Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Zeke, the basketball playing dog

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
For your Saturday entertainment …

Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Kent State

Browns Bulletin:
Quick thought on Browns rookies

Tribe Matters:
7-11-09 Morning Highlights

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana

Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Andy’s Signed According to ESPN

All Da King's Men:
Baby Got Barack !

Blog of Mass Destruction:
The Rogue Bush White House

Akron Law Café:
New Wiretapping Revelations from Inspector General

Varsity Letters:
Report: Ontko selects Wisconsin

See Jane Style:
Oh Baby!

Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Closings….Not the Good Kind!

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Margy inquires-when is a Taste of Hudson?

Sound Check:
LeVert II live performance Saturday night — "Dedication" album due July 13,

HRLite House:
DDI One of Best Places to Work

Akron Gamer:
Video game sales drop in May

Votes of confidence

The primary election went smoothly in Ohio. Thanks, in part, to electronic touch-screen machines

Thankfully, the excitement surrounding the primary election in Ohio reflected enthusiasm for the candidates, expressed through a large voter turnout, and not malfunctioning equipment. With minor exceptions (even in Cuyahoga County), voting went smoothly. The question now is whether to move forward with Jennifer Brunner's plan to replace all touch-screen voting machines in the state with optically scanned paper ballots in time for the November general election.

Ohio's secretary of state has not mandated the change. She is looking for federal and state money to pay for the switch, affecting 53 counties still using touch-screens. Cost estimates have soared to $64 million, more than double original estimates.

What Tuesday's voting confirmed is that the massive switch is not necessary.

Prior to the primary, Brunner directed local officials to make paper ballots available as backups for touch-screen voting. Afterward, she contended the directive saved the day in several counties. She noted paper ballots enabled polls in Lucas County to keep going when programming errors caused problems. In Darke and Knox counties, paper ballots eased troubles created by power outages and dead batteries.

Those types of problems call for better training and procedures, not junking electronic voting.

More telling is that voters in touch-screen counties across the state overwhelmingly bypassed the option of choosing a paper ballot. In Portage County, several hundred voters out of 45,000 chose to fill in ovals with a black pen. In Franklin County, where touch-screen voting predates the 2000 presidential vote in Florida that generated a wave of change across the country, a mere 800 or so out of more than 200,000 voters chose paper ballots.

Despite worries about polling places lacking a sufficient number of paper ballots, the secretary of state's office found shortages only in counties already using optical scanners. Concerns surfaced in Cuyahoga County (using optical scan machines for the first time) about the security in transporting boxes of paper ballots downtown for an official tally.

In their way, Ohio voters gave a vote of confidence in the primary election to the continued use of touch-screen technology. The theoretical possibilities of deliberate tampering raised by Brunner's office gave way to the practical realities experienced in daily life, in the use of computers for banking, paying bills, trading stocks. Touch-screen voting is convenient. Most important, the kind of voter mistakes that can void ballots can be corrected in an instant.

Even if the $64 million can be found, the state should resist paying for solutions to problems that do not exist. There are plenty of real election needs to be met between now and November.

Thankfully, the excitement surrounding the primary election in Ohio reflected enthusiasm for the candidates, expressed through a large voter turnout, and not malfunctioning equipment. With minor exceptions (even in Cuyahoga County), voting went smoothly. The question now is whether to move forward with Jennifer Brunner's plan to replace all touch-screen voting machines in the state with optically scanned paper ballots in time for the November general election.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories