Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Akron Law Café:
College Football is Un-American

The Heldenfiles:
Cheryl Holdridge, R.I.P.

Tribe Matters:
Shapiro puts Indians in position to win

Patrick McManamon:
ESPN clears up a key to tonight's game

Browns Bulletin:
Browns may interview ex-Broncos GM

Cleveland Browns:
Mangini takes command

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Celtics

CavsHQ: A Fan's View:
The Countdown Begins - Cavs v. Celtics

Akron Zips:
Five things you should know about Miami

Varsity Letters:
Ignatius’ Kyle has busy offseason

Kent State Sports:
Volleyball players earn All-Academic honors

Car Chase:
January is auction time

See Jane Style:
Chicago Chic?

All Da King's Men:
Obama's Economic News Conference

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Why Israeli Leaders Terrorize Palestinians

HRLite House:
The Psychology Channel, Interesting Videos, Jobs in I-O, and Happy Birthday Elvis

Akron Gamer:
Games in '09: Resident Evil 5

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Does Ohio have an Andy Warhol Museum?

Sound Check:
Axl Rose speaks on Guns & Rose(s)

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 Extended

Too many children left behind

The disappointing results of the Reading First program

The ability to read is so fundamental to progress in school that it justifies spending money, time and effort to ensure that children acquire reading skills early.

One of the laudable aspects of the 2002 No Child Left Behind law is its emphasis on improving the reading skills of low-income children in underperforming elementary schools. The federal education law set up the Reading First program, which directs $1 billion a year in grants to qualified school districts for that purpose. The program reaches some 1.5 million children in about 5,200 schools, focusing on phonics, vocabulary, fluency and comprehension.

How disappointing, then, that the interim report last week from the U.S. Department of Education concluded Reading First has not yielded the expected results. Part of a large-scale assessment of the program (the final report is due in the fall), the interim report said the gains in comprehension scores were not significantly different between Reading First schools and others that were not in the program.

The study found, though, that Reading First teachers spent an extra 10 minutes a day on reading skills. Also, schools that spent more money per pupil performed better, reinforcing the value of a focused approach, rather than thinly spreading grants across the district. Put another way, there should be no illusions about the time, money and instructional creativity required for the nation to bring children up to speed in low-achieving schools.

The ability to read is so fundamental to progress in school that it justifies spending money, time and effort to ensure that children acquire reading skills early.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


















Most Commented Stories