Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Family found dead in Ohio home
Robbers order bar patrons to empty pockets
Man gets 3 years in prison for having sex with horse
Sex-toy study at Duke University raises some eyebrows
Akron man turns himself in after authorities turn up heat
Get ready for detour, delays on Route 8
Man appears alive at own funeral
Blogs:
Pets:
Not 101 Dalmations…but close!
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Saturday entertainment, one more time …
Akron Zips:
No. 1 UA soccer remains perfect, Zips football defeats rival Flashes
Tribe Matters:
Tribe makes roster moves
Cleveland Browns:
Lewis doesn't like boycott
Kent State Sports:
Kent State falls to Akron, 20-28
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Knicks
Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.
Varsity Letters:
Wrestling, bowling teams prepare for season
All Da King's Men:
Bigger And Better Boondoggles
Blog of Mass Destruction:
The Shooter
Akron Law Café:
NEW U.S. Supreme Court Database
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Perfect Weather for an Autumn Drive
Let's Talk Real Estate:
RUMORS: Downtown Restaurant Explosion
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record
State officials suddenly want a constitutional change for agribusiness
Published on Wednesday, Jun 24, 2009
The livestock issue is anything but simple. Proponents, among them Gov. Ted Strickland and legislative leaders of both parties, suddenly have elevated the creation of an Ohio Livestock Standards Board to a top priority, citing food safety concerns. In the Senate, Bob Gibbs, a Lakeville Republican, noted last week's recall of tainted cookie dough. The connection appeared strained.
More telling is a July 1 deadline for putting constitutional amendments before the voters in November, which the legislature can accomplish with a three-fifths majority in each house. Opponents, such as Dean Vickers of the state Humane Society, say the amendment would pre-empt an initiated statute his group would like to place on the ballot next year.
The Humane Society wants to phase out methods that immobilize animals such as hens, sows and calves in what it considers cruel conditions. He rightly fears the composition of the 13-member livestock board, with one practicing veterinarian and one member of a county humane society, would tilt in the direction large-scale farming operations. Vickers is threatening a competing ballot issue this fall.
Whatever problems exist in the food chain, Ohio is not having a food safety crisis. Thus, there is no compelling need to use the state constitution to enshrine quickly the composition and scope of a new state board, no matter how promising. The interests of the Humane Society must be balanced carefully against the economic impact on Ohio's farmers and limited to issues directly related to food safety.
That's a discussion that should take place in the legislature, with plenty of hearings and expert testimony. Any new layer of oversight should be passed as a statute, subject to later adjustment if needed.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
U, OH
Posted 10:06 AM, 06/24/2009
If you love animals, pay attention to this ''livestock committee.'' Ohio doesn't need an agricultural advisory board b/c they won't care about the needs of factory farmed animals living in cramped conditions. Contact your legislators & say NO to ''Big Agribusiness'' & this bad livestock advisory board.
