Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Summit teams up with Rescue Waggin' to save dogs

The Heldenfiles:
Songs for an American Day

Patrick McManamon:
For your Saturday entertainment …

Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Northern Illinois

Browns Bulletin:
Single-game ticket sales begin July 11

Tribe Matters:
Laffey making it tough on self

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana

Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Updated: Free Agency: Another Gone - Apparently

All Da King's Men:
IPCC Already Wrong About Global Warming

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Wow….Sarah Palin Resigns Governorship

Akron Law Café:
Abraham Lincoln and the Fourth of July

Varsity Letters:
Highland senior receives honor

See Jane Style:
Picnic Wear

Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Hate Crime in Fort Worth Texas: "That F***t had it Coming"

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Linda asks-where is the Ohio Chautauqua?

Sound Check:
Rundgren fans rejoice!: Second night of AWATS at The Civic added

HRLite House:
Morscruethal Behaviors or Just Lip Service?

Akron Gamer:
Hot link: Best of Nintendo at E3

Deadline for a deal

The governor rightly wants to avoid a messy campaign about sick pay. That means the various players must deliver a smart compromise now

Ted Strickland rightly argues that Ohio would suffer if a significant share of the fall campaign involved a noisy and expensive fight over a statewide ballot issue calling for mandated, paid sick leave for employees. The governor set today as a deadline for reaching a compromise that would advance the interests of workers yet avoid the many flaws in the proposed Healthy Families Act. If the various players need an incentive to reach agreement, they would do well to look at a Quinnipiac University poll reaffirming that roughly 70 percent of voters approve the ballot issue.

To be sure, that percentage likely would fall once opponents mounted their campaign. That is just the governor's point. A mammoth effort would be required, Ohioans exchanging blows, hardly a flattering picture. More, if the measure prevailed, the state would be stuck with a poorly written and poorly conceived mandate, something that would greatly harm the business climate and job creation.

Again, the concept of paid sick leave isn't the problem. Many companies already provide the benefit, grasping, among other things, the value in attracting and retaining good employees. At the same time, many small businesses simply cannot afford paid sick leave. Thus, any reasonable compromise must address the proposed threshold requiring companies with at least 25 employees to meet the mandate. Better 50 workers? Seventy-five?

In addition, many small firms will struggle to cover the cost of seven mandated sick days each year. Flexibility in this area must be part of a compromise.

Perhaps most dismaying about the proposal, pushed largely by the Service Employees International Union, is the failure to appreciate that a workplace involves employees and employers. The proposal often reads like a wish list of unions. A smaller business cannot be managed effectively if employees are permitted to take paid sick leave an hour at a time. The proposal invites abuse. It lacks clarity regarding how the measure would apply to company sick leave policies already in place. It even fails to define precisely what is an ''employee.''

It is chilling to think of the trouble that would ensue for Ohio if the ballot issue became law as proposed. Consider the avalanche of litigation alone. Remember, too, that proponents already have the signatures necessary to reach the ballot.

All of this signals why it is important for the governor and his negotiating partners, including the Ohio Business Roundtable, to succeed in reaching an intelligent compromise. The point often is made that Ohio would be the first state to have mandated paid sick leave. (The California legislature cast aside the idea earlier this month.) Such a mandate could be beneficial if it is smartly and carefully crafted.

That isn't the case now, and the businesses working with the governor have made plain that if a reasonable compromise isn't reached, they will fight vigorously to defeat the ballot issue — as they should.

Ted Strickland rightly argues that Ohio would suffer if a significant share of the fall campaign involved a noisy and expensive fight over a statewide ballot issue calling for mandated, paid sick leave for employees. The governor set today as a deadline for reaching a compromise that would advance the interests of workers yet avoid the many flaws in the proposed Healthy Families Act. If the various players need an incentive to reach agreement, they would do well to look at a Quinnipiac University poll reaffirming that roughly 70 percent of voters approve the ballot issue.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories