Container Top
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


First Bell - On Education:
No City of Akron basketball tonight

Pets:
Pet telethon re-airs

The Heldenfiles:
Chipmunks "Squeakquel" on DVD/BD March 30

Akron Zips:
Late surge gives Zips ugly road win

Tribe Matters:
Blogmail response on Hafner

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth's contract terminated

Balanced Ledger:
QB in Browns future: another mock draft

Kent State Sports:
KSU Notes – February 9

Cleveland Cavaliers:
NBA Power Rankings from Around the Internet

Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes grab 18 players on signing day

Varsity Letters:
Five local gridders to play in Big33

All Da King's Men:
Palin At The Tea Party Convention

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Republican Pre-Conditions

Akron Law Café:
Law, Love and Chocolate

Car Chase:
Collector Car Hobby Loses One of the Best—Jim Roll

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Decisions Decisions: Credit Cards or Your Mortgage?

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Loucile is looking for a Lake Erie getaway in June for three kids, ages 1, 3, and 5.

Sound Check:
Talk of the Town – Top entertainment picks for the weekend

HRLite House:
OFCCP Report

Akron Gamer:
Makers of 'Castle Crashers' unveil 'BattleBlock Theater'

See Jane Style:
Do IT this week: Layering

What's behind the curtain?

The governor's private calculations for public schools

From the moment Ted Strickland went public with a school-funding plan, practically everyone recognized the basis for the budget allocations needed revision. Questions abounded: Why, for example, would some wealthy districts receive more state money than much poorer ones? How were the costs calculated for components of the key funding factor, the Instructional Quality Index?

The governor now has set in motion the inevitable revisions. Yet his process invites doubts about the fundamental issue of transparency.

An ''evidence-based model'' should present clearly and fully the evidence supporting the funding decisions for districts. Such clarity and openness would dispel any suspicion the governor is fudging, say, in computing teacher salaries, to fit budget constraints.

With that in mind, it is disturbing to learn that a private consulting firm is heavily engaged in the plan revisions. Ordinarily, the job would go to the state Department of Education. A key difference? The department is obligated to make its records public. The private consulting firm is not.

According to the Associated Press, the firm, Driscoll & Fleeter, under contract with the Education Tax Policy Institute, which does research for the Ohio School Boards Association, is sharing its work with the governor's staff and legislators. The concern is that by relying on a private firm, the governor has abandoned transparency. What's wrong with a complete public airing of the numbers and assumptions?

From the moment Ted Strickland went public with a school-funding plan, practically everyone recognized the basis for the budget allocations needed revision. Questions abounded: Why, for example, would some wealthy districts receive more state money than much poorer ones? How were the costs calculated for components of the key funding factor, the Instructional Quality Index?

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


peter
stow, oh

Posted 06:48 AM, 03/27/2009

"What's wrong with a complete public airing of the numbers and assumptions?"

The more of the details that are known of Gov. Strickland's tax increasing education 'reform' plan, the quicker and stronger the resistence to it will be.














Most Commented Stories