Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Barbecue restaurant owner appeals mannequin's cover-up order
Suspect nabbed in child's death
Five years after attack, woman finds her way
Two men hurt in assaults in Kenmore
Hundreds in Canton for Tea Party
Promises look promising for Browns
New York congressman blasts Michael Jackson as 'pervert'
Blogs:
Pets:
Sunburn in canines and felines
The Heldenfiles:
Monday Notebook, New "90210" on DVD
Patrick McManamon:
Some Trevor Ariza tales
Akron Zips:
Opponent outlook: Northern Illinois
Browns Bulletin:
Single-game ticket sales begin July 11
Tribe Matters:
Marte is IL’s Batter of the Week
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth test showed marijuana
Kent State Sports:
Men's Basketball Scheduling update
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Free Agency Update: Frye in View?
All Da King's Men:
The Obligatory Palin Post
Blog of Mass Destruction:
The "Limbaugh Babies"
Akron Law Café:
The Veil and the Burqa – Constitutional to Ban or Restrict?
Varsity Letters:
Solon’s Baldwin could decide soon
See Jane Style:
Picnic Wear
Car Chase:
Where do We Go from Here?
Let's Talk Real Estate:
ID My Bug
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Jennifer inquires about a bus tour to Atlantic City
Sound Check:
Rundgren fans rejoice!: Second night of AWATS at The Civic added
HRLite House:
DDI One of Best Places to Work
Akron Gamer:
Hot link: Best of Nintendo at E3
Legislation backed by state trade groups means consumers often will be forced to go to stores
Published on Wednesday, Oct 03, 2007
Associated Press
COLUMBUS: A law limiting shipments from large out-of-state wineries directly to Ohioans likely means consumers will have to pay higher prices and go back to buying from local stores.
The law, added as an amendment to the state budget in June and backed by a lobbying effort from Ohio wineries and the state's powerful Wholesale Beer and Wine Association, is drawing the ire of a watchdog group that says the measure was passed with little or no public debate.
The ban, which went into effect Monday, stops wineries that make more than 150,000 gallons of wine a year, or about 63,000 cases, from directly shipping to Ohio consumers a practice that began after a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court ruling said in-state and out-of-state wine producers must be treated equally.
More than 100 Ohio wineries fall under that limit and are unaffected, according to the Ohio Wine Producers Association.
But the ban will affect thousands of Ohioans who have wine shipped from California and other places. It also means that Ohio wine drinkers will likely have to pay higher prices in stores, as well as miss out on limited-edition wines available only from out-of-state wineries.
State senators have said they were trying to protect Ohio's wine industry by including the ban in the budget.
''For me it was an economic-development issue dealing with the overall interest of promoting Ohio wineries,'' said state Sen. Tim Grendell, a Republican whose district covers Geauga County and is home to several wineries.
Grendell and state Sen. Jeff Jacobson, a Dayton-area Republican, teamed up to get the ban added in a June 12 amendment in the Senate Finance Committee. It was one of dozens of minor changes to the budget bill before it left the committee.
Grendell acknowledged that the Wholesale Beer and Wine Association, whose political action committee has given him $8,000 since 2004, pushed for the language.
''But it was the legislature and the legislators that decided the right way to go,'' he said.
Watchdog group Ohio Citizen Action said the ban should have been publicly debated before lawmakers voted.
''What we're talking about is not just access, it's cutting a deal that no one actually knows about until it's over,'' said Catherine Turcer, the group's legislative director.
But Jacobson said the matter was thoroughly discussed among lawmakers in June. He said he even spoke with a lobbyist for the large out-of-state wineries.
''This had plenty of discussion within the Senate,'' Jacobson said. ''It would be impossible for every issue in every budget bill to be one that people spend hours and hours talking in a public meeting about.''
One of the main architects of the state budget Republican state Rep. Matthew Dolan of suburban Cleveland said last week that he thought the ban would affect just retailers, not consumers. Dolan, the chairman of the House Finance Committee, said he'll seek to overturn the ban.
State Rep. Bill Seitz, a Cincinnati Republican, said he tried to raise the gallon cap from 150,000 to 250,000 before the budget reached a joint House-Senate conference committee, but Dolan turned him down.
Seitz said he thought Dolan didn't fully understand the meaning of the measure.
''It's understandable because he was chairman of finance and had a million things on his plate,'' Seitz said.
Associated Press
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
