Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Akrocentric:
Will Akron Lose its Marbles? America's Oldest Still-Standing Toy Factory is in Akron

Akron Aeros:
Newsom saves ninth in as many tries as Aeros top Thunder

Akron Zips:
Zeke Marshall commits with Zips

All Da King's Men:
Obama's Shocking Ignorance

Balanced Ledger:
Spring football

Blog of Mass Destruction:
For Mothers Before They Were Against Mothers

BokBluster:
Willie Horton of Gitmo

Browns Bulletin:
Taped signals saga involved the Browns

Cleveland Browns:
McGinest's farewell tour

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Big Ben gets well, so do Cavs

Kent State Sports:
Sonnanstine wins four in April

Ohio Politics:
McCain Is In A Tough Spot

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Ron asks about bike events.

Olympic Dreams - Running:
Oregon Twilight

Patrick McManamon:
The key to game 4 isn't real complex …

Sound Check:
Black Keys play "secret" Myspace Show at Beachland

Tia's Trends:
Whitehall Jewelers CEO to Retire

The Heldenfiles:
Catching Up: The "CSI" Writing Crossover

The Sports Blitz:
Cleveland Browns - They Love Them! They Really, Really Love Them!

Varsity Letters:
North, Firestone win Auten track and field titles

Pursuit of excellence

Eric Fingerhut didn't say merger. He didn't talk about a move. He did point the way to strengthening the region's universities

On Thursday, speaking at the Akron Roundtable, Eric Fingerhut unveiled much about the 10-year plan for higher education that he will present to the governor and legislature at the end of the month. The chancellor of the Ohio Board of Regents noted the ''resistance to change'' already encountered. He also made plain that a struggling Ohio must demand that its universities reorganize into ''centers of excellence,'' pursuing distinct missions designed to advance the state economy.

Fingerhut has shelved talk about the University of Akron and Cleveland State University operating more as one. He won't propose moving the Northeastern Ohio Universities College of Medicine to downtown Cleveland. Still, he rightly stressed that the four public universities in Northeast Ohio must end their squabbling and unproductive competition. They must differentiate and cooperate — or risk continuing a ''zero-sum'' game in which the ultimate losers are the people living here.

The chancellor argued persuasively that without such an approach, Ohio will fail to increase substantially its puny percentage of adults with at least an associate's degree. It will fail to become sufficiently competitive in the global, knowledge economy.

For the state's one free-standing medical school, Fingerhut proposed important changes. He rightly took aim at a NEOUCOM board structure that equally represents the consortium schools, the University of Akron, Kent State University and Youngstown State. Too often, the temptation is for the universities to put their own interests ahead of the medical school and the region. Fingerhut called for an independent, nine-member board appointed by the governor, similar to regimes at the other public universities.

More, Cleveland State would join the universities feeding students to the medical school. NEOUCOM would gain a presence in Cleveland dedicated to training primary-care doctors. The medical school would come to Akron, too. Fingerhut gave his support to a proposal by the University of Akron, the city's hospitals and the medical school to develop an orthopedic research institute.

All of that does not involve a merger or a move. It does set in motion a closer relationship. It defines clear missions for the medical school's expansions into Akron and Cleveland, positioning NEOUCOM to help drive the region forward.

Worth emphasis is the warning Fingerhut issued, firmly and fairly. He noted the ''formidable'' challenge facing the development of an orthopedic center. He cited the need for constant focus, the ''intense'' competition for research talent and dollars. He underscored that developing an institute worthy of ''world class'' will not be easy. The challenge is the same one facing the university system as a whole. Efforts must be serious, sustained and committed, and frankly, the state must play a larger role in routing additional resources to universities.

The chancellor promised public, annual reviews of how universities in this region are meeting the ambitious goals. He didn't pull the punch: If there isn't progress, he will think again about what the universities must do to serve the larger interest of Ohio.

On Thursday, speaking at the Akron Roundtable, Eric Fingerhut unveiled much about the 10-year plan for higher education that he will present to the governor and legislature at the end of the month. The chancellor of the Ohio Board of Regents noted the ''resistance to change'' already encountered. He also made plain that a struggling Ohio must demand that its universities reorganize into ''centers of excellence,'' pursuing distinct missions designed to advance the state economy.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button