Container Top
Homes   Jobs   Cars   Shopping
Search

Events Calendar

EVENT SEARCH:

In This Section


Most Read Stories


Blogs:


Pets:
Cat-loving chihuahua suckles seven abandoned kittens

The Heldenfiles:
Friday Night Notebook

Patrick McManamon:
Browns vs. Lions live …

Akron Zips:
Akron trounces Howard to reach .500

Tribe Matters:
Seven players added to Tribe’s 40-man roster

Cleveland Browns:
Robiskie, Harrison inactive

Kent State Sports:
Kent State blown out in second half, loses to Temple 47-13

Cleveland Cavaliers:
Gameblog: Cavs vs. Philadelphia 76ers

Buckeye Blogging:
OSU – Michigan college football rivals meet in Baghdad

Varsity Letters:
Four area football teams play tonight

All Da King's Men:
The Sunday Sanity Challenge

Blog of Mass Destruction:
Will Health Care Reform Pass?

Akron Law Café:
Health Care Financing Reform: (69) The Brookings Institute Study on "Bending the Curve" – Four General Strategies

See Jane Style:
Vintage Chic

Car Chase:
TIME TO GET YOUR COLLECTOR CARS WINTERIZED

Let's Talk Real Estate:
Silverdome Potentially SOLD!

Ohio Travels with Betty:
George is looking for a Thanksgiving buffet in Akron.

Sound Check:
Steely Dan Plays "The Royal Scam" at E.J. Thomas Hall

HRLite House:
A Random Rant on Testing

Akron Gamer:
Nintendo's Mario endures even as games come and go

New law limits wine shipments to Ohioans

Legislation backed by state trade groups means consumers often will be forced to go to stores

Associated Press

COLUMBUS: A law limiting shipments from large out-of-state wineries directly to Ohioans likely means consumers will have to pay higher prices and go back to buying from local stores.

The law, added as an amendment to the state budget in June and backed by a lobbying effort from Ohio wineries and the state's powerful Wholesale Beer and Wine Association, is drawing the ire of a watchdog group that says the measure was passed with little or no public debate.

The ban, which went into effect Monday, stops wineries that make more than 150,000 gallons of wine a year, or about 63,000 cases, from directly shipping to Ohio consumers a practice that began after a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court ruling said in-state and out-of-state wine producers must be treated equally.

More than 100 Ohio wineries fall under that limit and are unaffected, according to the Ohio Wine Producers Association.

But the ban will affect thousands of Ohioans who have wine shipped from California and other places. It also means that Ohio wine drinkers will likely have to pay higher prices in stores, as well as miss out on limited-edition wines available only from out-of-state wineries.

State senators have said they were trying to protect Ohio's wine industry by including the ban in the budget.

''For me it was an economic-development issue dealing with the overall interest of promoting Ohio wineries,'' said state Sen. Tim Grendell, a Republican whose district covers Geauga County and is home to several wineries.

Grendell and state Sen. Jeff Jacobson, a Dayton-area Republican, teamed up to get the ban added in a June 12 amendment in the Senate Finance Committee. It was one of dozens of minor changes to the budget bill before it left the committee.

Grendell acknowledged that the Wholesale Beer and Wine Association, whose political action committee has given him $8,000 since 2004, pushed for the language.

''But it was the legislature and the legislators that decided the right way to go,'' he said.

Watchdog group Ohio Citizen Action said the ban should have been publicly debated before lawmakers voted.

''What we're talking about is not just access, it's cutting a deal that no one actually knows about until it's over,'' said Catherine Turcer, the group's legislative director.

But Jacobson said the matter was thoroughly discussed among lawmakers in June. He said he even spoke with a lobbyist for the large out-of-state wineries.

''This had plenty of discussion within the Senate,'' Jacobson said. ''It would be impossible for every issue in every budget bill to be one that people spend hours and hours talking in a public meeting about.''

One of the main architects of the state budget Republican state Rep. Matthew Dolan of suburban Cleveland said last week that he thought the ban would affect just retailers, not consumers. Dolan, the chairman of the House Finance Committee, said he'll seek to overturn the ban.

State Rep. Bill Seitz, a Cincinnati Republican, said he tried to raise the gallon cap from 150,000 to 250,000 before the budget reached a joint House-Senate conference committee, but Dolan turned him down.

Seitz said he thought Dolan didn't fully understand the meaning of the measure.

''It's understandable because he was chairman of finance and had a million things on his plate,'' Seitz said.

Associated Press

Get the full article here.


Story tools

Email  Email   Print  Print   Save  Save   Reprint  Reprint   Popular  Most Popular   Reprint  Subscribe

Share this story

AddThis Social Bookmark Button
















Most Commented Stories