Container Top
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Akron Docs in Haiti:
Almost home

First Bell - On Education:
21st Century Skills and Akron’s new middle school

Pets:
Lost Mini Schnauzer around Cascade Valley Park

The Heldenfiles:
Fess Parker, R.I.P.

Akron Zips:
Is it time to go after transfers?

Tribe Matters:
Wood sidelined at least six weeks

Cleveland Browns:
Yates latest to re-sign

Balanced Ledger:
How times have changed?

Kent State Sports:
Flashes fall in WNIT

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs at Chicago Bulls (Green Mascot and All)

Buckeye Blogging:
Bucks High Seed – Turner High Praise

Varsity Letters:
Jackson advances to Division I state semifinal

All Da King's Men:
ObamaCare To Reduce Premiums By 3000% ?

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Pathetic GOP Nullification Attempts

Akron Law Café:
More on Shaming Corporate Criminals

Car Chase:
2010 CONCOURS SEASON IS UPON US

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Deals in Miami?!.

Sound Check:
Willie Nelson & Family coming to the Akron Civic Theatre May 11

See Jane Style:
Who Wore What – The Oscars

HRLite House:
Horses of Courses

Akron Gamer:
Video: Gamers expected to 'reach' for new 'Halo'

'Into the Wild' disturbing

By Rich Heldenfels
Akron Beacon Journal

Published on Friday, Oct 05, 2007

What do you do with a movie that is thoughtful, and contains some wonderful acting, but keeps making you think that the main character is a fool?

 

Do you accept his fatal errors and simply follow the story? Do you, like other characters in the film, feel great affection for the young man, even as he heads into disaster? Or does the movie ultimately lose you, because you have spent more than two hours on a path that will lead you into despair and loss?

These are questions nagging at me ever since I saw Into the Wild, writer-director Sean Penn's engrossing but frustrating adaptation of Jon Krakauer's book of the same name.

The 1996 book attempted to understand Christopher McCandless, a wealthy and idealistic young man who thought he could live for an extended period in the wilds of Alaska. He was wrong, and starved to death in August 1992.

Krakauer tried to get at the heart of McCandless by looking at other doomed explorers, and at his own attempt at a similar adventure. He talked to McCandless' family, he visited places where McCandless had traveled. Even as he sat in the place where McCandless died, Krakauer thought that ''his essence remains slippery, vague, elusive.''

But even as Penn's movie follows the arc of McCandless' waning years (with some dramatic embroideries), it has some clarity about the wanderer, a view that will resonate with any parent who has worried about a grown child, and with any young person who has yearned to break free from his parents' way of life.

Into the Wild is a story about families, both real and cobbled together, and about people's common longing for companionship. McCandless might have felt that longing in his final days but it was too late to do him any good.

Indeed, it is longing that drives two of the film's most glorious performances, by Catherine Keener and Cleveland's own Hal Holbrook, as well as a marvelous moment by William Hurt.

Emile Hirsch plays McCandless, whom we first see as he is graduating from Emory University, poised for a new life. His parents (played by Hurt and Marcia Gay Harden) are expecting him to continue his education. Instead, without their knowledge, he gives away almost all of his savings and, penniless, goes off in search of a world free of the things he hates in his parents' comfortable lives.

The movie then follows his journeys down rivers and across deserts, picking up the occasional job and bonding with people he meets along the way. Hirsch's fresh-faced air of innocence and seeming openness appear to invite not only love but protection, whether it's from Keener's aging hippie, a somewhat shady businessman played by Vince Vaughn or the rough-hewn former military man played by Holbrook.

Because McCandless is so single-minded about his travels, especially his Alaskan dream, he repeatedly rejects the wisdom and love that others offer him. This is not new, since he has also cut himself off entirely from his parents and his beloved sister (Jena Malone). But it makes him seem offhandedly cruel, hurting those who offer him powerful emotional gifts.

And that is why I think him a fool.

And that is why, as McCandless faced death, it was not a more painful experience for me. He had chosen his direction, even with all its dreadful possibilities. I felt far more for his family, extended to include Keener and Holbrook, who did so many right things, only to suffer loss because they could not persuade McCandless.

 

Penn's direction is very good, though his script is at times overdone, especially in a voiceover by Malone. The supporting cast is extraordinary. The movie haunts me. But I'm still left troubled by the man in the middle of it.

Rich Heldenfels writes about popular culture for the Beacon Journal and in a blog at http://www.ohio.com. Contact him at 330-996-3582 or rheldenfels@thebeaconjournal.com.

 

What do you do with a movie that is thoughtful, and contains some wonderful acting, but keeps making you think that the main character is a fool?

Get the full article here.



Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button













Most Commented Stories