Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Night Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
For your Saturday entertainment …

Akron Zips:
Two blowouts, one night

Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster

Cleveland Browns:
Hey, somebody's gotta stick up for the Browns

Kent State Sports:
Singletary update

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Indiana Pacers – Here’s to LBJ and Free Throws

Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad

Varsity Letters:
Bowling season starts today

All Da King's Men:
Headed For Disaster

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Will Health Care Reform Pass?

Akron Law Café:
Federal Judge Declares DOMA Unconstitutional

See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic

Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Silverdome Potentially SOLD!

Ohio Travels with Betty:
George is looking for a Thanksgiving buffet in Akron.

Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall

HRLite House:
Colloquium at University of Akron

Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go

Protection money

Congress and the White House make a bipartisan down payment on the necessary task of restoring the Great Lakes

Barack Obama pledged during the presidential campaign, and once he arrived in the Oval Office, to invest heavily in the restoration of the Great Lakes. Now he has delivered, signing legislation last week that almost doubles federal funding for the worthy cause. The moment hardly won much attention. Still, the investment amounts to signal advance for the larger region and the country.

The Great Lakes are a national treasure. They also are an indispensable economic driver for Ohio and other states along the shorelines. Credit goes to members of the local congressional delegation for pushing hard to secure the money — Sen. George Voinovich, Sen. Sherrod Brown and House members Betty Sutton, Steve LaTourette and Tim Ryan. Here is a refreshing episode of bipartisanship at work.

For the past four years, a comprehensive plan to protect and restore the Great Lakes has been on the shelf in Congress. Its price tag? Roughly $26 billion. Candidate Obama talked about a $5 billion investment. Now, in the first year of his presidency, he has obtained an initial $475 million.

The sum is a fraction of the need. Still, Congress is looking at the Great Lakes in much the way lawmakers devoted substantial resources to rehabilitate the Everglades in Florida. Put another way, the funding in hand must be spent effectively, making the case that additional money will be well deployed.

The priorities are many, from habitat restoration of the Ashtabula River to slowing polluted runoff from farms and industry. The removal of the Ballville Dam in Freemont would restore flow to the Sandusky River improving the fish spawning habitat.

The western Lake Erie basin increasingly suffers from harmful algal blooms threatening water quality and fisheries, evoking the troubling days of the 1960s and '70s. Steps must be taken to clean toxic sediment from such places as the lower Cuyahoga River, and efforts must focus on thwarting invasive species, for instance, zebra mussels and Asian carp, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently pointing to Ashtabula, Sandusky and Toledo as points of entry posing the greatest risk.

With all this and more in mind, Ohio must take sound steps to ensure that it has a clear, comprehensive and inclusive approach to defining its needs, establishing a strong position to attract federal grants. Ohio doesn't want to invite the impression of a state with quarreling interest groups. Know the stakes. The Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank, has calculated that every dollar in restoration money will generate an additional dollar in benefits for the region — in jobs, income and quality of life. That's a return the state doesn't want to miss.

Barack Obama pledged during the presidential campaign, and once he arrived in the Oval Office, to invest heavily in the restoration of the Great Lakes. Now he has delivered, signing legislation last week that almost doubles federal funding for the worthy cause. The moment hardly won much attention. Still, the investment amounts to signal advance for the larger region and the country.

The Great Lakes are a national treasure. They also are an indispensable economic driver for Ohio and other states along the shorelines. Credit goes to members of the local congressional delegation for pushing hard to secure the money — Sen. George Voinovich, Sen. Sherrod Brown and House members Betty Sutton, Steve LaTourette and Tim Ryan. Here is a refreshing episode of bipartisanship at work.

For the past four years, a comprehensive plan to protect and restore the Great Lakes has been on the shelf in Congress. Its price tag? Roughly $26 billion. Candidate Obama talked about a $5 billion investment. Now, in the first year of his presidency, he has obtained an initial $475 million.

The sum is a fraction of the need. Still, Congress is looking at the Great Lakes in much the way lawmakers devoted substantial resources to rehabilitate the Everglades in Florida. Put another way, the funding in hand must be spent effectively, making the case that additional money will be well deployed.

The priorities are many, from habitat restoration of the Ashtabula River to slowing polluted runoff from farms and industry. The removal of the Ballville Dam in Freemont would restore flow to the Sandusky River improving the fish spawning habitat.

The western Lake Erie basin increasingly suffers from harmful algal blooms threatening water quality and fisheries, evoking the troubling days of the 1960s and '70s. Steps must be taken to clean toxic sediment from such places as the lower Cuyahoga River, and efforts must focus on thwarting invasive species, for instance, zebra mussels and Asian carp, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently pointing to Ashtabula, Sandusky and Toledo as points of entry posing the greatest risk.

With all this and more in mind, Ohio must take sound steps to ensure that it has a clear, comprehensive and inclusive approach to defining its needs, establishing a strong position to attract federal grants. Ohio doesn't want to invite the impression of a state with quarreling interest groups. Know the stakes. The Brookings Institution, a Washington think tank, has calculated that every dollar in restoration money will generate an additional dollar in benefits for the region — in jobs, income and quality of life. That's a return the state doesn't want to miss.



Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories