Container Top
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


First Bell - On Education:
No City of Akron basketball tonight

Pets:
Pet telethon re-airs

The Heldenfiles:
Chipmunks "Squeakquel" on DVD/BD March 30

Akron Zips:
Late surge gives Zips ugly road win

Tribe Matters:
Blogmail response on Hafner

Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth's contract terminated

Balanced Ledger:
QB in Browns future: another mock draft

Kent State Sports:
KSU Notes – February 9

Cleveland Cavaliers:
NBA Power Rankings from Around the Internet

Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes grab 18 players on signing day

Varsity Letters:
Garfield at Buchtel basketball

All Da King's Men:
Palin At The Tea Party Convention

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Republican Pre-Conditions

Akron Law Café:
Car Chase:
Collector Car Hobby Loses One of the Best—Jim Roll

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Decisions Decisions: Credit Cards or Your Mortgage?

Ohio Travels with Betty:
Loucile is looking for a Lake Erie getaway in June for three kids, ages 1, 3, and 5.

Sound Check:
Talk of the Town – Top entertainment picks for the weekend

HRLite House:
Track HR Research

Akron Gamer:
'Tecmo Bowl' recreation of Super Bowl XLIV

See Jane Style:
Do IT this week: Layering

Election fallout

Ohio voters say yes to casino gambling. Now lawmakers must look at getting the state a better deal

Dan Gilbert and his partners at Penn National Gaming knew exactly what they were doing. They crafted a casino gambling proposal that played to voters desiring job creation and economic development in urban cores. Then, they pressed the message relentlessly, easily outpacing the money spent by the presidential campaigns in the state last year. Is there an Ohioan who hasn't heard the pledge of 34,000 jobs and keeping the money here?

Look at the dramatic swings in voting, county by county. Ohio voters firmly rejected a casino gambling proposal in 2008, as they had three previous times. On Tuesday, huge percentages of voters shifted from ''no'' to ''yes'' in the space of a year. In 38 counties, the variance amounted to 15 percentage points or more. Twelve counties experienced a swing of 20 percentage points or more: Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, Erie, Geauga, Hamilton, Lake, Lorain, Lucas, Medina, Ottawa, Portage and Summit.

Note the geography, the dozen counties located near three of the proposed sites for the casinos, Cleveland, Cincinnati and Toledo. A fourth casino is slated for Columbus, where a strong majority of voters rejected the proposal.

Gilbert, the owner of the Cleveland Cavaliers and chairman of Quicken Loans, deserves credit, along with his casino allies, for a smart campaign. They also benefited from the timing, Ohio suffering from the harsh recession, especially because the state never recovered from the downturn early in the decade.

The campaign issued a statement following the triumph of state Issue 3, declaring Ohioans ''the winners'' and pledging to keep the promises made in the campaign. The Ohio Jobs and Growth Committee (the slick name donned by supporters) expressed its eagerness to work with state lawmakers to implement the casino proposal.

The hope is, casino supporters will find enough lawmakers willing to scrutinize closely the arrangement. No matter how shrewd and fortunate the campaign, the outcome shouldn't obscure the hard truth uttered by opponents. This is a sweet deal for Gilbert and Penn National Gaming. For all the talk about jobs, development and public revenue, the riches flow largely to the house. More, gambling doesn't generate wealth in a substantial way. Consumer spending merely shifts from local bars, restaurants and businesses to the casinos. Then, there are the lives and families battered when addiction grips.

On Wednesday, state Rep. Clyde Evans leaped to push the idea of an amendment to the amendment, the casino plan having taken the form of a state constitutional amendment, making repeal or changes all the more difficult to achieve. The Rio Grande Republican has mind such steps as increasing the state's take from 33 percent to 60 percent, adding competitive bidding to the selection of casino managers, even suspending the locations of the casinos. Not surprisingly, he wants to redirect the public revenues from local governments (mostly) to state coffers.

You don't have to agree entirely with Evans on the details to recognize the value in his approach, lawmakers working to strike a better balance, asking voters for their approval next year. Yes, casino gambling now has a place in Ohio's future. That doesn't mean the state must play the chump.

Dan Gilbert and his partners at Penn National Gaming knew exactly what they were doing. They crafted a casino gambling proposal that played to voters desiring job creation and economic development in urban cores. Then, they pressed the message relentlessly, easily outpacing the money spent by the presidential campaigns in the state last year. Is there an Ohioan who hasn't heard the pledge of 34,000 jobs and keeping the money here?

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button


Watching in Summit County
akron , oh

Posted 07:58 AM, 11/05/2009

the voters have spoken. you lost get over it.


True Facts
Copley, OH

Posted 11:02 AM, 11/05/2009

Oh no, we are screwed. People who like to gamble out of state now can go to casinos in Ohio.

Sounds like a horrible plan. We might even get some tourists to come into our state. Absolutely horrible idea.

Nobody was coming here for the lotto and bingo, which is gambling anyway. Casinos will bring people here and these people will help the local economies.














Most Commented Stories