Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Family found dead in Ohio home
Man gets 3 years in prison for having sex with horse
Robbers order bar patrons to empty pockets
Sex-toy study at Duke University raises some eyebrows
Akron man turns himself in after authorities turn up heat
Man appears alive at own funeral
Take comfort in knowing Browns could be bigger losers
Blogs:
Pets:
Not 101 Dalmations…but close!
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
For your perusal
Akron Zips:
The morning after
Tribe Matters:
Tribe makes roster moves
Cleveland Browns:
Lewis doesn't like boycott
Kent State Sports:
Kent State falls to Akron, 20-28
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Knicks
Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.
Varsity Letters:
Wrestling, bowling teams prepare for season
All Da King's Men:
If It Looks Like Islamic Terrorism…
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Dems Message To Women: Don't Enjoy The Sex
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (62) The Stupak Amendment
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Perfect Weather for an Autumn Drive
Let's Talk Real Estate:
RUMORS: Downtown Restaurant Explosion
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record
The state's unemployment compensation fund is in sorry shape, and that jeopardizes a safety net benefiting all Ohioans
Published on Monday, Jan 07, 2008
If a deep enough recession strikes? The fund could go broke by the end of the year.
Clearly, lawmakers must address the problem. They will get help. Gov. Ted Strickland has asked the Urban Institute, a highly respected think tank in Washington, D.C., to examine the fund and make proposals for shoring up its structure and finances. Chances are the institute will discover what has been plain for years: The state of the struggling Ohio economy amounts to a heavy burden on the fund. In addition to the job losses has been the decline in employers, from 233,000 in 2000 to 227,000 today.
The advisory council, including business and labor leaders, proposed that employers pay unemployment taxes on the first $9,500 that each worker is paid, an increase of $500 over the current taxable amount. Worth emphasis is that since the 1990s, Ohio employers have paid less than the national average in unemployment taxes. More, 17 states index the taxable wage to inflation.
As part of its package, the advisory commission included a freeze on benefit levels. That step reflected a particular challenge. If the Ohio system faces a financial squeeze, it is not because the benefits are too expansive. The truth is, Ohio restricts eligibility more than most states.
Policy Matters Ohio, a Cleveland think tank, recently reported that the state is one of only three in which an employee earning minimum wage and working 29 hours a week would not qualify for jobless benefits. Ohio is part of a similar trio that denies unemployment compensation to employees working all year earning $9 an hour for 20 hours per week. The state is one of six in which an employee working 20 hours a week for a year would not qualify.
As the Policy Matters analysis points out, each state sets its own criteria for eligibility. In Ohio, a worker must earn on average at least $206 a week for at least 20 weeks to receive unemployment compensation. That translates into 30 percent of jobless Ohioans receiving benefits, the 40th lowest percentage among the states.
Without question, Ohio must take the necessary steps to repair the financial condition of its unemployment compensation trust fund. If it does not, the federal government eventually will mandate action.
In addressing the problem, the governor and legislators must keep in mind the first purpose — to cushion the fall of the unfortunate (and often their families), to prevent their slide into a poverty hard to escape. This program serves all of us, jobless benefits having a helpful multiplier effect for the economy. The positive result is likely to expand when state leaders set generous enough eligibility standards to make a difference in difficult lives.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
