Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Not 101 Dalmations…but close!

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
For your perusal

Akron Zips:
The morning after

Tribe Matters:
Tribe makes roster moves

Cleveland Browns:
Lewis doesn't like boycott

Kent State Sports:
Kent State falls to Akron, 20-28

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Knicks

Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.

Varsity Letters:
Wrestling, bowling teams prepare for season

All Da King's Men:
If It Looks Like Islamic Terrorism…

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Dems Message To Women: Don't Enjoy The Sex

Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (62) The Stupak Amendment

See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler

Car Chase:
Perfect Weather for an Autumn Drive

Let's Talk Real Estate:
RUMORS: Downtown Restaurant Explosion

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.

Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27

HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio

Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record

Vulnerable Barberton

A responsible plan to protect the city's housing stock

Since early this year, Mayor Bob Genet has pursued the reasonable goal of having landlords in Barberton (himself included) register and pay a modest annual fee. A similar program has operated in Akron the past 13 years. Genet rightly fears that foreclosures, falling housing prices and low interest rates easily can create avenues for unscrupulous operators. Just look at Cleveland. Once the rot starts in a neighborhood, it is hard to stop.

In Barberton, the vulnerability is widespread. About one-third of the city's housing stock is rental, some 3,000 units. After much discussion, the City Council is set for a final vote June 8 on a measure that would require a $40 per unit, per year registration fee. Genet would earmark the funds for neighborhood improvements, including the acquisition and demolition of dilapidated structures. Landlords have been part of the discussion from the beginning, but they are not happy.

Genet is well aware the $40 fee is higher than Akron's $15. The Akron ordinance gradually lowers the per-unit cost for those who own multiple units, an idea Genet initially embraced. But the Barberton council thought otherwise, objecting to giving large landlords a break over those owning just a few units. As it is, Barberton would provide a substantial reward for responsible behavior. After three years with no violations, the fee would drop to $20 per unit.

The plan hardly amounts to a crushing burden, or, as some landlords charge, evidence of greedy city leaders looking to boost revenues. At the top rate of $40 per unit, and assuming 100 percent participation, $120,000 a year would be generated. Genet realistically expects about $100,000 for neighborhood revitalization projects, far from a windfall and a figure that would presumably drop after three years, if landlords maintain their rental properties.

Taking steps to stabilize neighborhoods in the current economic climate is a necessary move for the city. In the end, all property owners will benefit, with landlords better able to market their units, and potentially increase their profits.

Since early this year, Mayor Bob Genet has pursued the reasonable goal of having landlords in Barberton (himself included) register and pay a modest annual fee. A similar program has operated in Akron the past 13 years. Genet rightly fears that foreclosures, falling housing prices and low interest rates easily can create avenues for unscrupulous operators. Just look at Cleveland. Once the rot starts in a neighborhood, it is hard to stop.

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories