Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
More dancing dogs, the Salsa edition

The Heldenfiles:
Tuesday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
First and 10: Some ideas for a better second half

Akron Zips:
MAC Roundtable

Tribe Matters:
Indians announce spring dates

Cleveland Browns:
Mangini doesn't name a quarterback

Kent State Sports:
Bye week coming at good time for Flashes

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Shaq: It’s All About Winning Championships

Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes Roll 100-60 / Season Outlook

Varsity Letters:
Report: Walsh baseball player commits

All Da King's Men:
More On The Fort Hood Jihadist

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Simply Incapable of Telling The Truth

Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (63) Commonwealth Fund Report on Primary Care

See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler

Car Chase:
Clock Tender- Extending the Life of Collector Car Clocks

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Rumors: Akron Starbucks Closing

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.

Sound Check:
Aeromsith looking for new singer as Steven Tyler contemplates solo career

HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio

Akron Gamer:
Video: 'Modern Warfare 2' hits the streets

Yes, he can

Barack Obama spins his way out of public financing of his campaign

Barack Obama spins with the very best. The latest evidence? It arrived on Thursday in the form of a Web cast, the Democratic presidential nominee explaining why he will break a pledge and opt out of public financing for the fall election. He reasoned (disingenuously) that he was doing so for the American people, refusing to participate in a ''broken'' system, suggesting that his huge army of donors represents an improved brand of reform.

The Illinois senator deserves credit for his innovative fund-raising, his campaign reporting that 93 percent of his 3 million contributions have been $200 or less. When you're seeking the presidency, campaign money makes a big difference, and Obama may raise as much as three times the $84 million available through public financing to John McCain.

Difficult to swallow is the sheer expediency. When Obama earlier fanned the impression that he was eager to use the public money, he hardly lamented the broken system. He did contend that public financing was a good thing because it diminished the time candidates spent at fund-raisers and allowed more time for debate. Now the candidate of change will be the first to reject public money (the system launched in 1976, following the Watergate scandal that brought down Richard Nixon).

Worst of all was Obama's lame contention that the Republicans made him to do it. He described Republicans as masters at ''gaming'' the system, routing political money into independent groups that generate attack ads. No question, Republicans play hardball. Still, Democrats are likely in this election year to collect more independent money than Republicans, and the likes of MoveOn.org know how to punch.

Again, Barack Obama knew all about ''swift-boating'' when he talked about ''aggressively'' pursuing an agreement with the Republican presidential nominee ''to preserve a publicly financed general election.'' What he didn't know was how much money he would raise, and thus, today the aggressive spin.

Barack Obama spins with the very best. The latest evidence? It arrived on Thursday in the form of a Web cast, the Democratic presidential nominee explaining why he will break a pledge and opt out of public financing for the fall election. He reasoned (disingenuously) that he was doing so for the American people, refusing to participate in a ''broken'' system, suggesting that his huge army of donors represents an improved brand of reform.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories