Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Akron judge Linda Kersker dies
DiLullo's closes doors after 63 years
Portage man beaten at home, robbed of coins
Akron police arrest murder suspect within an hour
Call center to cut 250 jobs in Akron
Rib, White and Blue is festival of tastes
Man fit for trial in rape of girl, 2
UPDATE: Deadly motorcycle crash closes I-76
Blogs:
Pets:
Summit teams up with Rescue Waggin' to save dogs
The Heldenfiles:
I Hate "More To Love"
Patrick McManamon:
Ron Artest goes to the Lakers
Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Northern Illinois
Browns Bulletin:
Single-game ticket sales begin July 11
Tribe Matters:
Tribe needs to slow down opponents
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana
Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Updated: Free Agency: Another Gone - Apparently
All Da King's Men:
IPCC Already Wrong About Global Warming
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Wow….Sarah Palin Resigns Governorship
Akron Law Café:
Abraham Lincoln and the Fourth of July
Varsity Letters:
Highland senior receives honor
See Jane Style:
Picnic Wear
Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Hate Crime in Fort Worth Texas: "That F***t had it Coming"
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Linda asks-where is the Ohio Chautauqua?
Sound Check:
Rundgren fans rejoice!: Second night of AWATS at The Civic added
HRLite House:
Sport Psychology and Performance Consulting
Akron Gamer:
Hot link: Best of Nintendo at E3
The moment called for leadership on Capitol Hill. Too many House members lacked the nerve
POSTED: 10:32 a.m. EDT, Sep 30, 2008
Betty Sutton proudly waved her opposition to the proposed $700 billion package designed to help restore stability to beleaguered financial markets. The Copley Township Democrat issued a statement cudgeling ''an arrogant and reckless Bush administration.'' She dismissed provisions designed to provide oversight and accountability as weak and ineffective. What Sutton really understood is that many Americans oppose the bailout, and she leaped to the front of the parade — along with a narrow majority of her colleagues, Republicans and Democrats, the House rejecting the bailout by a 228-205 vote.
A profile in courage? Hardly. The more difficult task involved explaining to those angry Americans (and who isn't furious?) that as unpalatable as the bailout is, the alternative is worse, credit markets freezing further, putting in jeopardy the transactions required in the daily lives of Americans, from student loans to the operation of a small business.
Put another way, the moment required leadership, adult behavior, House members telling constituents something they didn't want to hear.
The political jockeying has been evident all along, in particular, John McCain rushing back to Washington and setting back delicate negotiations. Republicans wanted cover, and so did Democrats. Over the weekend, Henry Paulson, the treasury secretary, and congressional leaders from both parties surfaced to announce a compromise, an improvement of the initial plan put forward by the Bush White House.
How easy to complain about details. The overriding purpose of the bailout involves sending a decisive message about the willingness of Washington to take responsibility in a crisis. Marcy Kaptur, a Toledo Democrat, rose in opposition: ''Financial crimes have been committed. Now Congress is being asked to bail out the culprits.'' Truth be told, there are many to blame, even on Capitol Hill. Indictments of Wall Street tycoons? They may come later.
Even less helpful is Republican talk about the nation facing ''the slippery slope to socialism.'' Paulson? President Bush? Ben Bernanke, the Federal Reserve Board chairman? The words would be laughable, if the moment weren't so serious. Recall the practicality of Franklin Roosevelt. He didn't wreck capitalism. He came to the rescue. This situation isn't the Great Depression. Still, it is financially dangerous, requiring swift and dramatic action.
The House appeared ready to do its necessary part. Then, Betty Sutton, Marcy Kaptur, Steve LaTourette and others opted for further playing of the political angles. They took the cowardly way.
Betty Sutton proudly waved her opposition to the proposed $700 billion package designed to help restore stability to beleaguered financial markets. The Copley Township Democrat issued a statement cudgeling ''an arrogant and reckless Bush administration.'' She dismissed provisions designed to provide oversight and accountability as weak and ineffective. What Sutton really understood is that many Americans oppose the bailout, and she leaped to the front of the parade — along with a narrow majority of her colleagues, Republicans and Democrats, the House rejecting the bailout by a 228-205 vote.
A profile in courage? Hardly. The more difficult task involved explaining to those angry Americans (and who isn't furious?) that as unpalatable as the bailout is, the alternative is worse, credit markets freezing further, putting in jeopardy the transactions required in the daily lives of Americans, from student loans to the operation of a small business.
Put another way, the moment required leadership, adult behavior, House members telling constituents something they didn't want to hear.
The political jockeying has been evident all along, in particular, John McCain rushing back to Washington and setting back delicate negotiations. Republicans wanted cover, and so did Democrats. Over the weekend, Henry Paulson, the treasury secretary, and congressional leaders from both parties surfaced to announce a compromise, an improvement of the initial plan put forward by the Bush White House.
How easy to complain about details. The overriding purpose of the bailout involves sending a decisive message about the willingness of Washington to take responsibility in a crisis. Marcy Kaptur, a Toledo Democrat, rose in opposition: ''Financial crimes have been committed. Now Congress is being asked to bail out the culprits.'' Truth be told, there are many to blame, even on Capitol Hill. Indictments of Wall Street tycoons? They may come later.
Even less helpful is Republican talk about the nation facing ''the slippery slope to socialism.'' Paulson? President Bush? Ben Bernanke, the Federal Reserve Board chairman? The words would be laughable, if the moment weren't so serious. Recall the practicality of Franklin Roosevelt. He didn't wreck capitalism. He came to the rescue. This situation isn't the Great Depression. Still, it is financially dangerous, requiring swift and dramatic action.
The House appeared ready to do its necessary part. Then, Betty Sutton, Marcy Kaptur, Steve LaTourette and others opted for further playing of the political angles. They took the cowardly way.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
akron, oh
Posted 03:17 PM, 09/30/2008
Thank Newt too: http://thinkprogress.org/2008/09/30/gingrich-against-bailout/
