Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Lakemore police say man killed his wife in standoff
Suspect in Lakemore standoff expected to recover
Police raid Akron gaming parlor
Storm could bring heavy snow tonight, Saturday; Parking bans in effect
Akron bridge closed for emergency
Palin says she's been exploited by Couric and Fey
Suspected meth lab busted in Cuyahoga Falls
Blogs:
Akron Law Café:
College Football is Un-American
The Heldenfiles:
Cheryl Holdridge, R.I.P.
Tribe Matters:
Shapiro puts Indians in position to win
Patrick McManamon:
Cavs vs. Celtics — live as it happens
Browns Bulletin:
Browns may interview ex-Broncos GM
Cleveland Browns:
Mangini takes command
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Celtics
CavsHQ: A Fan's View:
The Countdown Begins - Cavs v. Celtics
Akron Zips:
Five things you should know about Miami
Varsity Letters:
Ignatius’ Kyle has busy offseason
Kent State Sports:
Volleyball players earn All-Academic honors
Car Chase:
January is auction time
See Jane Style:
Chicago Chic?
All Da King's Men:
Obama's Economic News Conference
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Why Israeli Leaders Terrorize Palestinians
HRLite House:
The Psychology Channel, Interesting Videos, Jobs in I-O, and Happy Birthday Elvis
Akron Gamer:
Games in '09: Resident Evil 5
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Does Ohio have an Andy Warhol Museum?
Sound Check:
Axl Rose speaks on Guns & Rose(s)
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 Extended
The governor rightly wants to avoid a messy campaign about sick pay. That means the various players must deliver a smart compromise now
Published on Friday, Aug 15, 2008
To be sure, that percentage likely would fall once opponents mounted their campaign. That is just the governor's point. A mammoth effort would be required, Ohioans exchanging blows, hardly a flattering picture. More, if the measure prevailed, the state would be stuck with a poorly written and poorly conceived mandate, something that would greatly harm the business climate and job creation.
Again, the concept of paid sick leave isn't the problem. Many companies already provide the benefit, grasping, among other things, the value in attracting and retaining good employees. At the same time, many small businesses simply cannot afford paid sick leave. Thus, any reasonable compromise must address the proposed threshold requiring companies with at least 25 employees to meet the mandate. Better 50 workers? Seventy-five?
In addition, many small firms will struggle to cover the cost of seven mandated sick days each year. Flexibility in this area must be part of a compromise.
Perhaps most dismaying about the proposal, pushed largely by the Service Employees International Union, is the failure to appreciate that a workplace involves employees and employers. The proposal often reads like a wish list of unions. A smaller business cannot be managed effectively if employees are permitted to take paid sick leave an hour at a time. The proposal invites abuse. It lacks clarity regarding how the measure would apply to company sick leave policies already in place. It even fails to define precisely what is an ''employee.''
It is chilling to think of the trouble that would ensue for Ohio if the ballot issue became law as proposed. Consider the avalanche of litigation alone. Remember, too, that proponents already have the signatures necessary to reach the ballot.
All of this signals why it is important for the governor and his negotiating partners, including the Ohio Business Roundtable, to succeed in reaching an intelligent compromise. The point often is made that Ohio would be the first state to have mandated paid sick leave. (The California legislature cast aside the idea earlier this month.) Such a mandate could be beneficial if it is smartly and carefully crafted.
That isn't the case now, and the businesses working with the governor have made plain that if a reasonable compromise isn't reached, they will fight vigorously to defeat the ballot issue as they should.
Get the full article here.

