Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Fourth of July Events; fireworks, neighborhood parades
Tragic accident cause of death of BMX biker
Indians' Borowski on borrowed time
Governor will use cornhole to fund campaign
Police seek Akron man in deadly shooting
Mail Pouch signs are fading fast
Blogs:
Akron Law Café:
Exxon Saved From the Rocks: The Supreme Court Limits Punitive Damages
The Heldenfiles:
Happy Day
Balanced Ledger:
Olympics, interested?
Patrick McManamon:
Yellowstone, C.C. Sabathia, Brian Windhorst and … yes … Yellowstone
Browns Bulletin:
ESPN's Browns love-in chugs along
Cleveland Browns:
Bentley leaves minicamp
Cleveland Indians:
Spanked on Independence Day
Akron Aeros:
All Stars, Roster Moves and More!
Akron Zips:
Contemplating fall camp
Varsity Letters:
CVCA junior soccer stars Speas & Mason to play at UA
Kent State Sports:
Jarvis on Maxwell watch list
Ohio Politics:
2008 = 1972? 1976? 1992? 2000? 2004?
All Da King's Men:
Words For Independence Day
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Dependence Day
Akrocentric:
Charles Taormina discusses "Acceptance of Individual Authors," self-publishing resources
Akron Gamer:
Harmonix keeps on Rock'n
BokBluster:
Patriot Games
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Is there an American Girl store in Ohio?
Olympic Dreams - Running:
Back to Phase One
Sound Check:
Tim McGraw wows and woos Blossom
Tia's Trends:
Saks Saleswoman Accused of Stealing $1 Million
They've been talking about electricity restructuring at the Statehouse. Now the moment has arrived to craft the necessary compromise
Published on Tuesday, Feb 12, 2008
Truth be told, the timetable was most ambitious in view of the complexity of the issue and the muscle of the many interested parties. The Ohio House performed a favor by holding extensive hearings the past two months, witnesses clashing in front of lawmakers, adding to the legislature's collective understanding. The Senate did not achieve such thoroughness in overwhelmingly approving legislation in November.
When will the House pass its own version of a restructuring plan? A week ago, Speaker Jon Husted described the bill as ''very close to being ready.'' That was heartening to hear. March is approaching, and now the legislature must act.
The speaker described the roadblock to passage. It involves defining when a functioning market exists.
When lawmakers approved electricity deregulation in 1999, they altered dramatically the landscape for power companies. If the experiment has failed in many respects, the state cannot just return to the old regulatory model. It must craft an effective ''hybrid,'' leaving utilities with the option of choosing a more regulated regimen or going to the marketplace.
The governor and state senators insist they have crafted an effective hybrid. The trouble is, they rely almost exclusively on the Public Utilities Commission to define when an effective market exists. The speaker rightly argues that power companies deserve something more concrete in the form of legislation that establishes clear criteria for a market, the standards, in other words, that they must meet.
What are the standards? That is the argument in play at the Statehouse, countless lobbyists, consultants and others looking to have their say. They've talked long enough. The speaker has made a most persuasive case for adding benchmarks and greater enforcement to the pursuit of a state portfolio of 25 percent renewable and advanced energy by 2025. Get the market defined, and the state can move forward.
The task is challenging, no doubt. It is not insurmountable. If the sheer volume of trades in the wholesale market is not sufficient evidence of a robust market, other criteria are available, including the availability of supply, the barriers to entry and the number of interested suppliers. Test the climate by issuing requests for proposals, and if too few arrive, then declare the market lacking. Protect against soaring price increases in that way.
Adversaries in this debate long have been talking past one another, each preferring the market definition of its narrow choosing. Yet listen carefully, and you detect much room for agreement. They must simply decide to bridge differences. That should be now in the House bill, allowing Ohio to put behind this discussion, having achieved the proper balance of market flexibility and regulatory stability.
Get the full article here.

