Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
It Takes All Kinds

The Heldenfiles:
Tuesday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
An interesting thought from a reader

Akron Zips:
Akron vs. Mount Union — Liveblog

Tribe Matters:
Indians announce spring dates

Cleveland Browns:
Mangini doesn't name a quarterback

Kent State Sports:
Flashes interested in another Cincinnati player

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Shaq: It’s All About Winning Championships

Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes Roll 100-60 / Season Outlook

Varsity Letters:
Report: Walsh baseball player commits

All Da King's Men:
More On The Fort Hood Jihadist

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Simply Incapable of Telling The Truth

Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (63) Commonwealth Fund Report on Primary Care

See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler

Car Chase:
Clock Tender- Extending the Life of Collector Car Clocks

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Rumors: Akron Starbucks Closing

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.

Sound Check:
Aeromsith looking for new singer as Steven Tyler contemplates solo career

HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio

Akron Gamer:
Video: 'Modern Warfare 2' hits the streets

Votes of confidence

The primary election went smoothly in Ohio. Thanks, in part, to electronic touch-screen machines

Thankfully, the excitement surrounding the primary election in Ohio reflected enthusiasm for the candidates, expressed through a large voter turnout, and not malfunctioning equipment. With minor exceptions (even in Cuyahoga County), voting went smoothly. The question now is whether to move forward with Jennifer Brunner's plan to replace all touch-screen voting machines in the state with optically scanned paper ballots in time for the November general election.

Ohio's secretary of state has not mandated the change. She is looking for federal and state money to pay for the switch, affecting 53 counties still using touch-screens. Cost estimates have soared to $64 million, more than double original estimates.

What Tuesday's voting confirmed is that the massive switch is not necessary.

Prior to the primary, Brunner directed local officials to make paper ballots available as backups for touch-screen voting. Afterward, she contended the directive saved the day in several counties. She noted paper ballots enabled polls in Lucas County to keep going when programming errors caused problems. In Darke and Knox counties, paper ballots eased troubles created by power outages and dead batteries.

Those types of problems call for better training and procedures, not junking electronic voting.

More telling is that voters in touch-screen counties across the state overwhelmingly bypassed the option of choosing a paper ballot. In Portage County, several hundred voters out of 45,000 chose to fill in ovals with a black pen. In Franklin County, where touch-screen voting predates the 2000 presidential vote in Florida that generated a wave of change across the country, a mere 800 or so out of more than 200,000 voters chose paper ballots.

Despite worries about polling places lacking a sufficient number of paper ballots, the secretary of state's office found shortages only in counties already using optical scanners. Concerns surfaced in Cuyahoga County (using optical scan machines for the first time) about the security in transporting boxes of paper ballots downtown for an official tally.

In their way, Ohio voters gave a vote of confidence in the primary election to the continued use of touch-screen technology. The theoretical possibilities of deliberate tampering raised by Brunner's office gave way to the practical realities experienced in daily life, in the use of computers for banking, paying bills, trading stocks. Touch-screen voting is convenient. Most important, the kind of voter mistakes that can void ballots can be corrected in an instant.

Even if the $64 million can be found, the state should resist paying for solutions to problems that do not exist. There are plenty of real election needs to be met between now and November.

Thankfully, the excitement surrounding the primary election in Ohio reflected enthusiasm for the candidates, expressed through a large voter turnout, and not malfunctioning equipment. With minor exceptions (even in Cuyahoga County), voting went smoothly. The question now is whether to move forward with Jennifer Brunner's plan to replace all touch-screen voting machines in the state with optically scanned paper ballots in time for the November general election.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories