Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Summit teams up with Rescue Waggin' to save dogs

The Heldenfiles:
Songs for an American Day

Patrick McManamon:
For your Saturday entertainment …

Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Northern Illinois

Browns Bulletin:
Single-game ticket sales begin July 11

Tribe Matters:
Laffey making it tough on self

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana

Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Updated: Free Agency: Another Gone - Apparently

All Da King's Men:
IPCC Already Wrong About Global Warming

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Wow….Sarah Palin Resigns Governorship

Akron Law Café:
Abraham Lincoln and the Fourth of July

Varsity Letters:
Highland senior receives honor

See Jane Style:
Picnic Wear

Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Hate Crime in Fort Worth Texas: "That F***t had it Coming"

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Linda asks-where is the Ohio Chautauqua?

Sound Check:
Rundgren fans rejoice!: Second night of AWATS at The Civic added

HRLite House:
Morscruethal Behaviors or Just Lip Service?

Akron Gamer:
Hot link: Best of Nintendo at E3

Mercury falling

A federal appeals court recognizes a dangerous pollutant

The Ohio Environmental Council captured well the severe toxicity of mercury, noting in a press release last week that just ''one-seventieth of a teaspoon of mercury is needed to contaminate a 25-acre lake to the point where fish are unsafe to eat.'' No wonder the Bush White House touted in 2005 the issuing of federal regulations aimed at reducing mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants. The country would benefit significantly.

Unfortunately, the Bush team carved a gaping loophole in the rule. Yes, toxic pollution would be curbed. The emissions wouldn't be reduced enough to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act, the priority the law places on the quality of public health. Thus, a week ago, a panel of federal appeals court judges (including a Bush the younger appointee) unanimously struck down the EPA regulations. They concluded that the feds ignored their legal obligation to require the strictest controls, jabbing the agency for applying ''the logic of the Queen of Hearts,'' substituting its own wishes for the ''plain text.''

The dangerous loophole stemmed from a cap-and-trade system for curbing emissions. If overall mercury pollution would be reduced 70 percent by 2018, the purchase of allowances would translate into certain power plants escaping sufficient controls. Those people in the vicinity of such a plant wouldn't see the benefits required by the law. In other words, their health would be unduly at risk.

The cap-and-trade system has proved effective in lowering emissions of sulfur dioxide (the culprit in acid rain). The system would serve well in reducing greenhouse gases that drive global warming. Mercury is simply too toxic to allow for these ''hot spots,'' where the emissions escape necessary regulation.

What next? The hope is, the litigation will cease, and the feds will return to the plan devised by the Clinton White House in 2000, requiring tighter and, yes, more expensive controls, reducing mercury emissions 90 percent. The Clinton plan had the distinct legal advantage of holding to the law, putting public health above all.

The Ohio Environmental Council captured well the severe toxicity of mercury, noting in a press release last week that just ''one-seventieth of a teaspoon of mercury is needed to contaminate a 25-acre lake to the point where fish are unsafe to eat.'' No wonder the Bush White House touted in 2005 the issuing of federal regulations aimed at reducing mercury emissions from coal-fired power plants. The country would benefit significantly.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories