Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Lakemore police say man killed his wife in standoff
Suspect in Lakemore standoff expected to recover
Police raid Akron gaming parlor
Storm could bring heavy snow tonight, Saturday; Parking bans in effect
Akron bridge closed for emergency
Palin says she's been exploited by Couric and Fey
Suspected meth lab busted in Cuyahoga Falls
Blogs:
Akron Law Café:
College Football is Un-American
The Heldenfiles:
Cheryl Holdridge, R.I.P.
Tribe Matters:
Pavano likes fresh start
Patrick McManamon:
Cavs vs. Celtics — live as it happens
Browns Bulletin:
Browns may interview ex-Broncos GM
Cleveland Browns:
Mangini takes command
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Celtics
CavsHQ: A Fan's View:
The Countdown Begins - Cavs v. Celtics
Akron Zips:
Five things you should know about Miami
Varsity Letters:
Ignatius’ Kyle has busy offseason
Kent State Sports:
Volleyball players earn All-Academic honors
Car Chase:
January is auction time
See Jane Style:
Chicago Chic?
All Da King's Men:
Obama's Economic News Conference
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Why Israeli Leaders Terrorize Palestinians
HRLite House:
The Psychology Channel, Interesting Videos, Jobs in I-O, and Happy Birthday Elvis
Akron Gamer:
Games in '09: Resident Evil 5
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Does Ohio have an Andy Warhol Museum?
Sound Check:
Axl Rose speaks on Guns & Rose(s)
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 Extended
A federal appeals court says the Bush White House is too green.
Now Congress must ensure states have the tools to curb air pollution
POSTED: 12:41 a.m. EST, Jul 29, 2008
Chris Korleski, the director of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, appears today before a U.S. Senate subcommittee to discuss the state's challenge in meeting federal requirements to reduce air pollution. A federal appeals court recently made compliance substantially more difficult. The panel rejected the Clean Air Interstate Rule, a set of regulations long in the making, the product of an intelligent compromise pushed by the Bush administration and embraced by environmental groups.
The hope is that Korleski will argue strongly that the federal EPA revamp the regulations to meet court approval, or that Congress act to clear the way for implementation of the rule.
For years, the many players, from the White House and power companies to states and environmentalists, tangled over the question of how to curb air pollution when emissions travel across state boundaries. In 2005, the federal EPA unveiled its answer, reflecting the varied input and political struggles. The Clean Air Interstate Rule covered Ohio and 27 other states in the eastern half of the country. It called for a roughly 70 percent reduction in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions (leading contributors to smog) by the 2020s. The EPA estimated that the rule would generate almost $100 billion in annual health benefits, preventing 17,000 premature deaths nationwide (1,743 in Ohio).
A projected yearly benefit of $2 billion would be achieved for national parks in the East, including the Great Smoky Mountains and the Shenandoah.
To achieve these advances, the Clean Air Interstate Rule established a ''cap and trade'' arrangement, the EPA setting emission limits, polluting companies buying and selling allowances, leaving room for market incentives and flexibility in meeting the goal. Companies challenged the rule in court largely because of their unhappiness with the way the allowances would be distributed.
Unfortunately, the appeals court traveled far beyond that argument, siding with the contention that Congress hadn't given the EPA sufficient authority to assert itself as it did. Actually, the Clean Air Act invites aggressive action to meet its defining objective — protecting public health.
More dismaying: The rule is the product of what is expected of the political world, checks and balances in motion, the interested parties giving and taking, all leading to a beneficial result. The president has more environmental achievements than his critics suggest (curbing diesel pollution, for instance). At the same time, this isn't a green White House. Hard to believe the administration would so exceed its authority in setting environmental regulations.
Of the things the president would like to achieve before his tenure ends in five months, a replacement for the Clear Air Interstate Rule should reside near the top of the list. Best of all, the objective is realistic. Those with a stake already have agreed on the merits. Now it is a matter of getting past the courts.
Chris Korleski, the director of the Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, appears today before a U.S. Senate subcommittee to discuss the state's challenge in meeting federal requirements to reduce air pollution. A federal appeals court recently made compliance substantially more difficult. The panel rejected the Clean Air Interstate Rule, a set of regulations long in the making, the product of an intelligent compromise pushed by the Bush administration and embraced by environmental groups.
The hope is that Korleski will argue strongly that the federal EPA revamp the regulations to meet court approval, or that Congress act to clear the way for implementation of the rule.
For years, the many players, from the White House and power companies to states and environmentalists, tangled over the question of how to curb air pollution when emissions travel across state boundaries. In 2005, the federal EPA unveiled its answer, reflecting the varied input and political struggles. The Clean Air Interstate Rule covered Ohio and 27 other states in the eastern half of the country. It called for a roughly 70 percent reduction in sulfur dioxide and nitrogen oxide emissions (leading contributors to smog) by the 2020s. The EPA estimated that the rule would generate almost $100 billion in annual health benefits, preventing 17,000 premature deaths nationwide (1,743 in Ohio).
A projected yearly benefit of $2 billion would be achieved for national parks in the East, including the Great Smoky Mountains and the Shenandoah.
To achieve these advances, the Clean Air Interstate Rule established a ''cap and trade'' arrangement, the EPA setting emission limits, polluting companies buying and selling allowances, leaving room for market incentives and flexibility in meeting the goal. Companies challenged the rule in court largely because of their unhappiness with the way the allowances would be distributed.
Unfortunately, the appeals court traveled far beyond that argument, siding with the contention that Congress hadn't given the EPA sufficient authority to assert itself as it did. Actually, the Clean Air Act invites aggressive action to meet its defining objective — protecting public health.
More dismaying: The rule is the product of what is expected of the political world, checks and balances in motion, the interested parties giving and taking, all leading to a beneficial result. The president has more environmental achievements than his critics suggest (curbing diesel pollution, for instance). At the same time, this isn't a green White House. Hard to believe the administration would so exceed its authority in setting environmental regulations.
Of the things the president would like to achieve before his tenure ends in five months, a replacement for the Clear Air Interstate Rule should reside near the top of the list. Best of all, the objective is realistic. Those with a stake already have agreed on the merits. Now it is a matter of getting past the courts.
Comments
Click here to post your comments