Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Akrocentric:
Will Akron Lose its Marbles? America's Oldest Still-Standing Toy Factory is in Akron

Akron Aeros:
Newsom saves ninth in as many tries as Aeros top Thunder

Akron Zips:
Zeke Marshall commits with Zips

All Da King's Men:
Obama's Shocking Ignorance

Balanced Ledger:
Spring football

Blog of Mass Destruction:
For Mothers Before They Were Against Mothers

BokBluster:
Willie Horton of Gitmo

Browns Bulletin:
Taped signals saga involved the Browns

Cleveland Browns:
McGinest's farewell tour

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Big Ben gets well, so do Cavs

Kent State Sports:
Sonnanstine wins four in April

Ohio Politics:
McCain Is In A Tough Spot

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Ron asks about bike events.

Olympic Dreams - Running:
Oregon Twilight

Patrick McManamon:
The key to game 4 isn't real complex …

Sound Check:
Black Keys play "secret" Myspace Show at Beachland

Tia's Trends:
Whitehall Jewelers CEO to Retire

The Heldenfiles:
Catching Up: The "CSI" Writing Crossover

The Sports Blitz:
Cleveland Browns - They Love Them! They Really, Really Love Them!

Varsity Letters:
North, Firestone win Auten track and field titles

Stifling dissent

Are touch-screen supporters in Brunner's sights?

The first statewide election on Jennifer Brunner's watch went smoothly, including voting in the 53 counties in Ohio that used electronic touch-screen machines. A tiny fraction of voters took advantage of the secretary of state's directive that paper ballots be provided as an alternative. Still, Brunner pushes for the elimination of touch screens by the fall election, substituting with paper ballots and optical scanners. Her pursuit remains an expensive and potentially disruptive proposition.

Has Brunner, a Democrat, squelched dissent on this issue? In at least two situations recently examined by the Columbus Dispatch, election officials who resisted Brunner's drive to eliminate touch-screen voting got the sack.

In Hardin County, James Crates was not reappointed last month. The Republican chairman of the county elections board, which uses touch screens, voted against Brunner's order to provide paper ballots. Also disturbing was the firing of Keith Cunningham, a Republican member of the Ohio Board of Voting Machine Examiners, who was fired in February after saying he would not support the elimination of touch-screen voting. Besides a decade as director of the Allen County Board of Elections, Cunningham has served as president of the Ohio Association of Election Officials and a member of the U.S. Elections Assistance Commission.

Matthew Damschroder, director of the Franklin County Board of Elections, also faced pressure from Brunner over his support of touch-screen voting, long in use in the Columbus area. As head of the statewide association of election officials, he clashed last year with Brunner. When the Franklin elections board reorganized last week, Damschroder was made deputy director.

After commissioning a report on electronic voting that dwelled on theoretical possibilities of tampering rather than any hard evidence from an Ohio election, Brunner would benefit from the practical advice of experienced election officials. Instead, she appears to have pushed them aside.

The first statewide election on Jennifer Brunner's watch went smoothly, including voting in the 53 counties in Ohio that used electronic touch-screen machines. A tiny fraction of voters took advantage of the secretary of state's directive that paper ballots be provided as an alternative. Still, Brunner pushes for the elimination of touch screens by the fall election, substituting with paper ballots and optical scanners. Her pursuit remains an expensive and potentially disruptive proposition.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button