Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Night Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
For your Saturday entertainment …

Akron Zips:
Hitchens leads Zips in second-half comeback

Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster

Cleveland Browns:
Holmgren expresses interest in Browns position

Kent State Sports:
Kent State blown out in second half, loses to Temple 47-13

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers

Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad

Varsity Letters:
Four area football teams play tonight

All Da King's Men:
Headed For Disaster

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Will Health Care Reform Pass?

Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (69) The Brookings Institute Study on "Bending the Curve" – Four General Strategies

See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic

Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Silverdome Potentially SOLD!

Ohio Travels with Betty:
George is looking for a Thanksgiving buffet in Akron.

Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall

HRLite House:
Colloquium at University of Akron

Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go

Polar bears on thin ice

These creatures deserve the protection of the Endangered Species Act

Published on Tuesday, May 06, 2008

In December 2006, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed coming to the rescue of the threatened polar bear. The agency called for providing protections permitted under the federal Endangered Species Act. Sound science drove the decision, and yet the Bush White House has resisted the step the past 16 months.

Thankfully, a federal judge recently ran out of patience, ordering the Department of the Interior to make a decision about the polar bear by May 15.

The Center for Biological Diversity points to the deepening trouble faced by polar bears. In 2007, the shrinkage of summer sea ice reached a stunning 1 million square miles below the average from 1979 to 2000. Scientists have projected that by 2030 (or earlier), the Arctic may be free of ice, something that has not occurred for 800,000 years.

The U.S. Geological Survey forecasts that by 2050, the polar bear population will decline by two-thirds.

Why has the Bush White House balked at taking action? Officials have pointed to the complexity of the issue and expressed concern about projections amounting largely to speculation. All of this has seemed more dodge than anything else. Confront the plight of the polar bear, and you must look squarely at the consequences of global warming.

Polar bears aren't diminishing at the hand of hunters, or due to the likes of DDT that harmed bald eagles. They are victims of the greenhouse gases from power plants, cars and other inventions of humans driving the melting of Arctic ice. The polar bear deserves the protection of the Endangered Species Act, just as the country deserves leaders ready to face the hard work of combating climate change.

In December 2006, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed coming to the rescue of the threatened polar bear. The agency called for providing protections permitted under the federal Endangered Species Act. Sound science drove the decision, and yet the Bush White House has resisted the step the past 16 months.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button















Most Commented Stories