Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Blogs:
Pets:
Summit teams up with Rescue Waggin' to save dogs
The Heldenfiles:
Songs for an American Day
Patrick McManamon:
For your Saturday entertainment …
Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Northern Illinois
Browns Bulletin:
Single-game ticket sales begin July 11
Tribe Matters:
Laffey making it tough on self
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana
Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Updated: Free Agency: Another Gone - Apparently
All Da King's Men:
IPCC Already Wrong About Global Warming
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Wow….Sarah Palin Resigns Governorship
Akron Law Café:
Abraham Lincoln and the Fourth of July
Varsity Letters:
Highland senior receives honor
See Jane Style:
Picnic Wear
Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Hate Crime in Fort Worth Texas: "That F***t had it Coming"
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Linda asks-where is the Ohio Chautauqua?
Sound Check:
Rundgren fans rejoice!: Second night of AWATS at The Civic added
HRLite House:
Morscruethal Behaviors or Just Lip Service?
Akron Gamer:
Hot link: Best of Nintendo at E3
Ted Strickland proposed the necessary framework for an energy plan. Jon Husted then added critical and promising detail
Published on Tuesday, Mar 25, 2008
Ted Strickland recognizes the priority of energy efficiency. The governor included in his energy plan last summer measures to improve the state's performance, and the Ohio Senate agreed. Unfortunately, the proposal isn't as ambitious or helpful as it sounds. The governor focuses narrowly on future growth of electricity, still leaving the state with a weak energy efficiency program.
Better, as Speaker Jon Husted argues, to pursue more efficient overall use of electricity, in other words, current and future load. The speaker hasn't fallen for a rosy scenario. His efficiency benchmarks are realistic, calling for a 0.3 percent reduction in 2009, reaching 1 percent in 2014 and 2 percent annually from 2019 to 2025. All told, the reduction, or efficiency factor, would be an accumulated 22 percent.
Why take such a course? Virtually all indications are that Ohio and the country will experience a substantial increase in demand for electricity during the next 25 years. Feeding that appetite will strain capacity — and thus the wisdom of an aggressive renewable and advanced energy portfolio. The least expensive way to enhance capacity is improved efficiency.
Janine Migden-Ostrander, the Ohio Consumers' Counsel, explains that constructing a new nuclear power plant or ''clean'' coal-fired plant would cost roughly $4,000 for every kilowatt hour of capacity. The price of energy efficiency? An estimated $400 for every kilowatt hour saved.
A recent study by the Ohio Environmental Council noted that efficiency technologies can be implemented for 2.25 cents per kilowatt hour. That compares favorably with new wind power (4.9 cents per kilowatt hour) and biomass (7.9 cents).
No surprise that Speaker Husted, many economists, environmental groups and a significant share of businesses see the value in energy efficiency. Still, many large manufacturers haven't been persuaded. They contend that such an efficiency push would be ''anti-economic development.'' The ultimate timidity of the governor's appears driven by their concern. The view is shortsighted, neglectful of what looms, the promise of increased demand and tighter environmental controls, whether through technology or a carbon tax of some kind.
Migden-Ostrander rightly describes energy efficiency as the ''first line of defense'' against future cost increases. That hardly sounds anti-development. In time, energy efficiency will spur economic growth. Do the job right, and Ohio would gain a reputation as more forward-thinking (not exactly the view now). Here is a chance to reshape the state economy in a productive way. Follow the cue of Speaker Husted, and Ohio would seize the opportunity.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
