Container Top
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Akron Docs in Haiti:
Almost home

First Bell - On Education:
21st Century Skills and Akron’s new middle school

Pets:
Lost Mini Schnauzer around Cascade Valley Park

The Heldenfiles:
Fess Parker, R.I.P.

Akron Zips:
Looking back on the season

Tribe Matters:
Cleveland Browns:
Yates latest to re-sign

Balanced Ledger:
How times have changed?

Kent State Sports:
Kent State gears up for WNIT at Michigan

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Chicago Bulls (Green Mascot and All)

Buckeye Blogging:
Bucks High Seed – Turner High Praise

Varsity Letters:
Report: Ohio offers Olack

All Da King's Men:
ObamaCare To Reduce Premiums By 3000% ?

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Pathetic GOP Nullification Attempts

Akron Law Café:
Legal Authority behind the Census OR…

Car Chase:
2010 CONCOURS SEASON IS UPON US

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Deals in Miami?!.

Sound Check:
Willie Nelson & Family coming to the Akron Civic Theatre May 11

See Jane Style:
Who Wore What – The Oscars

HRLite House:
Horses of Courses

Akron Gamer:
Video: Gamers expected to 'reach' for new 'Halo'

Why suspend the death penalty?

The problem of mistaken eyewitnesses and false confessions

 

Ohioans may be surprised to learn that the two leading causes of wrongful convictions are false confessions and eyewitnesses mistakenly identifying defendants. The American Bar Association Death Penalty Moratorium Implementation Project shared this observation in its recent assessment of capital punishment in Ohio. It was part of why the project urged the state to reduce the potential for such errors, taking steps to diminish the risk of sending an innocent man or woman to death row.

As it is, the bar evaluation rightly called for Gov. Ted Strickland to suspend capital punishment in the state until further assessment and action allows for improved public confidence in the system.

What can be done?

The bar report gives Ohio credit for already moving in the right direction. Law enforcement officers must complete many hours of precise training that includes work on interrogations and lineups. The courts may admit expert testimony involving the reliability of eyewitness identifications. Roughly two dozen law enforcement agencies in the state ''regularly record some or all'' interrogations, providing a critical check against coerced or false confessions.

The objective should be to build on such efforts. The bar report recommends that the state require all law enforcement agencies to adopt procedures covering identifications and interrogations. That isn't the case now. As part of such procedures, law enforcement agencies should record via videotape all interrogations in homicide cases at police offices, courthouses, detention centers and the like. It isn't expensive. The technology is easy to handle. (Even an audio recording improves the process.)

Similarly, the bar report recommended that the state mandate lineup procedures, ensuring the use of best practices from across the country.

These are relatively simple steps to improve the process of the death penalty. Again, they are not designed to make things easier for the accused. They serve the interests of all Ohioans. They provide an element of protection against an irreversible error, executing an innocent person. The governor should not allow the machinery of capital punishment to grind further without moving ahead on this front.

This is the third in a set of editorials on why Ohio should suspend its death penalty.

 

Ohioans may be surprised to learn that the two leading causes of wrongful convictions are false confessions and eyewitnesses mistakenly identifying defendants. The American Bar Association Death Penalty Moratorium Implementation Project shared this observation in its recent assessment of capital punishment in Ohio. It was part of why the project urged the state to reduce the potential for such errors, taking steps to diminish the risk of sending an innocent man or woman to death row.

As it is, the bar evaluation rightly called for Gov. Ted Strickland to suspend capital punishment in the state until further assessment and action allows for improved public confidence in the system.

What can be done?

The bar report gives Ohio credit for already moving in the right direction. Law enforcement officers must complete many hours of precise training that includes work on interrogations and lineups. The courts may admit expert testimony involving the reliability of eyewitness identifications. Roughly two dozen law enforcement agencies in the state ''regularly record some or all'' interrogations, providing a critical check against coerced or false confessions.

The objective should be to build on such efforts. The bar report recommends that the state require all law enforcement agencies to adopt procedures covering identifications and interrogations. That isn't the case now. As part of such procedures, law enforcement agencies should record via videotape all interrogations in homicide cases at police offices, courthouses, detention centers and the like. It isn't expensive. The technology is easy to handle. (Even an audio recording improves the process.)

Similarly, the bar report recommended that the state mandate lineup procedures, ensuring the use of best practices from across the country.

These are relatively simple steps to improve the process of the death penalty. Again, they are not designed to make things easier for the accused. They serve the interests of all Ohioans. They provide an element of protection against an irreversible error, executing an innocent person. The governor should not allow the machinery of capital punishment to grind further without moving ahead on this front.

This is the third in a set of editorials on why Ohio should suspend its death penalty.




Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button














Most Commented Stories