Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Akron Law Café:
Exxon Saved From the Rocks: The Supreme Court Limits Punitive Damages

The Heldenfiles:
Happy Day

Balanced Ledger:
Olympics, interested?

Patrick McManamon:
Yellowstone, C.C. Sabathia, Brian Windhorst and … yes … Yellowstone

Browns Bulletin:
ESPN's Browns love-in chugs along

Cleveland Browns:
Bentley leaves minicamp

Cleveland Indians:
Spanked on Independence Day

Akron Aeros:
All Stars, Roster Moves and More!

Akron Zips:
Contemplating fall camp

Varsity Letters:
CVCA junior soccer stars Speas & Mason to play at UA

Kent State Sports:
Jarvis on Maxwell watch list

Ohio Politics:
2008 = 1972? 1976? 1992? 2000? 2004?

All Da King's Men:
Words For Independence Day

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Dependence Day

Akrocentric:
Charles Taormina discusses "Acceptance of Individual Authors," self-publishing resources

Akron Gamer:
Harmonix keeps on Rock'n

BokBluster:
Patriot Games

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Is there an American Girl store in Ohio?

Olympic Dreams - Running:
Back to Phase One

Sound Check:
Tim McGraw wows and woos Blossom

Tia's Trends:
Saks Saleswoman Accused of Stealing $1 Million

Polar bears on thin ice

These creatures deserve the protection of the Endangered Species Act

In December 2006, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed coming to the rescue of the threatened polar bear. The agency called for providing protections permitted under the federal Endangered Species Act. Sound science drove the decision, and yet the Bush White House has resisted the step the past 16 months.

Thankfully, a federal judge recently ran out of patience, ordering the Department of the Interior to make a decision about the polar bear by May 15.

The Center for Biological Diversity points to the deepening trouble faced by polar bears. In 2007, the shrinkage of summer sea ice reached a stunning 1 million square miles below the average from 1979 to 2000. Scientists have projected that by 2030 (or earlier), the Arctic may be free of ice, something that has not occurred for 800,000 years.

The U.S. Geological Survey forecasts that by 2050, the polar bear population will decline by two-thirds.

Why has the Bush White House balked at taking action? Officials have pointed to the complexity of the issue and expressed concern about projections amounting largely to speculation. All of this has seemed more dodge than anything else. Confront the plight of the polar bear, and you must look squarely at the consequences of global warming.

Polar bears aren't diminishing at the hand of hunters, or due to the likes of DDT that harmed bald eagles. They are victims of the greenhouse gases from power plants, cars and other inventions of humans driving the melting of Arctic ice. The polar bear deserves the protection of the Endangered Species Act, just as the country deserves leaders ready to face the hard work of combating climate change.

In December 2006, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service proposed coming to the rescue of the threatened polar bear. The agency called for providing protections permitted under the federal Endangered Species Act. Sound science drove the decision, and yet the Bush White House has resisted the step the past 16 months.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button