Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Family found dead in Ohio home
Man gets 3 years in prison for having sex with horse
Robbers order bar patrons to empty pockets
Sex-toy study at Duke University raises some eyebrows
Akron man turns himself in after authorities turn up heat
Man appears alive at own funeral
Take comfort in knowing Browns could be bigger losers
Blogs:
Pets:
Not 101 Dalmations…but close!
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
For your perusal
Akron Zips:
The morning after
Tribe Matters:
Tribe makes roster moves
Cleveland Browns:
Lewis doesn't like boycott
Kent State Sports:
Kent State falls to Akron, 20-28
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Knicks
Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.
Varsity Letters:
Wrestling, bowling teams prepare for season
All Da King's Men:
If It Looks Like Islamic Terrorism…
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Dems Message To Women: Don't Enjoy The Sex
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (62) The Stupak Amendment
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Perfect Weather for an Autumn Drive
Let's Talk Real Estate:
RUMORS: Downtown Restaurant Explosion
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record
Where does the governor stand on electricity restructuring?
Published on Tuesday, Feb 26, 2008
Strickland proposed his own plan last year, which the Senate largely accepted by a unanimous vote, much to the delight of larger industrial customers. Now the House is working through the matter, looking, frankly, for a better balance. If the governor is right that the House must act soon, it also is true that his office must do some hard thinking.
What is the governor's position, anyway? He opened this debate arguing correctly that the state required a ''hybrid,'' a mix of market and regulatory elements, all reflecting the hard reality that Ohio launched deregulation nine years ago and cannot put the genie back into the bottle. FirstEnergy of Akron substantially adapted its company to the new rules.
Of late, Strickland has been sounding more like an old-time regulator. He portrays himself in a ''Herculean battle'' against dark titans. He poses as determined to protect consumers against gouging and other nefarious acts. (Might the governor recall that electricity prices soared under traditional regulation?) He warns that powerful utilities want the final word on pricing, as opposed to an independent body (the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio).
Look at what FirstEnergy actually proposed last fall. The company put forward a process in which each utility would submit a rate plan. Negotiations would follow with the PUCO. If the talks failed to produce an agreed rate, a competitive bidding process would follow to establish a market price. If the PUCO ruled that a competitive market did not exist, its price would take effect for a year, and the process would begin again. In short, the PUCO would have the authority to say no.
What the utilities want is a more precise definition of when a market exists. That has been the focus of the House effort. The governor and the other parties should be able to craft an effective compromise.
Unfortunately, the governor's office appears more inclined to posture, claiming last week that a steelmaker balked at locating in Ohio because of uncertainty about electricity rates. The truth is, utilities usually provide industrial customers with favorable prices. More, if the uncertainty is harming the state, then face honestly what a true ''hybrid'' requires.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
