Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Police accuse bank robbery suspect of gobbling up note (with dashcam video)
Victim of beating in Kent last week is declared dead at Akron hospital
Akron man killed in crash on his street
Can DNA tests free ex-Akron captain?
Browns find another way to lose
Dad accused of forcing son into field, killing him
Blogs:
Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens
The Heldenfiles:
Sunday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Browns sick after sick loss in Detroit
Akron Zips:
Zips advance to Sweet Sixteen
Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster
Cleveland Browns:
Post-game defensive quotes
Kent State Sports:
Kent State defeats Rochester College, 63-44
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers
Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad
Varsity Letters:
Four area football teams play tonight
All Da King's Men:
The Sunday Sanity Challenge
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Will Health Care Reform Pass?
Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (70) Savings in Medicare Advantage
See Jane Style:
Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Faye Dunaway to be Evicted?
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Monique asks how to get tickets for the Polar Express.
Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – You are All Wrong About Jobs, or the Lack of Jobs, Being the Reason People Do Not Live in NEO
Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go
Looking for a reason to oppose state Issue 6?
Published on Monday, Oct 20, 2008
Weighing in last week was the Buckeye Institute for Public Policy Solutions, a conservative think tank based in Columbus. The institute's report was written by Jeffrey Hooke, a Virginia-based corporate finance consultant who has authored many studies on the economics of gambling.
Hooke's conclusion? Issue 6 amounts to a ''giveaway'' by Ohio taxpayers.
Passage of the amendment would grant a monopoly license to a few wealthy individuals from the Cleveland area and their partner, Lakes Entertainment, a Minnesota-based company that manages Indian casinos. The text of the amendment allows the state to set an initial licensing fee of as much as $15 million, but that amount is fully refundable.
Other states auction gambling licenses, in much the same way the federal government auctions permits for oil exploration. Such a license could be auctioned for $1 billion in cash, Hooke calculated, based on market demographics in the Wilmington area and the experiences of other states.
More, there is absolutely nothing in the amendment to prevent the gambling partnership MyOhioNow from immediately selling the license. No wonder MyOhioNow is willing to spend millions of dollars on television ads. The return would make a payday lender blush.
The other telling point in the Buckeye study is that estimates of casino income, jobs and tax revenue must be viewed in light of a limited amount of disposable income. Sure, some Ohioans going out of state to gamble will be lured back. What happens when residents who don't gamble now choose to spend time and money at the casino?
Hooke drives home the essential point that gambling doesn't create wealth. It just shifts wealth around. Many of the entertainment dollars dropped at the casino will be siphoned from the local economy, bowling alleys, movie houses and restaurants suffering. A decline in state lottery revenue will also result, based on the record in other states.
Vote No Casinos, an alliance concerned with the social effects of gambling, upped the ante last week by previewing its TV ad against Issue 6. The group also has prepared yard signs, campaign literature and a video in which Clinton County governmental, religious and business interests express their opposition.
Sen. George Voinovich, a strong opponent of previous gambling issues, stressed the devastating impact gambling has on families whose resources are drained away, forcing them to turn to social service agencies for help. Voinovich rightly described the $240 million that casino backers estimate will be generated by a 30 percent tax on gross receipts from gambling (an amount in no way guaranteed by the amendment) as little more than ''salt in the soup'' when distributed across 88 counties.
Voinovich asked: ''Why in the world would anyone want to amend the constitution and put a monopoly in . . . ?'' Great question.
Get the full article here.
