Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Akron police investigate teen mob attack on family
Woman, 75, charged with beating fawn to death
Akron woman found dead at Brimfield Township store
Man shot in back near Akron park
Man shot outside his Akron home during robbery attempt
Man admits repeatedly biting 2-year-old
Tragic day puts man on path to be Pinnacle owner
Blogs:
Pets:
Dogs' Bark: Not fair! Study shows pups get jealous
The Heldenfiles:
Who Will Get the Michael Media Treatment Next?
Patrick McManamon:
More on Varejao
Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Kent State
Browns Bulletin:
Quick thought on Browns rookies
Tribe Matters:
Wedge challenges relievers
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana
Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Andy’s Signed According to ESPN
All Da King's Men:
Does Medicare Have Lower Administrative Costs ?
Blog of Mass Destruction:
CIA Did Mislead Congress
Akron Law Café:
Breaking Story: CIA Lied to Congress about Secret Program
Varsity Letters:
East basketball update
See Jane Style:
Oh Baby!
Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Closings….Not the Good Kind!
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Margy inquires-when is a Taste of Hudson?
Sound Check:
LeVert II live performance Saturday night — "Dedication" album due July 13,
HRLite House:
DDI One of Best Places to Work
Akron Gamer:
First 24 'Guitar Hero 5' songs announced
They've been talking about electricity restructuring at the Statehouse. Now the moment has arrived to craft the necessary compromise
Published on Tuesday, Feb 12, 2008
Truth be told, the timetable was most ambitious in view of the complexity of the issue and the muscle of the many interested parties. The Ohio House performed a favor by holding extensive hearings the past two months, witnesses clashing in front of lawmakers, adding to the legislature's collective understanding. The Senate did not achieve such thoroughness in overwhelmingly approving legislation in November.
When will the House pass its own version of a restructuring plan? A week ago, Speaker Jon Husted described the bill as ''very close to being ready.'' That was heartening to hear. March is approaching, and now the legislature must act.
The speaker described the roadblock to passage. It involves defining when a functioning market exists.
When lawmakers approved electricity deregulation in 1999, they altered dramatically the landscape for power companies. If the experiment has failed in many respects, the state cannot just return to the old regulatory model. It must craft an effective ''hybrid,'' leaving utilities with the option of choosing a more regulated regimen or going to the marketplace.
The governor and state senators insist they have crafted an effective hybrid. The trouble is, they rely almost exclusively on the Public Utilities Commission to define when an effective market exists. The speaker rightly argues that power companies deserve something more concrete in the form of legislation that establishes clear criteria for a market, the standards, in other words, that they must meet.
What are the standards? That is the argument in play at the Statehouse, countless lobbyists, consultants and others looking to have their say. They've talked long enough. The speaker has made a most persuasive case for adding benchmarks and greater enforcement to the pursuit of a state portfolio of 25 percent renewable and advanced energy by 2025. Get the market defined, and the state can move forward.
The task is challenging, no doubt. It is not insurmountable. If the sheer volume of trades in the wholesale market is not sufficient evidence of a robust market, other criteria are available, including the availability of supply, the barriers to entry and the number of interested suppliers. Test the climate by issuing requests for proposals, and if too few arrive, then declare the market lacking. Protect against soaring price increases in that way.
Adversaries in this debate long have been talking past one another, each preferring the market definition of its narrow choosing. Yet listen carefully, and you detect much room for agreement. They must simply decide to bridge differences. That should be now in the House bill, allowing Ohio to put behind this discussion, having achieved the proper balance of market flexibility and regulatory stability.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
