Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Sly children fool exercise study by using dogs

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
Dwayne Wade says no to Cleveland

Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Kent State

Browns Bulletin:
Quick thought on Browns rookies

Tribe Matters:
Now is no time to quit

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana

Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Andy’s Signed According to ESPN

All Da King's Men:
Baby Got Barack !

Blog of Mass Destruction:
As California Goes?

Akron Law Café:
Why do public officials violate Ohio Ethics Laws?

Varsity Letters:
Report: Ontko selects Wisconsin

See Jane Style:
Oh Baby!

Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Closings….Not the Good Kind!

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Margy inquires-when is a Taste of Hudson?

Sound Check:
LeVert II live performance Saturday night — "Dedication" album due July 13,

HRLite House:
DDI One of Best Places to Work

Akron Gamer:
Video game sales drop in May

Why suspend the death penalty?

The problem of mistaken eyewitnesses and false confessions

 

Ohioans may be surprised to learn that the two leading causes of wrongful convictions are false confessions and eyewitnesses mistakenly identifying defendants. The American Bar Association Death Penalty Moratorium Implementation Project shared this observation in its recent assessment of capital punishment in Ohio. It was part of why the project urged the state to reduce the potential for such errors, taking steps to diminish the risk of sending an innocent man or woman to death row.

As it is, the bar evaluation rightly called for Gov. Ted Strickland to suspend capital punishment in the state until further assessment and action allows for improved public confidence in the system.

What can be done?

The bar report gives Ohio credit for already moving in the right direction. Law enforcement officers must complete many hours of precise training that includes work on interrogations and lineups. The courts may admit expert testimony involving the reliability of eyewitness identifications. Roughly two dozen law enforcement agencies in the state ''regularly record some or all'' interrogations, providing a critical check against coerced or false confessions.

The objective should be to build on such efforts. The bar report recommends that the state require all law enforcement agencies to adopt procedures covering identifications and interrogations. That isn't the case now. As part of such procedures, law enforcement agencies should record via videotape all interrogations in homicide cases at police offices, courthouses, detention centers and the like. It isn't expensive. The technology is easy to handle. (Even an audio recording improves the process.)

Similarly, the bar report recommended that the state mandate lineup procedures, ensuring the use of best practices from across the country.

These are relatively simple steps to improve the process of the death penalty. Again, they are not designed to make things easier for the accused. They serve the interests of all Ohioans. They provide an element of protection against an irreversible error, executing an innocent person. The governor should not allow the machinery of capital punishment to grind further without moving ahead on this front.

This is the third in a set of editorials on why Ohio should suspend its death penalty.

 

Ohioans may be surprised to learn that the two leading causes of wrongful convictions are false confessions and eyewitnesses mistakenly identifying defendants. The American Bar Association Death Penalty Moratorium Implementation Project shared this observation in its recent assessment of capital punishment in Ohio. It was part of why the project urged the state to reduce the potential for such errors, taking steps to diminish the risk of sending an innocent man or woman to death row.

As it is, the bar evaluation rightly called for Gov. Ted Strickland to suspend capital punishment in the state until further assessment and action allows for improved public confidence in the system.

What can be done?

The bar report gives Ohio credit for already moving in the right direction. Law enforcement officers must complete many hours of precise training that includes work on interrogations and lineups. The courts may admit expert testimony involving the reliability of eyewitness identifications. Roughly two dozen law enforcement agencies in the state ''regularly record some or all'' interrogations, providing a critical check against coerced or false confessions.

The objective should be to build on such efforts. The bar report recommends that the state require all law enforcement agencies to adopt procedures covering identifications and interrogations. That isn't the case now. As part of such procedures, law enforcement agencies should record via videotape all interrogations in homicide cases at police offices, courthouses, detention centers and the like. It isn't expensive. The technology is easy to handle. (Even an audio recording improves the process.)

Similarly, the bar report recommended that the state mandate lineup procedures, ensuring the use of best practices from across the country.

These are relatively simple steps to improve the process of the death penalty. Again, they are not designed to make things easier for the accused. They serve the interests of all Ohioans. They provide an element of protection against an irreversible error, executing an innocent person. The governor should not allow the machinery of capital punishment to grind further without moving ahead on this front.

This is the third in a set of editorials on why Ohio should suspend its death penalty.



Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories