Events Calendar
In This Section
Egg recall gives birth to new fears over safety
D'Agnese's on White Pond to serve breakfast
Melon gets its slice of the pie
Quick & easy: Steak taco salad
Greek Vegetable Soup wows guests
Ask Lisa: What is the best way to package and ship the items to ensure freshness?
Chicken salad healthier with fresh white sauce
The right balance in chunky spread
'Food Feuds' to weigh in this week on Akron burgers, Barberton chicken
Most Read Stories
Akron man, 28, found dead after fall from vehicle
Police: Ohio man allowed wife to be eaten by maggots
Young's Hotel to be torn down; private developer to build hotel, retail complex on Akron site
'Food Feuds' to weigh in this week on Akron burgers, Barberton chicken
Tinted windows lead to police chase, crash in Akron
Two Akron men charged after attempted break-in at Green home
Blogs:
Ohio Politics/Elections:
Boccieri Shows Up at Renacci Town Hall, Engages in Impromptu Debate
Cleveland Browns:
Nothing new on Wednesday's Browns/Bucs injury report
Marla Ridenour on Sports:
Browns find plenty of good men
Varsity Letters:
Gridlocks: Week 3
The330:
Kanakaredes says she’ll have ‘CSI’ memories to treasure
Tribe Matters:
Monday’s Tribe lineup
First Bell - On Education:
Report is filed on bus incident
The Heldenfiles:
TNT Orders "Dallas" Pilot
Pets:
PAWS Pet of the Week: Meet Autumn!
Cleveland Cavaliers:
Scott believes Cavs can still win
Akron Zips:
No. 1 UA secures 2-0 win over No. 3 Wake Forest
Kent State Sports:
Around the MAC–Week 1
Akron Docs in Haiti:
Orphans in Fondwa
Buckeye Blogging:
‘The Shoe’ is Open for Business
All Da King's Men:
"They Talk About Me Like A Dog"
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Endangering U.S. Troops To Regain Power?
Akron Law Café:
Losing Common Ground
Car Chase:
Free Glenmoor Gathering Tickets
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Gossip Girl
Sound Check:
Robert Wilson, Gap Band bassist, dies
See Jane Style:
Making It Up
HRLite House:
From the White House – New Federal Approach to Hiring
By John Rosemond
McClatchy Newspapers
POSTED: 04:50 p.m. EDT, Jun 01, 2009
My recent series, ''I'm ready for the 1960s to be over and done with,'' set off nervequakes in some readers. (For those of you who missed it, the entire series is still available at http://www.rosemond.com — my theme was that American parenting began its continuing downhill slide in that dumbest and most deconstructive of decades.)
One fellow, obviously intent upon lowering my self-esteem, speculates that I either have yet to emerge from the Stone Age or just crawled out of the bomb shelter my parents stuffed me into in 1959. He refers specifically to my contention that children should not be allowed to express feelings freely. He writes, sarcastically, ''Like love, maybe?''
Well, since he mentioned it, yes, children should not even be allowed to express feelings of love freely. The problem with this fellow's thinking is the problem in contemporary American parenting. He implies that children should be allowed what adults are not allowed. In so doing, he inadvertently nails the problem. That very ''child-centered'' philosophy is the prime reason for the general degradation of parental discipline and, therefore, child behavior since the 1950s.
Once upon a time, when a child of even toddler stage did something rude or anti-social, he was told, in no uncertain terms, to stop, be quiet, apologize, give it back, leave the area or whatever was appropriate to the situation. Silly attempts to reason — as in ''You're making bad choices'' — were not a feature of the Stone Age parent's vocabulary. In this way, children learned, early on, to control the expression of certain behaviors and feelings in certain situations. That is how, by the way, a child is socialized, and it is in a child's best interest to be sensitized to social norms as early as possible.
Take love, for example. If it is inappropriate for an adult to blurt out ''I love you!'' whenever the feeling strikes, then I submit it is inappropriate for a child of certain age and in certain situations to do so as well. In both cases, the spontaneous expression of feeling may cause the individual who is the object of said emotion to feel very uncomfortable.
Let's use some common sense (a Stone Age trait) at this point. It is cute for a 3-year-old boy to blurt this out to a female playmate. It is not necessarily cute when an 8-year-old boy does the same thing. Somewhere between the two ages, children need to be told that expressing spontaneous love to someone outside of one's immediate family is to be done only after great forethought and always with prudence (a Stone Age virtue). Besides, in today's paranoid school system, expressing love toward a classmate may result in reassignment to a third-grade re-education camp somewhere in the Mojave Desert.
