Container Top
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Akron Docs in Haiti:
Almost home

First Bell - On Education:
Strange, sad story from Canton

Pets:
Found: White Eskimo male dog near Bath and State Rd.

The Heldenfiles:
Fess Parker, R.I.P.

Akron Zips:
Looking back on the season

Tribe Matters:
Cabrera says it’s time to play

Cleveland Browns:
Yates latest to re-sign

Balanced Ledger:
How times have changed?

Kent State Sports:
Kent State gears up for WNIT at Michigan

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Highlights from Wednesday’s Cavs-Pacers Game

Buckeye Blogging:
Bucks High Seed – Turner High Praise

Varsity Letters:
DII state semifinal: Walsh Jesuit loses to Hathaway Brown 53-48

All Da King's Men:
ObamaCare To Reduce Premiums By 3000% ?

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Why Republicans Are Acting So Crazy

Akron Law Café:
Does Capitalism Inspire "Moral Flexibility"?

Car Chase:
2010 CONCOURS SEASON IS UPON US

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Deals in Miami?!.

Sound Check:
Willie Nelson & Family coming to the Akron Civic Theatre May 11

See Jane Style:
Who Wore What – The Oscars

HRLite House:
Horses of Courses

Akron Gamer:
PlayStation's Move ups the interaction, fidelity

Protect the Fed

A House committee looks at weakening the Federal Reserve. That wouldn't be good for the central bank or the economy

Published on Friday, Nov 27, 2009

In 2008, Ron Paul sought the Republican presidential nomination with a libertarian message. He advocated, among other things, the elimination of the Federal Reserve Board. After his unsuccessful run, Paul returned to the U.S. House, where he represents part of Texas, and now, in the wake of the Wall Street debacle and rising economic populism, he has advanced toward the dangerous goal of reducing the authority of the Fed.

The House Financial Services Committee, as part of its effort to overhaul financial regulation, has approved a Paul-inspired provision that would allow Congress to order audits of all the Fed's lending programs, plus its decisions to set monetary policy by raising or lowering interest rates. The Government Accountability Office would conduct the assessments. Paul touts the value of bringing greater transparency to Fed operations.

What's so troubling?

A cornerstone of the Fed since its creation a century ago has been its independence. Expose the bank to political pressure, and its credibility would be threatened. Investors would be uncertain about its capacity for tough decisions such as raising interest rates to combat inflation. Analysts warn that even hints about higher interest rates would trigger requests from lawmakers seeking political leverage.

Recall the important decision-making of Paul Volcker, late in the Jimmy Carter years and into the presidency of Ronald Reagan. As the Fed chairman, Volcker understood the pain that would result from wringing double-digit inflation out of the economy. His independence helped immeasurably in allowing him to do what was right for the country.

Much of the fury now directed at the Fed stems from the failure of Alan Greenspan, a former chairman, and Ben Bernanke, the current chairman, to see the looming financial crackup. They were not alone. Choices by Congress and the White House, Democrats and Republicans, aided the mess. (That said, Bernanke deserves high marks for responding aggressively and effectively when he did act.)

So, yes, a revamping of financial regulations is required, updating systems to match the sophistication of new investment tools. The Financial Services Committee has put forward promising proposals, including an agency dedicated to consumer financial protection. It also has much still to accomplish, the House looking to vote on a complete bill next month. Most notably, the legislation must prove aggressive enough in regulating derivatives, the vehicles for speculation, the prime culprits in the collapse.

Paul Volcker persuasively argues for a new version of the Glass-Steagall Act, approved in 1933 and revoked in 1999, restoring the separation between commercial and investment banking. That would be a fitting response to the populist anger. Undermining the independence of the Federal Reserve is not.

In 2008, Ron Paul sought the Republican presidential nomination with a libertarian message. He advocated, among other things, the elimination of the Federal Reserve Board. After his unsuccessful run, Paul returned to the U.S. House, where he represents part of Texas, and now, in the wake of the Wall Street debacle and rising economic populism, he has advanced toward the dangerous goal of reducing the authority of the Fed.

Get the full article here.



Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button

nmaxxs
Memory Alpha, OH

Posted 08:58 AM, 11/27/2009

How is knowing what the Fed is doing with our money taking away their independence?

Oh, because they may being doing some things that are questionable, even damaging?


ghettodweller
akron, oh

Posted 10:58 PM, 11/28/2009

@nmaxxs, That would be applicable to the City of Akron also. No transparency for Akron because they may be doing somethings that are questionable, even damaging!














Most Commented Stories