Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Man robbed at Tallmadge Avenue eatery
Four teens restrain man, take items from his Akron home
Police: Ohio girl dies after fall into snow bank
Complaints against officer keep coming
Another winter punch heading toward Ohio
Cuyahoga Falls residents come home to find burning couch on balcony
Blogs:
First Bell - On Education:
No City of Akron basketball tonight
Pets:
Pet telethon re-airs
The Heldenfiles:
Chipmunks "Squeakquel" on DVD/BD March 30
Akron Zips:
Late surge gives Zips ugly road win
Tribe Matters:
Blogmail response on Hafner
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth's contract terminated
Balanced Ledger:
QB in Browns future: another mock draft
Kent State Sports:
KSU Notes – February 9
Cleveland Cavaliers:
NBA Power Rankings from Around the Internet
Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes grab 18 players on signing day
Varsity Letters:
Garfield at Buchtel basketball
All Da King's Men:
Palin At The Tea Party Convention
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Republican Pre-Conditions
Akron Law Café:
Car Chase:
Collector Car Hobby Loses One of the Best—Jim Roll
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Decisions Decisions: Credit Cards or Your Mortgage?
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Loucile is looking for a Lake Erie getaway in June for three kids, ages 1, 3, and 5.
Sound Check:
Talk of the Town – Top entertainment picks for the weekend
HRLite House:
Track HR Research
Akron Gamer:
'Tecmo Bowl' recreation of Super Bowl XLIV
See Jane Style:
Do IT this week: Layering
Ohio voters say yes to casino gambling. Now lawmakers must look at getting the state a better deal
Published on Thursday, Nov 05, 2009
Look at the dramatic swings in voting, county by county. Ohio voters firmly rejected a casino gambling proposal in 2008, as they had three previous times. On Tuesday, huge percentages of voters shifted from ''no'' to ''yes'' in the space of a year. In 38 counties, the variance amounted to 15 percentage points or more. Twelve counties experienced a swing of 20 percentage points or more: Ashtabula, Cuyahoga, Erie, Geauga, Hamilton, Lake, Lorain, Lucas, Medina, Ottawa, Portage and Summit.
Note the geography, the dozen counties located near three of the proposed sites for the casinos, Cleveland, Cincinnati and Toledo. A fourth casino is slated for Columbus, where a strong majority of voters rejected the proposal.
Gilbert, the owner of the Cleveland Cavaliers and chairman of Quicken Loans, deserves credit, along with his casino allies, for a smart campaign. They also benefited from the timing, Ohio suffering from the harsh recession, especially because the state never recovered from the downturn early in the decade.
The campaign issued a statement following the triumph of state Issue 3, declaring Ohioans ''the winners'' and pledging to keep the promises made in the campaign. The Ohio Jobs and Growth Committee (the slick name donned by supporters) expressed its eagerness to work with state lawmakers to implement the casino proposal.
The hope is, casino supporters will find enough lawmakers willing to scrutinize closely the arrangement. No matter how shrewd and fortunate the campaign, the outcome shouldn't obscure the hard truth uttered by opponents. This is a sweet deal for Gilbert and Penn National Gaming. For all the talk about jobs, development and public revenue, the riches flow largely to the house. More, gambling doesn't generate wealth in a substantial way. Consumer spending merely shifts from local bars, restaurants and businesses to the casinos. Then, there are the lives and families battered when addiction grips.
On Wednesday, state Rep. Clyde Evans leaped to push the idea of an amendment to the amendment, the casino plan having taken the form of a state constitutional amendment, making repeal or changes all the more difficult to achieve. The Rio Grande Republican has mind such steps as increasing the state's take from 33 percent to 60 percent, adding competitive bidding to the selection of casino managers, even suspending the locations of the casinos. Not surprisingly, he wants to redirect the public revenues from local governments (mostly) to state coffers.
You don't have to agree entirely with Evans on the details to recognize the value in his approach, lawmakers working to strike a better balance, asking voters for their approval next year. Yes, casino gambling now has a place in Ohio's future. That doesn't mean the state must play the chump.
Get the full article here.
the voters have spoken. you lost get over it.
Oh no, we are screwed. People who like to gamble out of state now can go to casinos in Ohio.
Sounds like a horrible plan. We might even get some tourists to come into our state. Absolutely horrible idea.
Nobody was coming here for the lotto and bingo, which is gambling anyway. Casinos will bring people here and these people will help the local economies.
