What's wrong with AMP-Ohio wanting to build the cleanest coal-fired power plant in the state? Practically nothing
Published on Thursday, Oct 11, 2007
Of late, AMP-Ohio has been navigating the lengthy and complex approval process. Among other things, the wholesale supplier of electricity has been pursuing long-term contracts with its member communities as part of arranging financing for the 1,000 megawatt project. It has included a reminder about the care behind the decision to go forward. In 2002, the organization crafted a strategic plan that called for adding substantially to its generation capacity and thus lowering its profile in the wholesale market.
Not everyone is happy with the proposal. Environmental groups have howled, even visited AMP-Ohio communities to argue the organization has erred. The likes of the National Resources Defense Council contend there are better choices, environmentally and economically. As it is, their criticisms largely miss the mark. They also suggest a hard truth about combating climate change.
Wouldn't it be swell if AMP-Ohio in seeking to add such base load could choose from an array of green-friendly alternatives, including wind and solar? That isn't the case. The options are limited, providing insight into why coal and nuclear supply much of the country's electricity. So the landscape will remain for years, even decades.
Might AMP-Ohio have selected a cleaner coal plant? Environmental groups prefer Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC). The technology carries much promise. It remains largely unproved, and it doesn't conform as easily with shifts in base demand. More, AMP-Ohio hardly has opted for a chump. The organization has tapped the Powerspan Corp. of New Hampshire to install an emissions-control system called Electro-Catalytic Oxidation. The result will be the cleanest coal-fired plant in the state by far in reducing emissions of sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and mercury.
If anything, AMP-Ohio deserves credit for embracing a cutting-edge technology, and one with a track record longer than the IGCC alternative.
Environmental groups correctly note that the plant annually will generate roughly 7.3 million tons of carbon dioxide, the primary culprit in global warming. Unfortunately, there isn't yet a technology capable of reducing such emissions. The good thing is, the AMP-Ohio plant will be designed to accommodate such an advance when it arrives. The Clean Air Act calls for power plants to implement the best available technology for curbing harmful emissions. Too often, power companies have ducked and dodged in meeting the requirement. By comparison, AMP-Ohio has stepped up in a big way.
Get the full article here.

