Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Akron Law Café:
College Football is Un-American

The Heldenfiles:
Cheryl Holdridge, R.I.P.

Tribe Matters:
Shapiro puts Indians in position to win

Patrick McManamon:
ESPN clears up a key to tonight's game

Browns Bulletin:
Browns may interview ex-Broncos GM

Cleveland Browns:
Mangini takes command

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Celtics

CavsHQ: A Fan's View:
The Countdown Begins - Cavs v. Celtics

Akron Zips:
Five things you should know about Miami

Varsity Letters:
Ignatius’ Kyle has busy offseason

Kent State Sports:
Volleyball players earn All-Academic honors

Car Chase:
January is auction time

See Jane Style:
Chicago Chic?

All Da King's Men:
Obama's Economic News Conference

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Why Israeli Leaders Terrorize Palestinians

HRLite House:
The Psychology Channel, Interesting Videos, Jobs in I-O, and Happy Birthday Elvis

Akron Gamer:
Games in '09: Resident Evil 5

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Does Ohio have an Andy Warhol Museum?

Sound Check:
Axl Rose speaks on Guns & Rose(s)

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007 Extended

Against the odds

Even a gambling operation opposes Issue 6

Opponents of the latest proposal to bring casino gambling to Ohio have an unexpected ally. Penn National Gaming, the nation's third-largest gambling company, supports a group called the ''No on Issue 6 Committee'' to fight the gambling issue approved last week for the Nov. 4 ballot.

What irks the Pennsylvania-based firm is that Issue 6, a proposed amendment to the Ohio constitution, would grant a monopoly to another gambling operation, Lakes Entertainment of Minnesota. Lakes wants to build a massive casino complex near Wilmington in struggling Clinton County.

Penn National, of course, worries about its own survival. It owns Toledo's Raceway Park and a riverboat casino in Indiana, near Cincinnati.

Still, Penn has a point. Issue 6 is even worse than a similar ballot initiative two years ago, which would have opened the door to seven racetrack owners and two Cleveland developers to operate electronic slot machines, with no competitive bidding.

This battle between gambling interests should serve to remind Ohioans of the larger stakes. The two companies are fighting so hard because they have so much to gain at the expense of Ohioans.

The committee backing Issue 6, MyOhioNow, makes the point in its television ads that gambling dollars are flowing out of Ohio and into the coffers of neighboring states. What backers don't say is that most of the profits from their casino would go to Minnesota. And the jobs here? Relatively low-paying, dead-end service jobs.

Further, there is no guarantee that a 30 percent tax on gross receipts (less payouts) would generate the $240 million MyOhioNow projects, with the lure that most of the money would flow back to Ohio counties. The rate is a maximum, and could be adjusted by the legislature. If tax-free Indian gaming comes in, the tax burden on the Clinton County facility would drop to zero.

Even if the money flows, the state, with pressing budget problems, could easily reduce local government funds to counties. Voters will likely miss the distinction and the need to raise taxes. After all, many believe the Ohio Lottery fixed school funding.

Ohioans have rejected casino-style gambling three times since 1990. Those in opposition, gathered under the ''Vote No Casinos Committee,'' correctly emphasize the social impact, the expanded number of Ohioans addicted to gambling driving up the social cost of dealing with families driven into debt.

Is Issue 6 a tool for economic development? Yes, for the casino owner. Otherwise, it's a loser.

Opponents of the latest proposal to bring casino gambling to Ohio have an unexpected ally. Penn National Gaming, the nation's third-largest gambling company, supports a group called the ''No on Issue 6 Committee'' to fight the gambling issue approved last week for the Nov. 4 ballot.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


justsayyes

Posted 10:28 AM, 10/02/2008

What exactly are you thinking? Do you people personally have relatives that are problem gamblers? This will bring jobs into this state and will create a fun atmosphere. You seem to be under the elusion that casinos are forcing people to come and play. People play for ENTERTAINMENT. Every time this issue comes up this whole paper is SO conservative. We need gaming in Ohio.


















Most Commented Stories