All CATEGORIES
☰ Menu


John Rosemond: Home schooling not appropriate for child who is disobedient

By John Rosemond McClatchy-Tribune News Service

Print
Add This

Q.: My 5-year-old son is an only child whom I home school. He talks back, argues and generally wears me down. I need help getting to him to realize that no is no, that I mean what I say. I know I’m the problem. Help!

A.: Better that you have come to grips now with the fact that you are the problem than when he’s much older and these difficulties have acquired much more momentum.

Before giving you advice, I have to repeat: I do not recommend home schooling when the child is disobedient, disrespectful and generally difficult to “control.” Pre-existing discipline problems are counterproductive to an effective home-school environment. Discipline problems should be solved before home schooling is attempted. So the first recommendation for your consideration is that you send your son to “regular” school until you get his behavior under control.

Today’s parents believe discipline is a technology involving the manipulation of reward and punishment. In other words, they believe discipline is accomplished through the proper use of consequences. The fact is that whereas consequences are sometimes needed, more with some kids than others, the proper discipline of a child is primarily a matter of employing authoritative speech, including body language.

Taking one example, do not (as the majority of parenting pundits advise) “get down to your child’s level” when you speak to him or her. In so doing, you look like you are pleading. Stand upright. When I speak on proper discipline, I emphasize the need for parents to “act like superior beings.” It may come as a surprise, but contrary to what some parenting “experts” have promoted for more than a generation, adults are superior to children.

Learn to employ what I call “leadership speech” when giving instructions and communicating decisions. Use the fewest words possible, come straight to the point, and do not give explanations. Explanations sound persuasive as opposed to authoritative. As such, they invite argument.

Wrong way: The parent is scrunched down, hands on knees. “Honey, it would really help Mommy if you’d pick up the toys in the living room and put them away so my friend Susan and I can use that room to talk and have coffee without a lot of distractions. Will you do that for Mommy, OK?”

To an instruction communicated in that wimpy fashion, a child is likely to say, “I was here first! Why do I have to move? And you never let me have anything to drink in here! No!” The problem has been created by the parent. The child is only responding to the parent’s nonauthoritative presentation.

Right way: The parent is standing upright. “I need you to pick up these toys and move them to another room. I’ll be back in a few minutes to see that it’s done.” And then, walk away. Standing there will invite resistance.

If, as you’re walking away, the child asks “Why?” stop, turn around, and say, “Because I said so. Any other questions?” And then leave the scene.

Write family psychologist John Rosemond at www.rosemond.com.


Print
Add This


MORE IN LIFESTYLE MORE IN LIFESTYLE >
EDITORS' PICKS

OHIO.COM VIDEOS

Prev Next

Most Read Stories