Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Police accuse bank robbery suspect of gobbling up note (with dashcam video)
Victim of beating in Kent last week is declared dead at Akron hospital
Akron man killed in crash on his street
Can DNA tests free ex-Akron captain?
Browns find another way to lose
Dad accused of forcing son into field, killing him
Man found dead in North Akron home is identified
Blogs:
Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens
The Heldenfiles:
Sunday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Browns sick after sick loss in Detroit
Akron Zips:
Zips advance to Sweet Sixteen
Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster
Cleveland Browns:
Post-game defensive quotes
Kent State Sports:
Kent State defeats Rochester College, 63-44
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad
Varsity Letters:
Four area football teams play tonight
All Da King's Men:
The Sunday Sanity Challenge
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Will Health Care Reform Pass?
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (70) Savings in Medicare Advantage
See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic
Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Faye Dunaway to be Evicted?
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Monique asks how to get tickets for the Polar Express.
Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – You are All Wrong About Jobs, or the Lack of Jobs, Being the Reason People Do Not Live in NEO
Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go
They've been talking about electricity restructuring at the Statehouse. Now the moment has arrived to craft the necessary compromise
Published on Tuesday, Feb 12, 2008
Truth be told, the timetable was most ambitious in view of the complexity of the issue and the muscle of the many interested parties. The Ohio House performed a favor by holding extensive hearings the past two months, witnesses clashing in front of lawmakers, adding to the legislature's collective understanding. The Senate did not achieve such thoroughness in overwhelmingly approving legislation in November.
When will the House pass its own version of a restructuring plan? A week ago, Speaker Jon Husted described the bill as ''very close to being ready.'' That was heartening to hear. March is approaching, and now the legislature must act.
The speaker described the roadblock to passage. It involves defining when a functioning market exists.
When lawmakers approved electricity deregulation in 1999, they altered dramatically the landscape for power companies. If the experiment has failed in many respects, the state cannot just return to the old regulatory model. It must craft an effective ''hybrid,'' leaving utilities with the option of choosing a more regulated regimen or going to the marketplace.
The governor and state senators insist they have crafted an effective hybrid. The trouble is, they rely almost exclusively on the Public Utilities Commission to define when an effective market exists. The speaker rightly argues that power companies deserve something more concrete in the form of legislation that establishes clear criteria for a market, the standards, in other words, that they must meet.
What are the standards? That is the argument in play at the Statehouse, countless lobbyists, consultants and others looking to have their say. They've talked long enough. The speaker has made a most persuasive case for adding benchmarks and greater enforcement to the pursuit of a state portfolio of 25 percent renewable and advanced energy by 2025. Get the market defined, and the state can move forward.
The task is challenging, no doubt. It is not insurmountable. If the sheer volume of trades in the wholesale market is not sufficient evidence of a robust market, other criteria are available, including the availability of supply, the barriers to entry and the number of interested suppliers. Test the climate by issuing requests for proposals, and if too few arrive, then declare the market lacking. Protect against soaring price increases in that way.
Adversaries in this debate long have been talking past one another, each preferring the market definition of its narrow choosing. Yet listen carefully, and you detect much room for agreement. They must simply decide to bridge differences. That should be now in the House bill, allowing Ohio to put behind this discussion, having achieved the proper balance of market flexibility and regulatory stability.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
