Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Police accuse bank robbery suspect of gobbling up note (with dashcam video)
Victim of beating in Kent last week is declared dead at Akron hospital
Dad accused of forcing son into field, killing him
Can DNA tests free ex-Akron captain?
Man found dead in North Akron home is identified
Browns' roster nearly devoid of consistent players
Does it work? Test team returns to try out new products advertised on television
Coventry man killed in crash at I-77 ramp
Blogs:
Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Night Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Browns vs. Lions live …
Akron Zips:
Akron trounces Howard to reach .500
Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster
Cleveland Browns:
Robiskie, Harrison inactive
Kent State Sports:
Kent State blown out in second half, loses to Temple 47-13
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad
Varsity Letters:
Four area football teams play tonight
All Da King's Men:
The Sunday Sanity Challenge
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Will Health Care Reform Pass?
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (69) The Brookings Institute Study on "Bending the Curve" – Four General Strategies
See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic
Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Silverdome Potentially SOLD!
Ohio Travels with Betty:
George is looking for a Thanksgiving buffet in Akron.
Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall
HRLite House:
A Random Rant on Testing
Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go
In Congress, Democrats lack votes to drive changes in domestic spending. The casualties are programs such as children's health insurance
Published on Tuesday, Dec 18, 2007
This weekend, the House Democrats bowed to the cruel reality. In an effort to move on budgets for federal departments before the Christmas break, they fashioned an omnibus bill for domestic spending that largely stays within Bush's spending limits.
If the White House appears to have won that arm-wrestling contest (it said it is encouraged by some of the concessions), the confrontation has also underscored the task the Democrats face, with their slim majorities, to shift spending to crucial programs that would be shortchanged by a president lately touting fiscal responsibility. No effort this year has illustrated this contest of priorities than the failed attempt to reauthorize the State Children's Health Insurance Program. Last week, Bush rejected for the second time Congress' bid to spend an additional $35 million over five years to cover the health of approximately 10 million poor children.
Among other objections, the president assailed the increased spending (from a proposed increase in taxes on tobacco products). His own budget offered a meager $5 billion more to SCHIP for five years. That amount would be inadequate even to sustain the current enrollment. Missing on the president's radar was that more working households are losing health coverage as a result of high premiums or spending higher percentages of the family income on health care.
It was disturbing that the White House chose to wage an ideological battle against ''socialized medicine'' using the popular and successful children's health-care program as a tool. More discouraging yet were the misleading claims (for instance, that the Democrats included middle-class families with incomes around $80,000 a year) that Bush deployed.
The Senate approved the initial SCHIP bill with bipartisan margins wide enough to override a veto threat. In the House, where the approval margin was narrower, there weren't enough votes to counter Bush when he did veto the bill in October.
To their credit, advocates of SCHIP continued to tweak the proposals to address Bush's major concerns. Among other changes, the revised bill capped eligibility for SCHIP at 300 percent (about $60,000 for a family of four) of the federal poverty level. It strengthened incentives to enroll first the poorest children eligible for Medicaid. It speeded up the time to remove childless adults from the program.
If the hope was that the changes would persuade Bush to ensure more low-income children received the benefit of good health care, it did not work out. He still claimed the cost was unacceptably high, even as uninsurance among children is rising again.
Congressional Democrats have conceded their helplessness against veto threats. They should hold out for smarter spending priorities.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
