Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Blogs:
Pets:
Summit teams up with Rescue Waggin' to save dogs
The Heldenfiles:
Songs for an American Day
Patrick McManamon:
For your Saturday entertainment …
Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Northern Illinois
Browns Bulletin:
Single-game ticket sales begin July 11
Tribe Matters:
Laffey making it tough on self
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana
Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Updated: Free Agency: Another Gone - Apparently
All Da King's Men:
IPCC Already Wrong About Global Warming
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Wow….Sarah Palin Resigns Governorship
Akron Law Café:
Abraham Lincoln and the Fourth of July
Varsity Letters:
Highland senior receives honor
See Jane Style:
Picnic Wear
Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Hate Crime in Fort Worth Texas: "That F***t had it Coming"
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Linda asks-where is the Ohio Chautauqua?
Sound Check:
Rundgren fans rejoice!: Second night of AWATS at The Civic added
HRLite House:
Morscruethal Behaviors or Just Lip Service?
Akron Gamer:
Hot link: Best of Nintendo at E3
A federal appeals court recognizes a dangerous pollutant
Published on Friday, Feb 15, 2008
Unfortunately, the Bush team carved a gaping loophole in the rule. Yes, toxic pollution would be curbed. The emissions wouldn't be reduced enough to meet the requirements of the Clean Air Act, the priority the law places on the quality of public health. Thus, a week ago, a panel of federal appeals court judges (including a Bush the younger appointee) unanimously struck down the EPA regulations. They concluded that the feds ignored their legal obligation to require the strictest controls, jabbing the agency for applying ''the logic of the Queen of Hearts,'' substituting its own wishes for the ''plain text.''
The dangerous loophole stemmed from a cap-and-trade system for curbing emissions. If overall mercury pollution would be reduced 70 percent by 2018, the purchase of allowances would translate into certain power plants escaping sufficient controls. Those people in the vicinity of such a plant wouldn't see the benefits required by the law. In other words, their health would be unduly at risk.
The cap-and-trade system has proved effective in lowering emissions of sulfur dioxide (the culprit in acid rain). The system would serve well in reducing greenhouse gases that drive global warming. Mercury is simply too toxic to allow for these ''hot spots,'' where the emissions escape necessary regulation.
What next? The hope is, the litigation will cease, and the feds will return to the plan devised by the Clinton White House in 2000, requiring tighter and, yes, more expensive controls, reducing mercury emissions 90 percent. The Clinton plan had the distinct legal advantage of holding to the law, putting public health above all.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
