Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Man found dead in North Akron home is identified
NFL star Chris Spielman's wife loses cancer battle
Poor machine maintenance blamed for fire at Akron business
Dad accused of forcing son into field, killing him
Coventry man killed in crash at I-77 ramp
College student mistaken for deer, shot to death
Man allegedly paid teens to spit in his face
Indians add 7 players to 40-man roster
Body with gunshot wounds found in Canton Township creek
Blogs:
Pets:
The Heldenfiles:
Friday Night Notebook
Patrick McManamon:
The proposed new LeBron mural doesn't do it for me
Akron Zips:
Two blowouts, one night
Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster
Cleveland Browns:
Hey, somebody's gotta stick up for the Browns
Kent State Sports:
Singletary update
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Indiana Pacers – Here’s to LBJ and Free Throws
Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad
Varsity Letters:
Bowling season starts today
All Da King's Men:
Headed For Disaster
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Muslim McCarthyism & Death Prayers
Akron Law Café:
Federal Judge Declares DOMA Unconstitutional
See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic
Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Silverdome Potentially SOLD!
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Norma asks if Barkitecture is still at Stan Hywet.
Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall
HRLite House:
Colloquium at University of Akron
Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go
Published on Thursday, Apr 03, 2008
As law director for the city of Akron, I think it is important that I clarify for our citizens a city ordinance concerning campaign contribution limits that, on occasion, receives attention in news stories in the Beacon Journal.
Most of the time, the impression left by these accounts is, in my opinion, misleading.
There is no gray area in this; nothing is left open for interpretation, and the ordinance has passed muster in U.S. District Court.
Further, this law has been in effect in Akron since Jan. 24, 2003. Yet, the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC) continues to complain that candidates, including Mayor Don Plusquellic, are not following the law.
This statement, as it concerns Plusquellic, is untrue and irresponsible.
The law at issue pertains to how much money candidates for city offices can raise for their campaign from individual donors.
On March 14, the Beacon Journal published an article (''Group protests mayor's election funds'') concerning the fund raising of Plusquellic for his 2007 primary campaign and his general election campaign. Some of what the article should have included and explained are:
Section 30.11 in our Code of Ordinances, which reads:
''CONTRIBUTION LIMITS
(C) No candidate for Mayor shall accept aggregate contributions per election from an individual person, political party, campaign committee, political action committee or political contributing entity in excess of $300.''
Most important to this article would have been to underscore Section 30.10 (f) dealing with the definition of the word ''election.'' The law clearly reads that fund raising within the limits specified above is legal in each election: primary and general.
Section 30.10 reads in part:
'' 'Per Election' means for each general election, primary election, special election, and/or runoff election in which a candidate's name appears on the ballot or in which the candidate has filed at the Summit County Board of Elections a declaration of intent to run as a write-in candidate.''
Mayor Plusquellic was clearly a candidate in the primary election and in the general election. The law allows him to accept contributions of $300 for the primary election and $300 for the general election.
For the AFSC to continually assert that this is not permitted under the law is patently wrong, and to continue to report these unfounded statements is irresponsible on the part of the newspaper.
Max Rothal
Akron
Cleaner air
at what cost?
I heard recently that the Environmental Protection Agency wants to change the formulation of our gasoline to make it ''cleaner.''
Do I have to even spend five minutes imagining what that would do to the price of gasoline?
We have just struggled with $3.49 a gallon for gasoline. What would we do if it suddenly shot to more than $4? The entire area would come to a shuddering halt, and the price of everything else would shoot straight through the roof. I can imagine the freeways becoming busy with people leaving the area for good.
The air would become cleaner, yes, but only because nobody would be left to pollute it. Or is that what the EPA is after, an empty Northeast Ohio?
Hello, EPA, the pollution you are finding was made in China, not here in good ol' Northeast Ohio.
Jenny Ray
Barberton
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