The same (sans the re-education camp) applies to the expression of any emotion. The lack of emotional self-control is uncivilized. The exercise of same is civilized. Therefore, I am arguing for nothing more radical than the restoration of civility to child rearing.
As I write this, in an airport waiting area, a mother is following her toddler as he runs up and down the rows of occupied seats, yelling incoherently, causing a general disturbance. Mom is smiling, as if she thinks this is cute. No doubt she would agree with my critic. Her child wants to run and yell in a public area; therefore, he should be allowed to run and yell (and she should run grinning after him, doubling the disturbance).
I'm certain that the Stone Age mother would have removed her child from the area, insisted that he calm down and taught him to sit quietly with her. And everyone, including her child, would have benefited from her repressive, draconian attitude.
Family psychologist John Rosemond answers parents' questions on his Web site at http://www.rosemond.com.
My recent series, ''I'm ready for the 1960s to be over and done with,'' set off nervequakes in some readers. (For those of you who missed it, the entire series is still available at http://www.rosemond.com — my theme was that American parenting began its continuing downhill slide in that dumbest and most deconstructive of decades.)
One fellow, obviously intent upon lowering my self-esteem, speculates that I either have yet to emerge from the Stone Age or just crawled out of the bomb shelter my parents stuffed me into in 1959. He refers specifically to my contention that children should not be allowed to express feelings freely. He writes, sarcastically, ''Like love, maybe?''
Well, since he mentioned it, yes, children should not even be allowed to express feelings of love freely. The problem with this fellow's thinking is the problem in contemporary American parenting. He implies that children should be allowed what adults are not allowed. In so doing, he inadvertently nails the problem. That very ''child-centered'' philosophy is the prime reason for the general degradation of parental discipline and, therefore, child behavior since the 1950s.
Once upon a time, when a child of even toddler stage did something rude or anti-social, he was told, in no uncertain terms, to stop, be quiet, apologize, give it back, leave the area or whatever was appropriate to the situation. Silly attempts to reason — as in ''You're making bad choices'' — were not a feature of the Stone Age parent's vocabulary. In this way, children learned, early on, to control the expression of certain behaviors and feelings in certain situations. That is how, by the way, a child is socialized, and it is in a child's best interest to be sensitized to social norms as early as possible.
Take love, for example. If it is inappropriate for an adult to blurt out ''I love you!'' whenever the feeling strikes, then I submit it is inappropriate for a child of certain age and in certain situations to do so as well. In both cases, the spontaneous expression of feeling may cause the individual who is the object of said emotion to feel very uncomfortable.
Let's use some common sense (a Stone Age trait) at this point. It is cute for a 3-year-old boy to blurt this out to a female playmate. It is not necessarily cute when an 8-year-old boy does the same thing. Somewhere between the two ages, children need to be told that expressing spontaneous love to someone outside of one's immediate family is to be done only after great forethought and always with prudence (a Stone Age virtue). Besides, in today's paranoid school system, expressing love toward a classmate may result in reassignment to a third-grade re-education camp somewhere in the Mojave Desert.
The same (sans the re-education camp) applies to the expression of any emotion. The lack of emotional self-control is uncivilized. The exercise of same is civilized. Therefore, I am arguing for nothing more radical than the restoration of civility to child rearing.
As I write this, in an airport waiting area, a mother is following her toddler as he runs up and down the rows of occupied seats, yelling incoherently, causing a general disturbance. Mom is smiling, as if she thinks this is cute. No doubt she would agree with my critic. Her child wants to run and yell in a public area; therefore, he should be allowed to run and yell (and she should run grinning after him, doubling the disturbance).
I'm certain that the Stone Age mother would have removed her child from the area, insisted that he calm down and taught him to sit quietly with her. And everyone, including her child, would have benefited from her repressive, draconian attitude.
Family psychologist John Rosemond answers parents' questions on his Web site at http://www.rosemond.com.
Most Commented Stories
- 136
Young's Hotel to be torn down; private developer to build hotel, retail complex on Akron site
52
- 46
- 35
Don't extend tax breaks for wealthiest, Obama says in Cleveland
35
- 30
'Food Feuds' to weigh in this week on Akron burgers, Barberton chicken
23
Two Akron men charged after attempted break-in at Green home
22
- 21
Akron police react unhappily to tentative pact that saves jobs but forces concessions
19
