Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Police accuse bank robbery suspect of gobbling up note (with dashcam video)
Victim of beating in Kent last week is declared dead at Akron hospital
Dad accused of forcing son into field, killing him
Man found dead in North Akron home is identified
Can DNA tests free ex-Akron captain?
Browns' roster nearly devoid of consistent players
Coventry man killed in crash at I-77 ramp
College student mistaken for deer, shot to death
Blogs:
Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Night Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Browns vs. Lions live …
Akron Zips:
Hitchens leads Zips in second-half comeback
Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster
Cleveland Browns:
Robiskie, Harrison inactive
Kent State Sports:
Kent State blown out in second half, loses to Temple 47-13
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad
Varsity Letters:
Four area football teams play tonight
All Da King's Men:
The Sunday Sanity Challenge
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Will Health Care Reform Pass?
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (69) The Brookings Institute Study on "Bending the Curve" – Four General Strategies
See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic
Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Silverdome Potentially SOLD!
Ohio Travels with Betty:
George is looking for a Thanksgiving buffet in Akron.
Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall
HRLite House:
A Random Rant on Testing
Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go
Where does the governor stand on electricity restructuring?
Published on Tuesday, Feb 26, 2008
Strickland proposed his own plan last year, which the Senate largely accepted by a unanimous vote, much to the delight of larger industrial customers. Now the House is working through the matter, looking, frankly, for a better balance. If the governor is right that the House must act soon, it also is true that his office must do some hard thinking.
What is the governor's position, anyway? He opened this debate arguing correctly that the state required a ''hybrid,'' a mix of market and regulatory elements, all reflecting the hard reality that Ohio launched deregulation nine years ago and cannot put the genie back into the bottle. FirstEnergy of Akron substantially adapted its company to the new rules.
Of late, Strickland has been sounding more like an old-time regulator. He portrays himself in a ''Herculean battle'' against dark titans. He poses as determined to protect consumers against gouging and other nefarious acts. (Might the governor recall that electricity prices soared under traditional regulation?) He warns that powerful utilities want the final word on pricing, as opposed to an independent body (the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio).
Look at what FirstEnergy actually proposed last fall. The company put forward a process in which each utility would submit a rate plan. Negotiations would follow with the PUCO. If the talks failed to produce an agreed rate, a competitive bidding process would follow to establish a market price. If the PUCO ruled that a competitive market did not exist, its price would take effect for a year, and the process would begin again. In short, the PUCO would have the authority to say no.
What the utilities want is a more precise definition of when a market exists. That has been the focus of the House effort. The governor and the other parties should be able to craft an effective compromise.
Unfortunately, the governor's office appears more inclined to posture, claiming last week that a steelmaker balked at locating in Ohio because of uncertainty about electricity rates. The truth is, utilities usually provide industrial customers with favorable prices. More, if the uncertainty is harming the state, then face honestly what a true ''hybrid'' requires.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
