Events Calendar
In This Section
Most Read Stories
Man robbed at Tallmadge Avenue eatery
Another winter punch heading toward Ohio
Four teens restrain man, take items from his Akron home
Complaints against officer keep coming
Police: Ohio girl dies after fall into snow bank
Region makes way for latest batch of snow; cancellations rise
Cuyahoga Falls residents come home to find burning couch on balcony
Blogs:
First Bell - On Education:
No City of Akron basketball tonight
Pets:
Pet telethon re-airs
The Heldenfiles:
Chipmunks "Squeakquel" on DVD/BD March 30
Akron Zips:
Late surge gives Zips ugly road win
Tribe Matters:
Blogmail response on Hafner
Cleveland Browns:
Stallworth's contract terminated
Balanced Ledger:
QB in Browns future: another mock draft
Kent State Sports:
KSU Notes – February 9
Cleveland Cavaliers:
NBA Power Rankings from Around the Internet
Buckeye Blogging:
Buckeyes grab 18 players on signing day
Varsity Letters:
Garfield at Buchtel basketball
All Da King's Men:
Palin At The Tea Party Convention
Blog of Mass Destruction:
Republican Pre-Conditions
Akron Law Café:
Law, Love and Chocolate
Car Chase:
Collector Car Hobby Loses One of the Best—Jim Roll
Let's Talk Real Estate:
Decisions Decisions: Credit Cards or Your Mortgage?
Ohio Travels with Betty:
Loucile is looking for a Lake Erie getaway in June for three kids, ages 1, 3, and 5.
Sound Check:
Talk of the Town – Top entertainment picks for the weekend
HRLite House:
OFCCP Report
Akron Gamer:
Makers of 'Castle Crashers' unveil 'BattleBlock Theater'
See Jane Style:
Do IT this week: Layering
Librarians and publishers dispute that volumes printed before 1986 pose a danger
By Lee Logan
Associated Press
Published on Wednesday, Mar 18, 2009
JEFFERSON CITY, MO.: Could a vintage, dog-eared copy of The Cat in the Hat or Where the Wild Things Are be hazardous to your children?
Probably not, according to the nation's premier medical sleuths, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
But a new federal law banning more than minute levels of lead in most products intended for children 12 or younger — and a federal agency's interpretation of the law — prompted at least two libraries last month to pull children's books printed before 1986 from their shelves.
Lead poisoning has been linked to irreversible learning disabilities and behavioral problems, and lead was present in printer's ink until a growing body of regulations banned it in 1986. The federal law, which took effect Feb. 10, was passed last summer after a string of recalls of toys.
The Consumer Product Safety Commission has interpreted the law to include books but has neither concluded that older books could be hazardous to children nor made any recommendations to libraries about quarantining such tomes, agency chief of staff Joe Martyak said Tuesday.
Still, the agency's interpretation itself has been labeled alarmist by some librarians.
''We're talking about tens of millions of copies of children's books that are perfectly safe. I wish a reasonable, rational person would just say, 'This is stupid. What are we doing?' '' said Emily Sheketoff, executive director of the American Library Association's Washington office.
A CPSC spokesman told the Associated Press in a recent interview that until more testing is done, the nation's more than 116,000 public and school libraries should take steps to ensure that children are kept away from books printed before 1986.
After the spokesman's comments appeared Tuesday in an AP story, Martyak said the spokesman ''misspoke'' about the agency's stance on older books and younger children.
''We're not urging libraries to take them off the shelves,'' Martyak said. ''It's true the CPSC is investigating whether the ink contains unsafe levels of lead in children's books printed before 1986.''
Jay Dempsey, a health communications specialist at the CDC, said lead-based ink in children's books poses little danger.
''If that child were to actually start mouthing the book — as some children put everything in their mouths — that's where the concern would be,'' Dempsey said. ''But on a scale of one to 10, this is like a 0.5 level of concern.''
The publishing and printing industries set up a Web site for book publishers last December to post the results of studies measuring the lead in books and their components, such as ink and paper.
Those results show lead levels that were often undetectable and consistently below not only the new federal threshold, but the more stringent limit that goes into effect in August 2011.
Those findings were cited in a letter from the Association of American Publishers to the CPSC.
The American Library Association said it has no estimate of how many children's books printed before 1986 are in circulation. Typically, libraries don't have many, because youngsters are hard on books, librarians said.
JEFFERSON CITY, MO.: Could a vintage, dog-eared copy of The Cat in the Hat or Where the Wild Things Are be hazardous to your children?
Get the full article here.
Comments
Click here to post your comments
