Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Family found dead in Ohio home
Robbers order bar patrons to empty pockets
Man gets 3 years in prison for having sex with horse
Sex-toy study at Duke University raises some eyebrows
Akron man turns himself in after authorities turn up heat
Get ready for detour, delays on Route 8
Man appears alive at own funeral
Blogs:
Pets:
Not 101 Dalmations…but close!
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
An agent's tale
Akron Zips:
No. 1 UA soccer remains perfect, Zips football defeats rival Flashes
Tribe Matters:
Tribe makes roster moves
Cleveland Browns:
Lewis doesn't like boycott
Kent State Sports:
Kent State falls to Akron, 20-28
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Knicks
Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.
Varsity Letters:
Wrestling, bowling teams prepare for season
All Da King's Men:
Bigger And Better Boondoggles
Blog of Mass Destruction:
The Shooter
Akron Law Café:
NEW U.S. Supreme Court Database
See Jane Style:
Muffle Your Muffler
Car Chase:
Perfect Weather for an Autumn Drive
Let's Talk Real Estate:
RUMORS: Downtown Restaurant Explosion
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record
A critical provision of the Voting Rights Act survives the Supreme Court
Published on Wednesday, Jun 24, 2009
An 8-1 majority granted relief to the utility district, but it did so narrowly. It limited the option to small jurisdictions that do not handle their own voter registration. That amounts to a qualified victory for those concerned about the court acting hastily to remove a key tool in protecting civil rights, especially in view of the coming Census and the redrawing of congressional and legislative districts.
Of worry was the tone of the majority opinion written by Chief Justice John Roberts. He made much of the ''historic accomplishments'' under the Voting Rights Act. He stressed that ''things have changed in the South.'' He highlighted the strides in voter turnout and registration, plus the ''unprecedented levels'' of elected minority officeholders.
All of that is true, and well worth applauding. At the same time, a court majority looking for another opportunity to ease further or remove the requirement of Section 5 should keep in mind the wealth of information gathered by Congress as recently as 2006 when lawmakers overwhelmingly voted to reauthorize the provision. Lawmakers didn't act without reason or in a heavy-handed way. They recognized how precious the achievements have been, and how important it is to ensure they are secure.
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
