Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Police accuse bank robbery suspect of gobbling up note (with dashcam video)
Man found dead in North Akron home is identified
Dad accused of forcing son into field, killing him
NFL star Chris Spielman's wife loses cancer battle
Coventry man killed in crash at I-77 ramp
College student mistaken for deer, shot to death
Man allegedly paid teens to spit in his face
Retired firefighter who broke color barrier among those being honored
Angel Food Ministries helps stretch grocery dollars
Blogs:
Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Night Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
For your Saturday entertainment …
Akron Zips:
Two blowouts, one night
Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster
Cleveland Browns:
Holmgren expresses interest in Browns position
Kent State Sports:
Singletary update
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Indiana Pacers – Here’s to LBJ and Free Throws
Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad
Varsity Letters:
Bowling season starts today
All Da King's Men:
Headed For Disaster
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Akron Law Café:
Federal Judge Declares DOMA Unconstitutional
See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic
Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Silverdome Potentially SOLD!
Ohio Travels with Betty:
George is looking for a Thanksgiving buffet in Akron.
Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall
HRLite House:
Colloquium at University of Akron
Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go
Why property values decline, and property taxes still go up
Published on Tuesday, Mar 24, 2009
What's driving the numbers? As reported Sunday by Beacon Journal staff writer Rick Armon, the foreclosure crisis, a sour economy and a fear of higher taxes are all factors. ''This is a scandal,'' Tom Lucien, an employed factory worker, told Armon, pointing to an increased value for commercial property he owns near the University of Akron.
Although the frustration is understandable, the cutoff point for reappraisals was at the end of 2007, excluding the difficult economic trends of the past year. More, the state won't allow counties to include sale prices of foreclosed homes in their calculations. That dramatically alters the picture in Summit County, hit hard by foreclosures.
At this point, the fury appears largely about higher tax bills. When new valuations were announced last year, residential values in the county down roughly 1 percent, reaction was muted. When John Donofrio, the county fiscal officer, went on a ''road show'' with the new values last year, about half the number of property owners showed up as six years ago.
What's more, a decrease in valuation does not necessarily translate into a decrease in property taxes, as residential and commercial owners learned this year. In Barberton, for example, residential property values fell 3.2 percent, but that was more than offset by tax increases, mainly a school bond issue and an increase for the Alcohol, Drug Addiction and Mental Health Services board.
The owner of a home with a market value of $100,000 before reappraisal would still pay almost $30 a year more in property taxes even if his or her home decreased in value by 14 percent.
Tom Lucien and others find themselves not so much in a scandal as in the midst of a complicated process that must be performed according to strict state standards. If the past is a guideline, most appeals will result in no changes. The county would do well to add a second board to handle the volume. Beyond that, there isn't much wiggle room.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
