Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Not 101 Dalmations…but close!

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
Saturday entertainment, one more time …

Akron Zips:
No. 1 UA soccer remains perfect, Zips football defeats rival Flashes

Tribe Matters:
Tribe makes roster moves

Cleveland Browns:
Lewis doesn't like boycott

Kent State Sports:
Kent State falls to Akron, 20-28

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Knicks

Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.

Varsity Letters:
Wrestling, bowling teams prepare for season

All Da King's Men:
Bigger And Better Boondoggles

Blog of Mass Destruction:
The Shooter

Akron Law Café:
NEW U.S. Supreme Court Database

See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler

Car Chase:
Perfect Weather for an Autumn Drive

Let's Talk Real Estate:
RUMORS: Downtown Restaurant Explosion

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.

Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27

HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio

Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record

What's behind the curtain?

The governor's private calculations for public schools

From the moment Ted Strickland went public with a school-funding plan, practically everyone recognized the basis for the budget allocations needed revision. Questions abounded: Why, for example, would some wealthy districts receive more state money than much poorer ones? How were the costs calculated for components of the key funding factor, the Instructional Quality Index?

The governor now has set in motion the inevitable revisions. Yet his process invites doubts about the fundamental issue of transparency.

An ''evidence-based model'' should present clearly and fully the evidence supporting the funding decisions for districts. Such clarity and openness would dispel any suspicion the governor is fudging, say, in computing teacher salaries, to fit budget constraints.

With that in mind, it is disturbing to learn that a private consulting firm is heavily engaged in the plan revisions. Ordinarily, the job would go to the state Department of Education. A key difference? The department is obligated to make its records public. The private consulting firm is not.

According to the Associated Press, the firm, Driscoll & Fleeter, under contract with the Education Tax Policy Institute, which does research for the Ohio School Boards Association, is sharing its work with the governor's staff and legislators. The concern is that by relying on a private firm, the governor has abandoned transparency. What's wrong with a complete public airing of the numbers and assumptions?

From the moment Ted Strickland went public with a school-funding plan, practically everyone recognized the basis for the budget allocations needed revision. Questions abounded: Why, for example, would some wealthy districts receive more state money than much poorer ones? How were the costs calculated for components of the key funding factor, the Instructional Quality Index?

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


peter
stow, oh

Posted 06:48 AM, 03/27/2009

"What's wrong with a complete public airing of the numbers and assumptions?"

The more of the details that are known of Gov. Strickland's tax increasing education 'reform' plan, the quicker and stronger the resistence to it will be.
















Most Commented Stories