Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Akrocentric:
Raw Umber event; Charles Taormina discusses our culture's fledgling publishing renaissance

Akron Aeros:
More rest than needed

Akron Zips:
Taylor advances on ‘Dancing with the Stars’

All Da King's Men:
Irrational On Oil

Balanced Ledger:
Spring football

Blog of Mass Destruction:
"Solidarity"

BokBluster:
Dann Down

Browns Bulletin:
Wright out, Perry in

Cleveland Browns:
Wright faces second marijuana charge

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Reality starting to bite

Kent State Sports:
Third scholarship still looking for a taker

Ohio Politics:
Edwards Endorses

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Is the Lincoln Highway the same as the National Road?

Olympic Dreams - Running:
Oregon Twilight

Patrick McManamon:
Game 5 goes to Boston, and the cheerleaders check in …

Sound Check:
American Idol Vodcast

Tia's Trends:
ICSC Convention - Adventures in Retail!!!

The Heldenfiles:
Lovin' the Feel of the Wheel

The Sports Blitz:
Cleveland Browns - They Love Them! They Really, Really Love Them!

Varsity Letters:
North, Firestone win Auten track and field titles

Lines of compromise

The Ohio House has a better idea for redistricting

As Ohio's primary approached, renewed concerns about making sure every vote counts were triggered by a new study of electronic voting commissioned by Jennifer Brunner, the secretary of state, and released late last year. By November, all touch-screen voting machines will be gone. Instead, voters will get paper ballots.

As this huge shift, affecting 57 counties and costing an estimated $31 million, moved ahead, Jon Husted, the House speaker, renewed another plan to achieve the same goal. Far less technical and much less costly, Husted's idea is to change the way legislative and congressional districts are redrawn.

Rather than lopsided districts favoring one party over another, the speaker has in mind boundaries that promote robust competition between the parties. Husted is right: Gerrymandered districts diminish the value of an individual's vote.

As it is, legislative districts are redrawn after each census by a special five-member board made up of the governor, auditor, secretary of state and a legislator from each party. Congressional districts are redrawn by the legislature.

Under a resolution introduced by Larry Wolpert, a Hilliard Republican, a bipartisan, seven-member commission would adjust legislative and congressional lines. Four members would come from the legislature, two from each party. The four would select three more members. For the first time, fostering political competition would be a factor. All that would take a constitutional amendment; Wolpert's resolution would place one on the November ballot.

Unfortunately, sensing an upturn in their party's fortunes, Democrats have been increasingly partisan in their objections. Rep. Chris Redfern, a Catawba Island Democrat who chairs the Ohio Democratic Party, says he is waiting for a legitimate request for cooperation. In truth, Republicans worked with members of a Democrat-leaning coalition to develop the proposed amendment. The coalition, Reform Ohio Now, failed in a 2005 effort to win voter approval of a similar measure.

In the end, more competitive districts would encourage a politics of the center, lawmakers driven to consider all viewpoints and find the common ground necessary to move Ohio forward on many fronts.

As Ohio's primary approached, renewed concerns about making sure every vote counts were triggered by a new study of electronic voting commissioned by Jennifer Brunner, the secretary of state, and released late last year. By November, all touch-screen voting machines will be gone. Instead, voters will get paper ballots.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button