Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Family found dead in Ohio home
Robbers order bar patrons to empty pockets
Man gets 3 years in prison for having sex with horse
Sex-toy study at Duke University raises some eyebrows
Akron man turns himself in after authorities turn up heat
Get ready for detour, delays on Route 8
Man appears alive at own funeral
Blogs:
Pets:
Not 101 Dalmations…but close!
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
Saturday entertainment, one more time …
Akron Zips:
No. 1 UA soccer remains perfect, Zips football defeats rival Flashes
Tribe Matters:
Tribe makes roster moves
Cleveland Browns:
Lewis doesn't like boycott
Kent State Sports:
Kent State falls to Akron, 20-28
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Knicks
Buckeye Blogging:
Weekly ‘B’ Deck Report – New Mexico St.
Varsity Letters:
Wrestling, bowling teams prepare for season
All Da King's Men:
Bigger And Better Boondoggles
Blog of Mass Destruction:
The Shooter
Akron Law Café:
See Jane Style:
Car Chase:
Perfect Weather for an Autumn Drive
Let's Talk Real Estate:
RUMORS: Downtown Restaurant Explosion
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jack is looking for a trip to Southern Ohio the week of November 16.
Sound Check:
The Black Keys to perform benefit concert at Musica on November 27
HRLite House:
Personal Rant – Why People Do Not Live in Northeast Ohio
Akron Gamer:
New 'Call of Duty' could set entertainment record
Published on Thursday, Apr 03, 2008
As law director for the city of Akron, I think it is important that I clarify for our citizens a city ordinance concerning campaign contribution limits that, on occasion, receives attention in news stories in the Beacon Journal.
Most of the time, the impression left by these accounts is, in my opinion, misleading.
There is no gray area in this; nothing is left open for interpretation, and the ordinance has passed muster in U.S. District Court.
Further, this law has been in effect in Akron since Jan. 24, 2003. Yet, the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) continues to complain that candidates, including Mayor Don Plusquellic, are not following the law.
This statement, as it concerns Plusquellic, is untrue and irresponsible.
The law at issue pertains to how much money candidates for city offices can raise for their campaign from individual donors.
On March 14, the Beacon Journal published an article (''Group protests mayor's election funds'') concerning the fund raising of Plusquellic for his 2007 primary campaign and his general election campaign. Some of what the article should have included and explained are:
Section 30.11 in our Code of Ordinances, which reads:
''CONTRIBUTION LIMITS
(C) No candidate for Mayor shall accept aggregate contributions per election from an individual person, political party, campaign committee, political action committee or political contributing entity in excess of $300.''
Most important to this article would have been to underscore Section 30.10 (f) dealing with the definition of the word ''election.'' The law clearly reads that fund raising within the limits specified above is legal in each election: primary and general.
Section 30.10 reads in part:
'' 'Per Election' means for each general election, primary election, special election, and/or runoff election in which a candidate's name appears on the ballot or in which the candidate has filed at the Summit County Board of Elections a declaration of intent to run as a write-in candidate.''
Mayor Plusquellic was clearly a candidate in the primary election and in the general election. The law allows him to accept contributions of $300 for the primary election and $300 for the general election.
For the AFSC to continually assert that this is not permitted under the law is patently wrong, and to continue to report these unfounded statements is irresponsible on the part of the newspaper.
Max Rothal
Akron
Cleaner air
at what cost?
I heard recently that the Environmental Protection Agency wants to change the formulation of our gasoline to make it ''cleaner.''
Do I have to even spend five minutes imagining what that would do to the price of gasoline?
We have just struggled with $3.49 a gallon for gasoline. What would we do if it suddenly shot to more than $4? The entire area would come to a shuddering halt, and the price of everything else would shoot straight through the roof. I can imagine the freeways becoming busy with people leaving the area for good.
The air would become cleaner, yes, but only because nobody would be left to pollute it. Or is that what the EPA is after, an empty Northeast Ohio?
Hello, EPA, the pollution you are finding was made in China, not here in good ol' Northeast Ohio.
Jenny Ray
Barberton
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
