Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Zeke, the basketball playing dog

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
For your Saturday entertainment …

Akron Zips:
Six new scholarship offers

Browns Bulletin:
Quick thought on Browns rookies

Tribe Matters:
Tribe roster on hold?

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana

Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Andy’s Signed According to ESPN

All Da King's Men:
Baby Got Barack !

Blog of Mass Destruction:
The Rogue Bush White House

Akron Law Café:
New Wiretapping Revelations from Inspector General

Varsity Letters:
Report: Ontko selects Wisconsin

See Jane Style:
Oh Baby!

Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Closings….Not the Good Kind!

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Margy inquires-when is a Taste of Hudson?

Sound Check:
LeVert II live performance Saturday night — "Dedication" album due July 13,

HRLite House:
DDI One of Best Places to Work

Akron Gamer:
Video game sales drop in May

Too many children left behind

The disappointing results of the Reading First program

The ability to read is so fundamental to progress in school that it justifies spending money, time and effort to ensure that children acquire reading skills early.

One of the laudable aspects of the 2002 No Child Left Behind law is its emphasis on improving the reading skills of low-income children in underperforming elementary schools. The federal education law set up the Reading First program, which directs $1 billion a year in grants to qualified school districts for that purpose. The program reaches some 1.5 million children in about 5,200 schools, focusing on phonics, vocabulary, fluency and comprehension.

How disappointing, then, that the interim report last week from the U.S. Department of Education concluded Reading First has not yielded the expected results. Part of a large-scale assessment of the program (the final report is due in the fall), the interim report said the gains in comprehension scores were not significantly different between Reading First schools and others that were not in the program.

The study found, though, that Reading First teachers spent an extra 10 minutes a day on reading skills. Also, schools that spent more money per pupil performed better, reinforcing the value of a focused approach, rather than thinly spreading grants across the district. Put another way, there should be no illusions about the time, money and instructional creativity required for the nation to bring children up to speed in low-achieving schools.

The ability to read is so fundamental to progress in school that it justifies spending money, time and effort to ensure that children acquire reading skills early.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories