Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Man robbed at Tallmadge Avenue eatery
Four teens restrain man, take items from his Akron home
Police: Ohio girl dies after fall into snow bank
Complaints against officer keep coming
Another winter punch heading toward Ohio
Cuyahoga Falls residents come home to find burning couch on balcony
Blogs:
First Bell - On Education:
No City of Akron basketball tonight
Pets:
Pet telethon re-airs
The Heldenfiles:
Chipmunks "Squeakquel" on DVD/BD March 30
Akron Zips:
Late surge gives Zips ugly road win
Tribe Matters:
Blogmail response on Hafner
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth's contract terminated
Balanced Ledger:
QB in Browns future: another mock draft
Kent State Sports:
KSU Notes – February 9
Cleveland Cavaliers:
NBA Power Rankings from Around the Internet
Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes grab 18 players on signing day
Varsity Letters:
Garfield at Buchtel basketball
All Da King's Men:
Palin At The Tea Party Convention
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Republican Pre-Conditions
Akron Law Café:
Citizens United v. F.E.C. (Part 4): Kennedy's and O'Connor's Basic Approaches to Constitutional Decisionmaking – Top Down and Bottom Up
Car Chase:
Collector Car Hobby Loses One of the Best—Jim Roll
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Decisions Decisions: Credit Cards or Your Mortgage?
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Loucile is looking for a Lake Erie getaway in June for three kids, ages 1, 3, and 5.
Sound Check:
Talk of the Town – Top entertainment picks for the weekend
HRLite House:
Track HR Research
Akron Gamer:
'Tecmo Bowl' recreation of Super Bowl XLIV
See Jane Style:
Do IT this week: Layering
Ohioans for Healthy Families avoids a headache for Ohio
Published on Friday, Sep 05, 2008
The coalition, led by the Service Employees International Union, pushed for more than a year a proposal that would guarantee seven paid sick days annually to workers in companies with 25 or more employees. Proponents argued that workers shouldn't lose pay when they have to take time off to care for themselves or an ailing family member.
The impulse was right to seek reasonable protections for the income of workers, particularly employees of small businesses, faced with illness. Unfortunately, the proposed legislation was so poorly formulated it strayed well beyond the reasonable. For instance, under the proposal, workers could take sick leave in hourly increments and for up to three days without obtaining medical certification.
The proposal lacked clarity on other provisions, including whether workers could carry over unused sick days to the next year or be compensated for those days when they left an employer.
Proponents could contend that for an Ohio trying to attract and retain workers, a worker-friendly mandate such as Issue 4 has its appeal. True, but the far more compelling argument was on the opponents' side. For both small and large employers, the benefit promised increased costs, scheduling disruptions, loss of flexibility in negotiating sick leave and the hassle of tracking employee sick leave by the hour.
Not surprisingly, the proposal drew broad, bipartisan and uniform opposition, putting business groups, legislative leaders and Gov. Ted Strickland's administration on the same page. Strickland tried and failed last month to negotiate a compromise proposal with the coalition. It is a credit to him and leaders of the coalition that they continued the discussion, and arrived at the necessary conclusion. Ohio hardly needed an expensive and bitter campaign over an issue harmful to the retooling of its economy.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
