Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Akron police investigate teen mob attack on family
Man found hanging at playground in Stow
Family is proud of late son's gift
Man shot in back near Akron park
Varejao's $50 million deal isn't really $50 million
Woman, 75, charged with beating fawn to death
Akron woman found dead at Brimfield Township store
Robbery suspect's body left at Akron hospital
Blogs:
Pets:
Sly children fool exercise study by using dogs
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Dwayne Wade says no to Cleveland
Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Kent State
Browns Bulletin:
Quick thought on Browns rookies
Tribe Matters:
Now is no time to quit
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana
Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Andy’s Signed According to ESPN
All Da King's Men:
Baby Got Barack !
Blog of Mass Destruction:
As California Goes?
Akron Law Café:
Why do public officials violate Ohio Ethics Laws?
Varsity Letters:
Report: Ontko selects Wisconsin
See Jane Style:
Oh Baby!
Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Closings….Not the Good Kind!
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Margy inquires-when is a Taste of Hudson?
Sound Check:
LeVert II live performance Saturday night — "Dedication" album due July 13,
HRLite House:
DDI One of Best Places to Work
Akron Gamer:
Video game sales drop in May
The state's unemployment compensation fund is in sorry shape, and that jeopardizes a safety net benefiting all Ohioans
Published on Monday, Jan 07, 2008
If a deep enough recession strikes? The fund could go broke by the end of the year.
Clearly, lawmakers must address the problem. They will get help. Gov. Ted Strickland has asked the Urban Institute, a highly respected think tank in Washington, D.C., to examine the fund and make proposals for shoring up its structure and finances. Chances are the institute will discover what has been plain for years: The state of the struggling Ohio economy amounts to a heavy burden on the fund. In addition to the job losses has been the decline in employers, from 233,000 in 2000 to 227,000 today.
The advisory council, including business and labor leaders, proposed that employers pay unemployment taxes on the first $9,500 that each worker is paid, an increase of $500 over the current taxable amount. Worth emphasis is that since the 1990s, Ohio employers have paid less than the national average in unemployment taxes. More, 17 states index the taxable wage to inflation.
As part of its package, the advisory commission included a freeze on benefit levels. That step reflected a particular challenge. If the Ohio system faces a financial squeeze, it is not because the benefits are too expansive. The truth is, Ohio restricts eligibility more than most states.
Policy Matters Ohio, a Cleveland think tank, recently reported that the state is one of only three in which an employee earning minimum wage and working 29 hours a week would not qualify for jobless benefits. Ohio is part of a similar trio that denies unemployment compensation to employees working all year earning $9 an hour for 20 hours per week. The state is one of six in which an employee working 20 hours a week for a year would not qualify.
As the Policy Matters analysis points out, each state sets its own criteria for eligibility. In Ohio, a worker must earn on average at least $206 a week for at least 20 weeks to receive unemployment compensation. That translates into 30 percent of jobless Ohioans receiving benefits, the 40th lowest percentage among the states.
Without question, Ohio must take the necessary steps to repair the financial condition of its unemployment compensation trust fund. If it does not, the federal government eventually will mandate action.
In addressing the problem, the governor and legislators must keep in mind the first purpose — to cushion the fall of the unfortunate (and often their families), to prevent their slide into a poverty hard to escape. This program serves all of us, jobless benefits having a helpful multiplier effect for the economy. The positive result is likely to expand when state leaders set generous enough eligibility standards to make a difference in difficult lives.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
